UK: Speed Camera Penalties Adjusted to Meet Revenue Goals
Speed camera operators in the UK are looking to hike costs for “educational courses” and redeploy cameras to more lucrative locations to address a growing budget deficit. The options for the Thames Valley Safer Roads Partnership were discussed in an August 11 strategy meeting, the minutes for which were obtained from a freedom of information request. The partnership consists of local police agencies, local council members, the courts and the staff who run the speed cameras themselves.
The organization is reeling from a decision by Conservative government of Prime Minister David Cameron to reduce significantly national funding of automated ticketing machines — funding that flourished under the previous Labour government. The Thames Valley group was forced to deal with an across-the-board cut of 27 percent.
Reading, which contributed £125,000 (US $193,000) in 2011 funding to the partnership, gave up on its speed cameras September 27. Oxfordshire also dumped cameras earlier this year, with both actions causing severe monetary problems to the camera group.
“There is currently a budget deficit of £203,000 (US $314,000) which could rise to £265,000 (US $410,000) without Reading in the partnership,” Operations Manager Richard Owen said. “There are three possible options for savings: redundancies, increase course fees, new courses… There could be more course fees, by either increasing camera loading (we are the lowest level in the UK) or more courses — ACPO suggest extra courses for offenses between 40 and 49 MPH. One course is currently allowed every three years. Perhaps this might be changed to one every two years. Re-offenders could have a second longer education course. The suggested cost might be &80 (US $124) course with £30 (US $46) administration fee.”
The group put on 53,000 classes last year. Even the judiciary, which is supposed to be an independent arbiter of the guilt or innocence of ticket recipients, plays a significant role in the financial aspects of the partnership.
“Her Majesty’s Courts Service has a meeting planned to bring back-office staff together to discuss savings, centralizing in one office, etc,” Rob Povey of the Thames Valley Police said. “Any savings would be planned for next year and difficult to bring in this year, as changes this year would include redundancy costs. Redeployment is the first option.”
Owen also discussed the possibility of a national grant funding model that “requires all partners to agree (to) activity levels,” meaning issuing a specified minimum number of tickets in a given month to maintain revenue levels. Other structures included setting up the partnership as a charity or a non-profit organization.
Strategy Committee Meeting Minutes (Thames Valley Speed Camera Partnership, 8/11/2010)
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Wjtinfwb Poor cousin to the Blazer & Bronco that dominated this segment. The 1st Gen Ramcharger was a much better and better looking truck, with the 440 available and without the AMC Pacer style real windows. The Bronco and Blazer felt and looked much more modern and cohesive than the Mopar's, and that's not saying very much. Probably attractive to the Mopar faithful but for the rest of us... No thanks at any price.
- Not Ford will have a great reckoning with its EV production goals. Their EVs haven’t been as popular as initially anticipated and have been dealing quality issues (persistent recalls on Mach E) or disappointing performance (cold weather and towing greatly diminishing range on Lightning).Their top selling vehicle remains the ICE powered F-series. Consumers will only tolerate so much price increase as Ford tries to subsidize the massive losses it incurs with EV production. Being forced to eat profit off of 2-3 ICE F-series to offset losses from a single Lightning will quickly prove to be unsustainable business. This is the very same company that abandoned cars entirely to focus on more profitable trucks.
- LYNN DELANEY Mine is a 2001 Pure White Miata. I bought it at Concord Mazda. I love it but Imay be about to get rid of it I guess. It's been in my garage for quite awhile. Why? 1. I don't have a lot of money (I'm a retired teacher) And I've had issues with it that require financing. For example when you insert the key and turn it nothing happens. Why? I got it at Concord Mazda and somehow. it came to my condo shared garage to die and has remained such to this day. If you want to experience it you put the key in the keyhole and turn it but silence ensues and you wonder why but you know it's because the key was "programmed and it worked when you brought it home but not since.I'm told it requires a new battery but I've not had the financial energy to deal with it. I love my Miata but will I keep it? I'm unsure. Next step? Install a new battery...When it came home from Concord Mazda it was perfect for a quick minute. I tested it. I drove it around my block in Oakland, California just one time. That was the end of it. Since them I'm told it needs a new battery. It's a 2001. Shall I go ahead and splurge?
- Dusterdude @El scotto , I'm aware of the history, I have been in the "working world" for close to 40 years with many of them being in automotive. We have to look at situation in the "big picture". Did UAW make concessions in past ? - yes. Do they deserve an increase now ? -yes . Is their pay increase reasonable given their current compensation package ? Not at all ! By the way - are the automotive CEO's overpaid - definitely! (That is the case in many industries, and a separate topic). As the auto industry slowly but surely moves to EV's , the "big 3" will need to be producing top quality competitive vehicles or they will not survive.
- Art_Vandelay “We skipped it because we didn’t think anyone would want to steal these things”-Hyundai