Curbside Classic: 1965 Ford Econoline SuperVan Camper

curbside classic 1965 ford econoline supervan camper

This Econoline caught my eye for a number of reasons. These old bread boxes are getting scarce, even in Eugene. And this is one of the extended-body SuperVans, no less. But that’s not all; it has a trick in its hat. Watch this:

Yes, pop top campers are no big thing, but I hadn’t encountered one like this in a long while. No canvas here: the sides are rigid frames with windows all around. The clerestory camper. Being tall, and having memories of crawling around in the back of my ’68 Dodge A100 van makes this a very attractive proposition indeed.

The original Econoline appeared in 1960, in response to the growing popularity of the VW bus. Just like the Falcon it was loosely based on, the gen1 Falcon Van/Econoline was a highly pragmatic approach to building a compact van, compared to Chevy’s more ambitious rear-engined Corvair van (Corvan/Greenbrier). A box, a solid beam front axle in front and back, a wheezy little six between the seats, and no front crumple zone: a winning combination that is still being built around the world, although with independent front suspension. A timeless formula.

Despite all the enthusiasm about downsizing in 1960, the original Econoline ended up a bit smaller than what some folks, especially tradesmen and fleet buyers had in mind to carry their pipes and two by fours. I’m not exactly sure of the year it appeared, but Ford just grafted on a chunk on the rear end, and Presto: the SuperVan was born. It was a lot more primitive than what the competition did: Chevy and Dodge made extended wheelbase versions of their boxes. Ford was looking for a quick fix, since their idea of where their van was headed in a couple of years was already pretty clear.

The front seat in these vans was a memorable piece of primitiveness, even for the times. Just hunks of steel welded and screwed together. The padded dash on this one is a minor concession to safety that appeared on the later models. And the motor box made a handy third seat, nice and toasty in the winter.

The “regular” Econolines had the little Ford six, either the 144 or 170 cubic inch variety. They were both short on grunt, the 144 particularly so. But around the same time the SuperVan appeared (1965?) Ford also offered a “HeavyDuty” version, with the now venerable, but then brand new 240 CID “Big Six”, along with bigger 14″ wheels (instead of 13 inchers) and heavier springs.

I have vivid memories of riding in a HD Supervan, as a paperboy in Towson in 1965-1966. Our distributor drove one, and I’d hop in the back with stacks and stacks of Afternoon Sun papers. Old Econolines always evoke the smell of newsprint, and memories of ink-blackened hands.

I have to assume that the “long tail” Econolines probably had better traction, given the extra weight out back. The regular versions were notorious in the winter, with all that weight up front.

Getting enthusiastic about Econolines can be a bit challenging, but this one does it for me. If you’re an Econoline enthusiast, head here for the pickup version CC.

More new Curbside Classics here

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 17 comments
  • Nick Nick on Sep 29, 2010

    Interesting vehicles these. There was a reddish orange pickup version in my old neighbourhood. Sat for years and the guy put it up for sale when he decided to move to a condo. I remember inquiring about the price and he wanted a ridiculous sum for what it was and the shape it was in. It eventually disappeared...he either landed a sucker or someone really loved it. Can a Divco cc be far behind? I always thought they were very interesting vehicles.

  • Timothy Barrett Timothy Barrett on Oct 04, 2010

    I had a '65 Supervan that started as a school bus in the B.C. interior. Windows all around. It had loading doors (factory) on both sides. The engine had been swapped out for a 300cid inline from a '73 5 ton. With that awesome 3 speed auto that could be started from a stop in 2nd gear, and heavy lug mud/snows on the back it was like a little jeep off-road. Got it in '79 for, I think, $150. A bed, and wood stove made from the hood of a '69 GMC pick-up. Great fun camping in the mountains! Sold it in Ontario in '89 for $2800.

  • 285exp I am quite sure that it is a complete coincidence that they have announced a $7k price increase the same week that the current administration has passed legislation extending the $7k tax credit that was set to expire. Yep, not at all related.
  • Syke Is it possible to switch the pure EV drive on and off? Given the wonderful throttle response of an EV, I could see the desirability of this for a serious off-roader. Run straight ICE to get to your off-roading site, switch over the EV drive during the off-road section, then back to ICE for the road trip back home.
  • ToolGuy Historical Perspective Moment:• First-gen Bronco debuted in MY1966• OJ Simpson Bronco chase was in 1994• 1966 to 1994 = 28 years• 1994 to now = 28 yearsFeel old yet?
  • Ronnie Schreiber From where is all that electricity needed to power an EV transportation system going to come? Ironically, the only EV evangelist that I know of who even mentions the fragile nature of our electrical grid is Elon Musk. None of the politicians pushing EVs go anywhere near it, well, unless they are advocating for unreliable renewables like wind and solar.
  • FreedMike I just don’t see the market here - I think about 1.2% of Jeep drivers are going to be sold on the fuel cost savings here. And the fuel cost savings are pretty minimal, per the EPA: https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/PowerSearch.do?action=noform&path=1&year1=2022&year2=2022&make=Jeep&baseModel=Wrangler&srchtyp=ymm&pageno=1&rowLimit=50Annual fuel costs for this vehicle are $2200 and $2750 for the equivalent base turbo-four model. I don’t get it.
Next