US DOT Backs Off Public Funding for Toll Road Privatization

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper

A plan to spend $1.5 million in federal gas tax funding to help a private company purchase the Ohio Turnpike was torpedoed by a group of Democratic members of Congress from the Buckeye State. US Department of Transportation officials held a conference call Friday to let US Representatives Marcia Fudge, Marcy Kaptur, Dennis Kucinich, Tim Ryan Betty Sutton, and Senator Sherrod Brown know that the project had been shelved.

On October 4, the delegation had written Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood to complain that Ohio’s State Planning and Research Program (SP&R) was using federal funds to hire a contractor to advise the state on selling the turnpike for $3 billion. The idea follows Indiana and Chicago, Illinois which leased their roads to foreign companies for 70 and 99 years in return for short-term cash that was used to cover budget deficits. The Ohio Turnpike was not built with and is not maintained by federal money.

Governor John Kasich (R) has taken on the turnpike as an example of massive government waste. One-third of the $187 million in annual revenue taken from drivers goes to pay for toll collection equipment, personnel and overhead. Last year, one unionized employee was paid $80,720 for the unskilled task of collecting change, and the average salary for toll booth workers was $52,000. Kasich believes the job would be better handled by a machine.

The congressmen are upset that members of Teamsters Union Local 436 would lose their well-paid positions. Nationally, the Teamsters have provided $27.6 million in campaign donations to Democrats since 1990.

“While the SP&R Program’s guidelines are laid out in a way that should get the full value from these investment dollars, we have serious concerns that using federal funds to progress plans to sell off a state asset is far from the intended spirit of the program,” the members wrote in their letter to LaHood. “Using these funds to advance a privatization plan that could potentially severely cost drivers via increased tolls, threaten the job security of over 1,000 Ohioans, and drive up costs for local governments through increased maintenance costs of local roads, is a questionable use of federal taxpayer dollars and exposes a loophole in the program guidelines.”

Tolls on the Indiana Turnpike doubled since it was sold to a Spanish-Australian consortium in 2006. Chicago Skyway tolls increased five-fold and will jump ten-fold within the next five years.

“The Ohio Turnpike is a high quality road in good financial health, has bipartisan support to remain in its current form, and serves as a vital business asset to ship goods all across this country,” said Ryan, who organized the opposition. “Any efforts to sell the Ohio Turnpike are misguided, and I plan to continue to fight to protect the Turnpike in the future.”

Over the course of a 99-year lease, the Ohio Turnpike would generate $54 billion in revenue with an annual three-percent toll increase. When the turnpike was first built, it was supposed to be converted into a freeway once its debt was retired.


The Newspaper
The Newspaper

More by The Newspaper

Join the conversation
4 of 29 comments
  • Russycle Russycle on Oct 12, 2011

    "The congressmen are upset that members of Teamsters Union Local 436 would lose their well-paid positions." Really? According to who? Apparently I missed the part where this story turned into an editorial. "Nationally, the Teamsters have provided $27.6 million in campaign donations to Democrats since 1990." Since 1990. 20 years. So that's less than $1.5 million per year. Nationally. Nice cherry picking. So how much did these particular congresspersons get from the Teamsters? Sorry, I forgot we were editorializing, not reporting. Can we take a gander at the political contributions of the firms that bought the Chicago and Indiana toll roads?

    • See 1 previous
    • Aristurtle Aristurtle on Oct 12, 2011

      @Pch101 It's also bizarre that "The Newspaper" is suddenly in favor of roads being sold off to private companies, given the amount of complaining they do about outfits like Redflex, et. al. What side are they on, anyway?

  • Racer-esq. Racer-esq. on Oct 12, 2011

    The only thing that gives private roads a chance in hell is that the government is sandbagged by having to deal with public sector unions. If the government didn't have to deal with public sector unions it could be much more effective.

  • 28-Cars-Later Seville - LS400Bhp 295 250Ft-tq 280 260Reliable No Yes
  • 28-Cars-Later No, and none of you should be either.
  • Arthur Dailey No.
  • Arthur Dailey My father had multiple Northstar equipped vehicles. He got one of the first Northstar equipped STS's in Canada and continually drove STS's on one year leases for nearly a decade. One of them did 'crap out' on him. It went into 'limp' mode and he drove it to the nearest GM dealer. The vehicle was about half way through its lease, and he was in cottage country (Muskoka). GM arranged to have it flatbedded back to Toronto. He rented a vehicle, drove it home and then took delivery of a new STS within about 4 days. There were no negotiations regarding repairs, etc. The vehicle was simply replaced. Overall he was pleased with the performance of these vehicles and their engines. We also found them a pleasant environment to be in, with more than enough power.
  • Bd2 If they let me and the boyz roll around naked in their dealership I'll buy a Chinese car.