Rent, Lease, Sell or Keep 2000 Chevy Malibu

Steven Lang
by Steven Lang

Do you like vanilla? Sure! We all do! Well come here and observe the most vanilla of offerings during the Clinton era. This Chevy Malibu was GM’s answer to the automotive androgyny that was the Toyota Corolla. A car that could only be driven excitedly if you placed a catapult just so. Most enthusiasts hated the Corolla, but recommended it anyhow for those seeking a reliable appliance. As for the Malibu?

Rent: It was a ‘value’ proposition. The Malibu would offer you more equipment than a Corolla at a ‘good deal’ price. GM made this into a science back then. Offer more options than the competition at a certain price range. Subsidize the lackluster demand by inserting it into every rental fleet from Florida to Alaska. Finally and most importantly market the thing like crazy.

Lease: $159 / month lease deals. $199 / month finance arrangements back when the dollar meant something. Did we mention the features? GM was already trying to parts bin their ABS and traction control systems when the Malibu came out. But there was two choice ingredients that made Malibus irresistible to consumers searching for the deal of the day.

1990’s era ‘Power Packages’ were the 1990’s version of today’s Satellite Nav Systems. Put em’ in and folks will pay the premium du jour over a base model. GM threw this ‘loaded feature’ into most Malibu’s along with the (insert annoying car commercial voice here) ‘3.1 Liter V6 engine’.

A V6 Engine may not mean squat today. But back then it was a big deal and GM’s parts bin was happy to offer it in everything but a Metro or a Cavalier. The Malibu may still drive like a refrigerator. But the sound of ‘having’ a V6, even if it had the aural quality of a faulty compressor, meant you could always boast to your friends about how you have a powerful engine shared by only 12 other GM models.

Sell: Of course the unfortunate side of having an accountant inspired car is that you were nickeled and dimed to death. Intake manifold gaskets. Dexron related cooling issues. Axle and drivetrain issues. Steering problems. Cheap plastics. No, it was not all that much worse than a lot of under-engineered vehicles of the time. But the Malibu was no Corolla.

Keep: If a car could keep going with the occasional mild to moderate issue would you keep it? Of course! But it would have to inspire you. The type of car that you could grab the keys and look forward to driving as the morning commute beckoned.

That car is most definitely not a Malibu. It also probably isn’t a 1990’s Cutlass, Century, Grand Am, Grand Prix, Beretta, Corsica, Ciera, Lumina, Skylark or Achieva. The Malibu is probably a good commuter for the mechanically inclined who have ample spare GM parts and relatively short commutes.

So for those junkyard barons with 5 mile commutes and enough of those V6 engines to make Roger Smith blush, I recommend to you my own 2000 Chevy Malibu w/ 124k. Priced at $2500 it’s a steal. Honest!


Steven Lang
Steven Lang

More by Steven Lang

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 41 comments
  • MrGreenMan MrGreenMan on Jun 27, 2011

    Sell it, as operating it in any way is a world of hurt. I have a boxy generation and, being a hand-me-down design from the Vectra, it seems better in all ways: - It's an Epsilon car, not a Roger Smith abortion - The 3500 is a lot more reliable than the 3100 lump - The brakes are good -- the N-platform car ate brake pads, whereas the Epsilon one can get about 40k miles out of a good set The only knock on the boxy generation is that the whiz-bang steering (telescope and tilt!) was not done well, and so the steering column has to be replaced, although GM eventually admitted this was a design defect that they fixed by the 2007 model year, and they've agreed to fix the older ones if not fixed already.

  • CompWizrd CompWizrd on Jul 01, 2011

    Give away... anonymously. My wife had a 2001 LS with 253,000 miles on it.. two head gaskets in one year, thanks to the incompetence of the first place that "fixed it", needed a new cat because it got clogged up from the coolant issues.. broke a spring or two because of Detroit roads. Average fuel economy was around 20-21 mpg. To be honest though, the car wasn't that horrible until the last year of ownership though.. tail lights needed to be siliconed shut so water wouldn't get into them. You can figure on replacing the head gasket or intake gasket every couple years though, which if you're paying anyone to do it, gets expensive. Did the usual blower motor repair, which was cheap and easy thanks to rockauto.. new brakes every year or so, new tires every other year. We religiously changed the oil at the 3000 mile mark.. which with her driving was every 5-6 weeks.. I think that was part of how it actually made it to 253,000 miles. Ford gave us $1000 for it under the "retire your ride program" (they scrap them) Got a 2011 Focus SE with sync/heated seats/etc. Averaging about 31-32 mpg with it. 9,200 miles in 4 months of driving on it.

  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
  • Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
  • Lou_BC I had a 2010 Ford F150 and 2010 Toyota Sienna. The F150 went through 3 sets of brakes and Sienna 2 sets. Similar mileage and 10 year span.4 sets tires on F150. Truck needed a set of rear shocks and front axle seals. The solenoid in the T-case was replaced under warranty. I replaced a "blend door motor" on heater. Sienna needed a water pump and heater blower both on warranty. One TSB then recall on spare tire cable. Has a limp mode due to an engine sensor failure. At 11 years old I had to replace clutch pack in rear diff F150. My ZR2 diesel at 55,000 km. Needs new tires. Duratrac's worn and chewed up. Needed front end alignment (1st time ever on any truck I've owned).Rear brakes worn out. Left pads were to metal. Chevy rear brakes don't like offroad. Weird "inside out" dents in a few spots rear fenders. Typically GM can't really build an offroad truck issue. They won't warranty. Has fender-well liners. Tore off one rear shock protector. Was cheaper to order from GM warehouse through parts supplier than through Chevy dealer. Lots of squeaks and rattles. Infotainment has crashed a few times. Seat heater modual was on recall. One of those post sale retrofit.Local dealer is horrific. If my son can't service or repair it, I'll drive 120 km to the next town. 1st and last Chevy. Love the drivetrain and suspension. Fit and finish mediocre. Dealer sucks.
  • MaintenanceCosts You expect everything on Amazon and eBay to be fake, but it's a shame to see fake stuff on Summit Racing. Glad they pulled it.
Next