Florida City Agrees to Refund Illegal Red Light Camera Tickets

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper
florida city agrees to refund illegal red light camera tickets

Some Florida are beginning to regret jumping on the red light camera bandwagon without bothering to wait for state legislative approval. On Wednesday, the Pembroke Pines city commission voted to approve a settlement with attorney Jason D. Weisser who filed a lawsuit against a number of towns that began automated ticketing before state law was changed last July to allow automated ticketing.

Pembroke Pines collected a total of $450,854 from the program prior to July. By settling the case without going to trial, Pembroke Pines and American Traffic Solutions (ATS) will each contribute a third of their profit to the settlement fund — $106,589 from the city and $28,667 from the vendor, plus about $10,000 in administrative costs. Ticket recipients would then receive a partial refund within six months from this fund. ATS has cut the same deal in all the other cities that Weisser sued.

“The city attorney’s office and special counsel have reviewed the proposal, as well as the status of the litigation both in the city’s specific case and in other cases,” City Attorney Samuel S. Goren wrote in a memo to the commission. “Given the rulings to date, it cannot be said with any degree of certainty that the city would ultimately prevail.”

Commission members on Wednesday also deferred the decision on a long-term renewal of its photo enforcement contract with ATS over concern that the program was not making money.

“We can’t implement the program that’s not economically sustainable for the city,” Commissioner Carl Shechter said. “The cost of safety would become too high for the city.”

ATS salesman Greg Parks explained that “the cameras were not producing the desired revenue” because the commission decided to drop right-turn-on-red ticketing. Parks insisted the fees his company charges are based on the number of tickets issued so that the city will never lose money.

“You can’t pay us more than you take in,” Parks said.

ATS offered a rebate and lowered costs for the program to entice the city to renew their contract. The company also agreed to move cameras out of non-profitable locations.

“There are places where these cameras are not working, not producing any income — not for ATS, not for us,” Shechter said. “And this is about revenue… in addition to safety. If there’s no revenue, we are paying the bill for safety.”

[Courtesy: Thenewspaper.com]

Join the conversation
2 of 3 comments
  • Halftruth Halftruth on Jun 17, 2011

    “And this is about revenue… in addition to safety. If there’s no revenue, we are paying the bill for safety.” "...about revenue.." Just stop right there. Nuff said.

  • CarPerson CarPerson on Jun 17, 2011

    The Cities and ATS will kick in a maximum of one-third of their PROFITS for running an illegal citation-generating scheme??? WOW! The fix is in at every conceivable angle with the cameras. Even Elliott Ness would shake his head and decline to try to bring these people to justice...

  • SPPPP The little boosters work way better than you would expect. I am a little nervous about carrying one more lithium battery around in the car (because of fire risk). But I have used the booster more than once on trips, and it has done the job. Also, it seems to hold charge for a very long time - months at least - when you don't use it. (I guess I could start packing it for trips, but leaving it out of the car on normal days, to minimize the fire risk.)
  • Bader Hi I want the driver side lights including the bazl and signal
  • Theflyersfan One positive: doesn't appear to have a sunroof. So you won't need to keep paper towels in the car.But there's a serious question to ask this seller - he has less than 40,000 miles on some major engine work, and the transmission and clutch work and mods are less than 2 months old...why are you selling? That's some serious money in upgrades and repairs, knowing that the odds of getting it back at the time of sale is going to be close to nil. This applies to most cars and it needs to be broadcasted - these kinds of upgrades and mods are really just for the current owner. At the time of sale, a lot of buyers will hit pause or just won't pay for the work you've done. Something just doesn't sit well with me and this car. It could be a snowbelt beast and help save the manuals and all that, but a six year old VW with over 100,000 miles normally equals gremlins and electrical issues too numerous to list. Plus rust in New England. I like it, but I'd have to look for a crack pipe somewhere if the seller thinks he's selling at that price.
  • 2ACL I can't help feeling that baby is a gross misnomer for a vehicle which the owner's use necessitated a (manual!) transmission rebuild at 80,000 miles. An expensive lesson in diminishing returns I wouldn't recommend to anyone I know.
  • El scotto Rumbling through my pantry and looking for the box of sheets of aluminum foil. More alt right comments than actual comments on international trade policy. Also a great deal of ignorance about the global oil industry. I'm a geophysicist and I pay attention such things. Best of all we got to watch Tassos go FULL BOT on us.