The Ultimate Living Dinosaur: Bristol Coupes Built On Same Platform Since 1947

Paul Niedermeyer
by Paul Niedermeyer

If TTAC were UK based, we’d probably have indulged in a Bristol Appreciation Week instead of Panthers. These remarkable coupes have been built on the same 114″ wheelbase chassis since the first Bristol 400 saw the light of day in 1947. Ok, I haven’t forgotten about Morgan. But the Morgan is a bit more self-conscious in its perpetuality. The Bristol’s styling has evolved a bit, although that seems to have ended in about, say 1978 or so? The NY Times has a nice article pointing out that Bristol sales are up, and never dropped in the current Great Recession. The very affluent who want a “bespoke” coupe hand built in traditional style seem to be able to manage the starting price of 142k pounds sterling. Oh, and there’s a real living breathing dinosaur under the hood too, and it’s American to boot.

Strictly speaking, the Bristol’s underpinnings are even older than 1947 (400 above). Bristol based their entry into the automotive world on pre-war BMWs. The frame came from the 326, and the 2 Litre six from the 328. And the grille gives that away, all too obviously. But fear not, Bristol paid a license to replicate the Bimmers.

But the current Bristol Blenheim can’t hide that obvious thirties configuration: super long hood with almost no front overhang, and rear wheels far forward, as well as a narrow track.

That long front fender hides what used to be carried in the open on classic cars: the spare. Now it’s only on one side; the other has access to the battery and fuse box. Leaves the trunk unencumbered, and with plenty of room for the golf clubs.

Needless to say, the interior is done in the most traditional of English style and taste, with only the finest appointments. And under that long hood: the old Chrysler 5.9 L/360 CID V8, which was replaced by the Hemi years ago hereabouts. Where Bristol gets them new is not disclosed. Maybe they bought a batch of the last ones to be made. At the small rate Bristol builds cars, they might last a while; decades even.

Here’s Robert Farago’s review of a “rebuilt” elderly Blenheim. But if you read it, make sure you also read the comments too, to get a more complete picture of the Blenheim.

Paul Niedermeyer
Paul Niedermeyer

More by Paul Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 52 comments
  • Mike C Mike C on Apr 02, 2012

    Had a 360 and 318 MOPAR truck and car engines in several cars in the 70sthey were similar but not the same. Truck motors had 4 bolt mians, forged cranks that were (in some cases) chemical hardened (a bath of cyanide salts) that incresed surface hardness for bearing life BUT reduced the detrimental effects on toughness and therefore logevity. THe truck 318 was aboused in a 3/4 ton pick up for 390K mile the 360 truck motor in a power wagen for over 450 k miles. Loved them The 318 car engine gutted itselfpassing a truck on the I 10 outside Cucamonga. THAT was exciting. I was doing 70 when the parts started to come through the hood. The 360 made it tio about 170K miles in a charger. then the flywheel disintigrated. The truck motors were far superior. The jensen used the 440 for most of thier life.

  • Bristol411SanFran Bristol411SanFran on Jan 11, 2013

    I have a Bristol 411 Series 3 for sale in San Francisco if anyone is interested. Contact me at richard@richardgray.org

  • HotRod Not me personally, but yes - lower prices will dramatically increase the EV's appeal.
  • Slavuta "the price isn’t terrible by current EV standards, starting at $47,200"Not terrible for a new Toyota model. But for a Vietnamese no-name, this is terrible.
  • Slavuta This is catch22 for me. I would take RAV4 for the powertrain alone. And I wouldn't take it for the same thing. Engines have history of issues and transmission shifts like glass. So, the advantage over hard-working 1.5 is lost.My answer is simple - CX5. This is Japan built, excellent car which has only one shortage - the trunk space.
  • Slavuta "Toyota engineers have told us that they intentionally build their powertrains with longevity in mind"Engine is exactly the area where Toyota 4cyl engines had big issues even recently. There was no longevity of any kind. They didn't break, they just consumed so much oil that it was like fueling gasoline and feeding oil every time
  • Wjtinfwb Very fortunate so far; the fleet ranges from 2002 to 2023, the most expensive car to maintain we have is our 2020 Acura MDX. One significant issue was taken care of under warranty, otherwise, 6 oil changes at the Acura dealer at $89.95 for full-synthetic and a new set of Michelin Defenders and 4-wheel alignment for 1300. No complaints. a '16 Subaru Crosstrek and '16 Focus ST have each required a new battery, the Ford's was covered under warranty, Subaru's was just under $200. 2 sets of tires on the Focus, 1 set on the Subie. That's it. The Focus has 80k on it and gets synthetic ever 5k at about $90, the Crosstrek is almost identical except I'll run it to 7500 since it's not turbocharged. My '02 V10 Excursion gets one oil change a year, I do it myself for about $30 bucks with Synthetic oil and Motorcraft filter from Wal-Mart for less than $40 bucks. Otherwise it asks for nothing and never has. My new Bronco is still under warranty and has no issues. The local Ford dealer sucks so I do it myself. 6 qts. of full syn, a Motorcraft cartridge filter from Amazon. Total cost about $55 bucks. Takes me 45 minutes. All in I spend about $400/yr. maintaining cars not including tires. The Excursion will likely need some front end work this year, I've set aside a thousand bucks for that. A lot less expensive than when our fleet was smaller but all German.
Next