By on May 24, 2011

The NY Times reports:

Manal al-Sharif, one of the organizers of an online campaign encouraging Saudi women to drive en masse on June 17, was arrested on Sunday, days after she posted video of herself flouting the kingdom’s ban on female drivers on YouTube. Traces of Ms. Sharif’s campaign also started to disappear from the Web.

Following her arrest, the YouTube video of Ms. Sharif driving became inaccessible, as did a second clip, in which she outlined how women could take part in the June 17 protest. A Facebook page she set up called “Teach Me How to Drive So I Can Protect Myself,” which had more than 12,000 fans, was deleted. The Twitter account she used to spread news of the protest movement was copied and altered to make it seem as if she had called off the campaign.

As much as we tend to value cars as the ultimate tool of personal freedom, TTAC could definitely do more to cover the plight of those banned from the roads for nothing more than their gender. Though a hugely loaded and controversial issue, it is perhaps one of the most truly principled causes at the confluence of cars and culture. We wish Ms al-Sharif the very best in her struggle to attain a right we too often take for granted.

Bonus challenge for TTAC’s Best and Brightest: can you identify the car Ms al-Sharif is driving in this clip? I’ve wasted enough time today trying to figure it out…

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

21 Comments on “Saudi Arabia Doesn’t Want You To See This Video...”

  • avatar

    1st generation Caddy CTS. I recognize those hideous air vents.

  • avatar

    Glad to see this here. This issue may be controversial in some places, but not in civilized countries.

    Ed, if you can’t identify that car, I’m not going to try, other than to say it’s not from the classic car era.

    • 0 avatar

      I admirer her courage and i hope that she shall be an example for all the woman in Saudi Arabia and women in other countries being discriminated because of their gender and religion.

      Btw she is driving a 04 Cadillac CTS-v imho.

      • 0 avatar

        Wow! I figured it looked too chintzy to be non-Nissan Japanese and checked out all the Eastern European, Korean, Iranian, and Indian stuff. Didn’t think of the CTS, but that sure seems to be the case.

  • avatar

    If we put Arab women in charge over there we wouldn’t have half the problems we do.

    • 0 avatar

      Are you sure about that? Women like hard money, which the dollar isn’t

    • 0 avatar

      I would submit that women would do better at any job (with exceptions for Michelle Bachman and Sarah Palin).

      • 0 avatar

        Last I checked both are much more successful than you so you got nothing to whine about. Get back to me when you become govenor of your state, then you have a right to make fun of your betters.

      • 0 avatar

        @ MikeAR Uh, Palin’s not a governor. She’s a quitter and a media whore with a lot of skeletons in her closet. Harrassing her brother-in-law trying to get him fired and then firing the Public Safety Commissioner she’d appointed when he wouldn’t fire the Alaska State Trooper (brother-in-law).

      • 0 avatar

        The trooper deserved to be fired. And all politicans are “media whores,” as it comes with the job. Try again.

        And saying that women are automatically better at job is silly. (Cynthia McKinney, Maxine Waters and Barbara Boxer, anyone? I hope that no one is clueless enough to point to them as shining examples of success.)

      • 0 avatar

        Potatoes, you got problems with women, seek help. You are disgusting.

  • avatar

    Frankly I think not letting women drives ranks fairly low on Saudi Arabia’s list of human rights abuses.

  • avatar
    Lynn E.

    Saudi Arabia is ruled jointly by the Saud family (politically) and by the Wahabi (religiously). The Wahabi are not real Muslims, some of their beliefs, especially their treatment of women, predate Mohammad. Mohammad attempted to change the old Arab fears about and cruelty towards women. Mohammad wanted better treatment towards women, he did NOT make them equal to men but Mohammad did want much better treatment for women.

    As an example of Wahabi teaching: Osama was taught by the Wahabi. Osama killed many non-Moslems but also killed many Muslims and treated women terribly. For these last 2 reasons he can not be considered a Muslim. Osama’s primary goal was to overthrow the Saud family and he failed at this.

    Please don’t blame the stupidity and cruelty in Saudi Arabia on Mohammad or Islam. Put the blame on a religious group that has turned its back on the hopes of Mohammad. You can also blame the Saud family for its “deal with the devil”, it is a very interesting history.

    • 0 avatar

      The Wahabbis are not the first fundamentalist group in Islam. The Spanish Inquisition was in part modeled after Almohide heresy hunters.

      If you can get the imams of Al Azhar University in Cairo to agree that the Wahabbis are not representative of Islam, you have a point, but I don’t think you’ll get that agreement.

    • 0 avatar

      History is sooo valid in explaining the present.

      Mohammad walked the earth a long time ago. Even his teachings are out-dated …

  • avatar

    Maybe they’re just trying to conserve oil.

  • avatar

    Thank you for this article/post.

    What you’re seeing is a (female) human being with more courage and self-dignity than 95% of the rest of the population. Of course, this is a difficult topic…difficult because the issues most central to the problem are a culture of male supremacy, extremist religious views, and repression of dissent.

    Of course, we deal with “kinder, gentler versions” of these very same issues in our own country…where one class/gender/religious viewpoint tries to supress the rights of others’, and/or enshrine them as second class citizens via supression, law, ballot initiative, or in deed.

    We enjoy freedoms and protections that should be (and are) the envy of much of the world, but Manal al-Sharif’s plight is a reminder of the human spirit of positive rebellion, demanding one’s equal rights, and risking one own’s freedom in an attempt to secure the rights of others. Activism in it’s highest form.

    And yes, it’s definitely a 1st gen CTS…

  • avatar
    M 1

    “TTAC could definitely do more to cover the plight of those banned from the roads for nothing more than their gender”

    Please don’t. There are plenty of other news outlets and blogs that are better suited to vying for our attention on subjects like this.

    Is it important? Yes, of course.

    Is it car-related? Only in the most tenuous, peripheral sense.

    I rarely buy into the discussion threads about whether or not a particular topic is “on message” for TTAC, but this is car-related only to the same degree that OJ Simpson’s slow-speed “chase” was car-related.

    (And before the usual crowd wastes their time to post “Skip it if you don’t like it,” again, normally I’m with you, and if this continues I probably will; but this is how conversations work, and I felt it was worth a quick comment.)

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • slavuta: I wish Stalin was his boss
  • slavuta: You beat me to it. Opinions of this dude are irrelevant. Ignore!
  • dal20402: Lou, really? Reading sources? Haven’t you figured out by now that the point is to listen to...
  • Lou_BC: “Americans will always do the right thing – after exhausting all the alternatives.” That sums up...
  • Lou_BC: There was the low brow comment about “low overpasses are racist”. I read up on where Buttigieg...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber