Peugeot and Iran. They're Staying Together
Whilst doing my usual scan of today’s news I saw an article which made me do a double take. And I mean a proper “Whaaaaaaaaat?!” I saw a couple of interesting things in it, I couldn’t believe my eyes. Then I saw who published it. The Tehran Times. So, treat this story with a pinch of salt.
A few weeks ago, I wrote about how the Iranian government was threatening to put the thumbscrews on Peugeot’s Iranian subsidiary. Possibly in an attempt to show the world how these global sanctions mean very little to them. Well, according to The Tehran Times, the Iranian government has nothing but a good friend in Peugeot.
They report that Jean-Marc Gales, an executive vice president and member of the managing board with PSA Peugeot-Citroen, has given Iran his vote of confidence. “We will proudly continue as before to do business with our Iranian partner,” he said (or “claimed” as the Tehran Times writes). First surprising thing: The French sticking two fingers up at global sanctions. That’s some ballsy stuff to say! (But then: Who was in Iraq before America moved in?)
The article then claims the second surprising element. That Iran represents 20 percent of Peugeot’s global sales. 20 percent?! That’s a lot.
Mr Gales then went on to discuss the need to increase exports of cars through Iran using the recent credit crisis as justification. “The crisis mostly troubled the U.S and Europe. Countries like Iran had no problem in this regard.” he said, “For this reason, Iran’s potential in the global market is significant and we would be content to expand our global market in the framework of enhancing our partnership.”
My first thought to all of this was that the Tehran Times wrote this story, hoping that it’ll give bad press to PSA around the world. Thereby, tightening the thumbscrews on PSA even further. But if it is all within context and accurate, I think it’s fair to say that I wouldn’t expect Peugeot (or Citroen) in America any time soon. I doubt they’ll be welcome there.
More by Cammy Corrigan
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- 28-Cars-Later Nissan will be very fortunate to not be in the Japanese equivalent of Chapter 11 reorganization over the next 36 months, "getting rolling" is a luxury (also, I see what you did there).
- MaintenanceCosts RAM! RAM! RAM! ...... the child in the crosswalk that you can't see over the hood of this factory-lifted beast.
- 3-On-The-Tree Yes all the Older Land Cruiser’s and samurai’s have gone up here as well. I’ve taken both vehicle ps on some pretty rough roads exploring old mine shafts etc. I bought mine right before I deployed back in 08 and got it for $4000 and also bought another that is non running for parts, got a complete engine, drive train. The mice love it unfortunately.
- Statikboy I see only old Preludes in red. And a concept in white.Pretty sure this is going to end up being simply a Civic coupe. Maybe a slightly shorter wheelbase or wider track than the sedan, but mechanically identical to the Civic in Touring and/or Si trims.
- SCE to AUX With these items under the pros:[list][*]It's quick, though it seems to take the powertrain a second to get sorted when you go from cruising to tromping on it.[/*][*]The powertrain transitions are mostly smooth, though occasionally harsh.[/*][/list]I'd much rather go electric or pure ICE I hate herky-jerky hybrid drivetrains.The list of cons is pretty damning for a new vehicle. Who is buying these things?
Comments
Join the conversation
Reminds me of an intensive French course I was doing in the Belgian town of Spa Bertel. I had to read a list of words which were identical in English and French to my tutor (who just happened to be both young, beautiful and on her own with me in my hotel room/ study area), to improve my vocab and pronounciation. I'd done the A words, and the B words and was making good progress on my Cs. Then I stopped and nearly choked. "Aah, you eez a tee-pee-kul man. Yew alweez miss ze blewdy clitoris!" Embarassed. Much. Stingray: I just don't think your comments critique what was said in the article. Maybe you could have pointed out that PSA don't own IKCO, that IKCO are only responsible for less than 1% of PSA's revenues. The background to the conflict between the parties is that PSA is a major supplier to OKCO, who themselves are looking to expand production internally within Iran and to other Islamic countries. The government intervention was surely only a technique to apply negotiating pressure on behal;f of a 'national industry, as is usually the case when gov'ts get involved in business.
To Bertel Schmitt, du hast alles gut verstanden, and to Tricky Dicky, c'est marrant de pouvoir s'amuser comme ca!