Japans Auto Industry Unites To Cope With Disaster – And The Unknown

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

There are gallant, yet disturbing news coming from Japan’s automaker front. Japanese automakers unite to cope with the disaster. “Automakers have set up a joint headquarters for support measures and are sharing damage reports and other information,” reports The Nikkei [sub]. “They have a plan that aims to provide more effective support by dividing their forces by region and building teams on the fly. Staff from, say, Toyota may end up lending a hand to a parts maker that does business with, say, Nissan.” According to the Nikkei, Japan’s automakers also have come to a “silent understanding” to not to compete for who might be first to restart production. What is causing the sudden unity amongst former bitter rivals?

Japan’s car manufacturers are nearly fully operative. Amongst the larger ones, Toyota escaped relatively unscathed. Their main base is some 200 miles south of Tokyo, well outside of the disaster zone. Nissan, except for the engine factory in Fukushima, looked ok. Then last week, Nissan’s Jatco transmission factories were damaged by a separate 6.2 earthquake. Honda was harder hit. The roof of their R&D center in Haga, Tochigi Prefecture, collapsed, killing one employee. Still, Automakers could start production. Why don’t they?

When the quake it, Honda, like all other automakers, had sent all people home. All except Purchasing. On the day after the quake, Honda Purchasing relocated to Honda’s Saitama plant. About 100 employees started calling suppliers.

“Altogether, the company has 113 suppliers in areas that reported tremors of at least 6 on the Japanese seismic intensity scale,” says The Nikkei. “As employees kept updating handwritten charts showing the extent of damage and which parts would be hard to come by, the gravity of the situation became clear.”

This is where the Nikkei story abruptly ends.

The unsaid part seems to be what is uniting Japan’s automakers. There appear to be serious problems at the supplier base.

Japan is on a holiday (Spring Equinox) today and nobody is answering telephones. Not that they would have much to say anyway.

“As the week ended, Japan’s auto companies were still struggling to get information from their thousands of suppliers around that nation — companies that also export materials and components to U.S., European and Asian customers,” writes Automotive News [sub] “In some cases, purchasing managers in Japan couldn’t even communicate with suppliers let alone assess the damage to the parts plants.“

From the little we know, the situation at many tier 2 and 3 suppliers could be grim. This, and the rolling blackouts, affects all makers. Through March 23, plant shutdowns will have caused 285,000 units of lost production amongst all Japanese automakers, says the global forecasting firm IHS. More than 100,000 of those are from Toyota.

While we are waiting to hear (and trying to find out) what really happened, the press stateside gets hysterical. “Americans have begun snapping up Toyota Prius, Honda Fit and other fuel-efficient models made only in Japan almost the way shoppers denude bread and milk shelves in a supermarket when a storm is predicted,” writes USA Today under the headline “Panic buying raises prices on Prius, Fit.” Only to report further below that according to TrueCar.com, the average price paid for a Prius in the U.S. rose $135, or 0.5%. Fit was up $21, or 0.1%.”

And there is another effect. “UAW Bob King has made organizing foreign owned “transplants” a priority,” muses CBS from Detroit. “Analysts say King may have to focus on European automakers first, while the Japanese companies get back on their feet.”

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 5 comments
  • Twotone Twotone on Mar 21, 2011

    Sounds like the beginning of a Japanese car cartel.

    • See 1 previous
    • Otterpops Otterpops on Mar 22, 2011

      That's "keiretsu," and it isn't anything like a cartel. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keiretsu It has nothing to do with controlling competition on any level where there are external sales.

  • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Mar 21, 2011

    I don't have a problem with cooperation among those manufacturers; this doesn't diminish their competition between each other. They're just trying to survive this mess, and a little cooperation is necessary.

  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
  • FreedMike If Dodge were smart - and I don't think they are - they'd spend their money refreshing and reworking the Durango (which I think is entering model year 3,221), versus going down the same "stuff 'em full of motor and give 'em cool new paint options" path. That's the approach they used with the Charger and Challenger, and both those models are dead. The Durango is still a strong product in a strong market; why not keep it fresher?
Next