By on November 26, 2011

Having read most of the latest raft of auto industry books, with titles like “Car Crash,” “Overhaul,” and “Sixty To Zero,” I have to say, Bill Vlasic’s “Once Upon A Car” is my favorite of the bunch. Not only does it lack the parochial form and voice that define too many of theses tomes, it populates its narrative with rich dialogue and intriguing character studies. In short, it’s got all of the lessons about industry, culture, and competition that you’d expect from a modern study of the auto industry, but it presents them in such a way that they never feel like a lecture or a business school study. Instead you get a well-spun yarn, still-newsworthy anecdotes and an unvarnished look at industry dynamics on their highest level. If ever there were to be a modern movie based on the auto industry, Vlasic’s book should be its basis. Read my full review over at The Wall Street Journal.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!


9 Comments on “TTAC In The WSJ: A Review Of “Once Upon A Car”...”

  • avatar

    Great review. Now I’ll have to borrow your copy.

    • 0 avatar

      I take issue with the term “ressurection”, at least as it applies to GM and Chrysler. These last vestiges of US manufacturing are generally being kept on life support by the govt.

      • 0 avatar
        doctor olds

        @Contrarian- GM is again the largest selling carmaker in the world, as well as the two largest national markets, China and USA. They have regained significant share here this year and the company netted nearly $7B in the first 3/4 of 2011. They have not received a dime from government since Treasury financed the bankruptcy and restructuring.
        New GM is an unqualified success story and the term “resurrection” is quite appropriate .

  • avatar

    I enjoyed review and added book to my Amazon wish list. I have older book “Comeback: The Fall & Rise of the American Automobile Industry” by Paul Ingrassia and Joseph White. It opened my eyes to what was going on in Detroit in 80s-90s. It also ends with hope that Detroit Big 3 comeback in 90s was for real. But authors did not hold much hope though knowing bad habits of Big 3 management and labor force very well.

    I do not understand though what GM tried to accomplish with merger?

  • avatar

    Great review. I’ll pick up a copy,first chance I get.

  • avatar

    Ditto. Very good WSJ review. Sounds like a must read. Thanks Ed!

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Carlson Fan: “I guess that’s why GM canned the Volt?” I think GM along w/Ford pretty much canned most of...
  • Vulpine: @jack4x: Semi trucks aren’t driven by un-trained idiots, either. drivers of Semi trucks are required...
  • Carrera: Every Saturday I take my daughter to balet. Since it only lasts one hour, I just sit in my modest, little...
  • DC Bruce: Once your German machine is out of its 3-year warranty, you’ll probably want to sell it before it...
  • pveezy: That’s because if you want a reasonably price EV, and you don’t want a car that makes you look like a total...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Matthew Guy
  • Timothy Cain
  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Chris Tonn
  • Corey Lewis
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber