Texas Attorney General Blocks Speed Camera-Like Devices

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper
texas attorney general blocks speed camera like devices

Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott does not want anything even resembling a speed camera to operate in the Lone Star State. In an opinion handed down yesterday, Abbott denied the request of the city of Plano’s request to use handheld laser speed guns equipped with cameras and GPS devices on the grounds that doing so would violate a Texas law that bans automated photo radar devices.

“In construing a statute, our object is to determine and give effect to the legislative intent,” Abbott wrote. “Although a common understanding of the term automated may suggest a lack of human direction or control, the statutory definition in subsection 542.2035(b) does not so limit the phrase ‘automated traffic control system.’ Instead, any handheld laser device will meet the legislature’s definition so long as it records the speed of a motor vehicle and obtains the requisite photograph or recorded image.”

Plano’s interest in the new ticketing devices, at least initially, did not include the mailing of citations. Rather, it was meant to help gather additional evidence during a conventional traffic stop for later use in court. City leaders even convinced state Representative Vicki Truitt (R-Southlake) to bring their request to the attorney general. Truitt saw no problem with Plano’s plan, and she has a great deal of credibility on the matter as the author of the speed camera ban enacted in 2007 ( view law). Truitt’s opposition to speed cameras is rooted in the automated nature of photo radar.

“Such systems remove the discretion that would normally accompany a traditional traffic stop,” Truitt wrote to Abbott in August. “Unlike police officers, automated speed enforcement systems cannot make allowances for extenuating circumstances and presume that the owner of the vehicle is the person driving the vehicle at the time of the violation. The legislature was concerned that the accused individual may have been unaware that an infraction had occurred, reducing the individual’s ability to prepare and present a complete defense to the charges.”

Abbott’s more strict interpretation of the law is bad news for Laser Technologies Inc, the private company that had planned to introduce its product into the country’s second most populous state. The same unit is used in a fully automated mode to issue tickets in places like the UK. Despite the addition of video evidence, the device has been shown to produce “wild errors” when used with an unsteady hand.

A copy of the attorney general’s opinion is available in a 75k PDF file at the source link below.

Opinion No. GA-0846 (Attorney General of Texas, 2/28/2011)

[Courtesy: Thenewspaper.com]

Join the conversation
 1 comment
  • Hamby Hutcheson Hamby Hutcheson on Mar 01, 2011

    Technically he is wrong applying a ban the way he did. The use of a hand held gun (operated by a person pulling the trigger) is not an "automatic" test ... just like chasing down a speeder in a car (operated by a person steering the vehicle) is not "automated" in the technical term. If he wanted to ban the gun based of defective data (a shaky hand) he should of done so. By the way, how does Texas define the opposite of "automated" in detecting speeders? Hamby Hutcheson - Subject Matter Expert

  • Art Vandelay Dodge should bring this back. They could sell it as the classic classic classic model
  • Surferjoe Still have a 2013 RDX, naturally aspirated V6, just can't get behind a 4 banger turbo.Also gloriously absent, ESS, lane departure warnings, etc.
  • ToolGuy Is it a genuine Top Hand? Oh, I forgot, I don't care. 🙂
  • ToolGuy I did truck things with my truck this past week, twenty-odd miles from home (farther than usual). Recall that the interior bed space of my (modified) truck is 98" x 74". On the ride home yesterday the bed carried a 20 foot extension ladder (10 feet long, flagged 14 inches past the rear bumper), two other ladders, a smallish air compressor, a largish shop vac, three large bins, some materials, some scrap, and a slew of tool cases/bags. It was pretty full, is what I'm saying.The range of the Cybertruck would have been just fine. Nothing I carried had any substantial weight to it, in truck terms. The frunk would have been extremely useful (lock the tool cases there, out of the way of the Bed Stuff, away from prying eyes and grasping fingers -- you say I can charge my cordless tools there? bonus). Stainless steel plus no paint is a plus.Apparently the Cybertruck bed will be 78" long (but over 96" with the tailgate folded down) and 60-65" wide. And then Tesla promises "100 cubic feet of exterior, lockable storage — including the under-bed, frunk and sail pillars." Underbed storage requires the bed to be clear of other stuff, but bottom line everything would have fit, especially when we consider the second row of seats (tools and some materials out of the weather).Some days I was hauling mostly air on one leg of the trip. There were several store runs involved, some for 8-foot stock. One day I bummed a ride in a Roush Mustang. Three separate times other drivers tried to run into my truck (stainless steel panels, yes please). The fuel savings would be large enough for me to notice and to care.TL;DR: This truck would work for me, as a truck. Sample size = 1.
  • Ed That has to be a joke.