Chart(s) Of The Day: EPA Breaks Down 35 Years Of Automotive Trends

by Edward Niedermeyer

Published: November 22nd, 2010

chart s of the day epa breaks down 35 years of automotive trends

If you love data almost as much as you love cars, you’re in for a real treat. The EPA has issued a report [ PDF here] on the last 35 years of light-duty vehicle efficiency trends, and it’s jam-packed full of fun graphs detailing the evolution of America’s car market. For example, the fuel-efficiency record of the major US-market players is laid bare in one particularly compelling collection of graphs (above). More detail on by-manufacturer efficiency over the last three years can be found here. Other fun graphs: production breakdowns by vehicle size and type, a comparison of performance and efficiency by vehicle type, and a distribution of vehicles by weight for 1975, 1988 and 2010 (weights dropped from ’75 to ’88, and are now back to nearly 1975 levels). You can also check out production share by weight to find out that the sub-2,750 lb died sometime after the year 2000. You can even see the breakdown of FWD-RWD-AWD by vehicle type and pinpoint the moment that Subaru started making an impact on the market. All told, it’s an automotive data-gasm that will leave you a lot better informed about the state of the US market. And the perfect opportunity to make sweeping generalizations about the American car market. Enjoy!

#ChartOfTheDay #FuelEconomy #Industry #NewCars

Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments

Join the conversation

5 comments

Steinweg on Nov 22, 2010

Does anyone else find it strange that vehicle safety standards have pushed weights up (I know other features have contributed), but that driver licensing has gotten no more rigorous, and you can still drive a motorcycle or an open-topped car on public highways? Does the average vehicle really need to be 4,000 lbs safe? Bring on the carbon fibre, if that's how it's got to be, but I never understood why motorcycles are A-OK while thin pillars that enhance outward vision are evil.

Like Reply
- Psarhjinian on Nov 22, 2010
  
  I don't think safety really is responsible, or at least is responsible for the increase in mass. Weight went up as we were able to make larger cars that still had good mileage and power. The "natural state" of the North American car is big and heavy, and we're just returning to that, thanks to engine efficiency. There are plenty of very safe small cars, but people aren't buying them now that you can get a big car without having to suffer with a emissions-strangled powerplant.
  
  Like
SVX pearlie on Nov 22, 2010

Interesting notes on the first graph: Subaru is the only OEM for which the Car & "Truck" mpg ratings are virtually identical. Also, fun to remember gas prices over same time period... Fact: cheap gas = lower mpg.

Like Reply
- See 1 previous
- Hurls on Nov 22, 2010
  
  Well... Subaru doesn't really make any trucks... just "SUVs" that are perhaps slightly heavier versions of their cars...
  
  Like
- SVX pearlie on Nov 22, 2010
  
  Perhaps I should taken tongue out of cheek? Subaru's trucks are lifted large cars. Tho what qualifies as a "truck" to the Feds is a lot broader than what one would otherwise expect.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

The Oracle What a rash of clunkers.
Zerofoo Not an autonomous system, but the blind spot assist in my CX-90 is absolutely flummoxed by TWO left turn lanes and shouts at me because there are cars in the lane I'm not in and have no intention of using.
Jimble AMC was hardly flush with cash when they bought Jeep. Ramblers were profitable in the early 60's but the late 60's were pretty lean years for the company and they had to borrow money to buy Jeep. Paying off that debt reduced the funds available for updating the passenger cars and meeting federal air quality and safety mandates, which may have contributed to the company's downfall. On the other hand, adding Jeep broadened the company's product portfolio and may have kept it going in those years when off roaders were selling better than economy cars. AMC had a couple flush years selling economy cars in the 70's because of oil shocks but that was after buying Jeep, not before.
Mnemic It doesnt matter who. These things are so grossly overpriced that they only need to sell a handful of them to cover the development costs. Why? Selling overpriced luxury cars is literally all of Germanys economy.
Jalop1991 nope. A broken taillight will total the car.