Nevada Clears Road For Driverless Cars

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

Careful when transiting Nevada by car: Soon, there can be driverless cars on the roads of the desert state, legally. Nevada passed Bill 511 ( full text here) that lays the framework for autonomous vehicles.

For instance, the bill authorizes the Nevada DMV to come up with rules for driverless cars. Just think of it: Will you need a driver’s license to operate a car that needs no driver? Actually, you will need a special license.

“Sec. 2. Chapter 483 of NRS is hereby amended by adding thereto a new section to read as follows:

The Department shall by regulation establish a driver’s license endorsement for the operation of an autonomous vehicle on the highways of this State. The driver’s license endorsement described in this subsection must, in its restrictions or lack thereof, recognize the fact that a person is not required to actively drive an autonomous vehicle.”

Got that?

Computerworld calls the bill “the first step in what could be a lengthy process in getting autonomous cars, which are designed to use artificial intelligence, computer sensors and GPS instead of human drivers, on the nation’s roads.”

Nevada Clears Road For Driverless Cars

Careful when transiting Nevada by car: Soon, there can be driverless cars on the roads of the desert state, legally. Nevada passed Bill 511 ( full text here) that lays the framework for autonomous vehicles.

For instance, the bill authorizes the Nevada DMV to come up with rules for the driverless cars. Just think of it: Will you need a driver’s license to operate a car that needs no driver? Actually, you will need a special license.

“Sec. 2. Chapter 483 of NRS is hereby amended by adding thereto a new section to read as follows:

The Department shall by regulation establish a driver’s license endorsement for the operation of an autonomous vehicle on the highways of this State. The driver’s license endorsement described in this subsection must, in its restrictions or lack thereof, recognize the fact that a person is not required to actively drive an autonomous vehicle.”

Got that?

Computerworld calls the bill “the first step in what could be a lengthy process in getting autonomous cars, which are designed to use artificial intelligence, computer sensors and GPS instead of human drivers, on the nation’s roads.”

Comments
Join the conversation
 1 comment
  • Robert Schwartz Robert Schwartz on Jun 29, 2011

    We have driverless cars here in Central Ohio. They do have a human being sitting in the left front seat, but that person is texting, eating, smoking, applying makeup, and even reading newspapers, not driving.

  • 28-Cars-Later Another: How does Stellantis plan to leverage the EV experience of PSA and Opel (?) against the former FCA operation?
  • Ltcmgm78 We bought a 2017 Volt when it came off lease. What a great car! Cost us $18,000 to buy. We put gas in it a couple of times a year. GM blew it with this car as they have done with others. No buyer education. This should have been the bridge car between pure ICE vehicles and pure battery vehicles. No range anxiety at all. And ours still gets 44 mpg running the gas "generator" to power the electric motor. We love it and wish a new model would return to market.
  • Tassos "Fools Cells" are 20 years into the future.THe problem is, the clowns who cheerlead for them have been saying this for the last 20 years, and before that they claimed they are only TEN years into the future (in 1990. so they would dominate by... 2000). Toyota Shareholders and workers will suffer because of the EGO of those damned fools execs who wasted TEN YEARS, letting TESLA dominate the BEV industry (of the FREE WORLD, China excluded).
  • Urlik You’d think VW would have learned from Honda and Cadillac making the same mistake to varying degrees.
  • EBFlex This will be the end of the Dodge brand. They are going from making vehicles people actually want to little pieces of garbage like the hornet and government cars (EVs).
Next