Ohio: State Court Green Lights Traffic Camera Case

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper
ohio state court green lights traffic camera case

The red light camera program in Cleveland, Ohio faces serious legal trouble as the state’s second-highest court ruled Thursday that a class action lawsuit could proceed. In its decision, a three-judge panel of the Ohio Court of Appeals for the Eighth Appellate District overturned a county court ruling that had blocked a class action challenge to the city’s issuance of photo tickets to the drivers of leased vehicles. The appellate court insisted that the case had merit as did a federal appeals court in a separate case decision over Cleveland’s automated ticketing machines handed down last month ( view ruling).

A group of $100 ticket recipients sued Cleveland on the grounds that the municipal traffic camera ordinance did not give the city any authority to impose a fine on someone who leased his vehicle. Under the ordinance, only the “vehicle owner” was liable for a traffic fine. None of the appellants owned any vehicle photographed by Redflex Traffic Systems, the Australian company in charge of issuing tickets in Cleveland. Thus, the city unjustly enriched itself, the appellants argued, by collecting money without legal authority. Cleveland’s city attorney countered that the lawsuit should be thrown out on the grounds that the motorists paid their tickets, which is an admission of guilt. The appellate court rejected this line of thinking.

“The question before us, then, is whether appellants can prove any set of facts demonstrating that it would be unjust for the city to retain the fines appellants paid,” Judge Kenneth A. Rocco wrote. “While we recognize that the appellants had the opportunity to challenge the imposition of the fines before they paid them, this opportunity does not necessarily foreclose any right to equitable relief… Among other things, the question whether appellants were induced to pay the fines by a mistake of fact or law and whether they were coerced to pay by a threat of additional penalties may be relevant to this question.”

The appeals court found the legal issues involved were not clear cut and therefore should be argued fully in a trial court. The judges also found that it was quite possible that the facts would show the case would be appropriately certified as a class action so that every leased vehicle ticket recipient could recover the fine payments collected contrary to the law. Cleveland has modified its ordinance so that future citations will not be affected by the case.

A copy of the decision is available in a 40k PDF file at the source link below.

Lycan v. Cleveland (Court of Appeals, State of Ohio, 12/13/2010)

[Courtesy: Thenewspaper.com]

Join the conversation
 1 comment
  • Daanii2 Daanii2 on Dec 14, 2010

    The issues in the class action suit seem to apply only to leased cars. So why would the Cleveland red light camera program be in trouble? As the article itself notes, "Cleveland has modified its ordinance so that future citations will not be affected by the case." Win or lose this case, the Cleveland red light camera program will probably live on.

  • 2ACL If I'm going to battle 30-year-old BMW problems, then the car had better be representative of their greatest hits. I hear the M42 is a decent motor, but it just doesn't personify BMW excellence of the period. Also did some digging in the seller's other posts to try and determine the transmission type. . . https://www.bimmerfest.com/threads/m42b18-1994-318is-misfire-hopefully-remedied.1443915/page-2#post-13810336"Test drive was magnificent, for an automatic, it eventually gets up to speed." Free-revving four + four-speed slushbox = definite pass.
  • SCE to AUX This is good news, as long as the Tesla plug can deliver the kind of power needed in the future. I'm not sure that's a settled matter.
  • SCE to AUX Hyundai/Kia/Genesis, if we're talking mfrs of consequence in the EV space.But to their credit, they've tried to remain distinct from the Tesla approach to everything. They've been quick to respond to the Biden IRA domestic content stuff for EVs (by building more US plants), so maybe they'll jump on this NACS bandwagon.
  • FreedMike I guess it's good to hear they finally made the third row livable - the one on the old RX was a joke - but, man, is this generic-looking.
  • Alan I read the front wheels are driven by the engine and the rear wheels by electric in the hybrid. I also find it odd it isn't offered as the 2.4 hybrid with 250kw on tap.