This Time It's Serious: Berlin Says Nein Again To Opel Aid

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

We knew it would be one of Angela’s feel good meetings. Careful parsing of her statement yesterday gave the clues: “I will do everything so that the employees who were pushing for the preservation of Opel receive all possible help and support we have at our disposal.Angela hadn’t promised help for Opel. She promised to do what she can to cushion the blow to the Opel workers. Anyway, Frau Merkel met with the Premiers of the Opel states, only to tell them that the decision stands:

No help for Opel from Berlin.

“There was no breakthrough at the meeting of the Premiers of the Opel states with German Chancellor Angela Merkel,” reports DDP via Ad Hoc News. The ladies and gentlemen left the meeting “disappointed.” Hopes to find alternatives to help Opel were quickly squashed. “There was no movement at all,” complained Kurt Beck, Chief of Rhineland Palatinate, where 2300 workers have Opel jobs in Kaiserslautern.

Angela gave the states a pat on the head and the advice to help Opel out of their own pockets, if they insist. They’ll probably make some empty gestures. And then nothing will happen. Without help from Berlin, any help from the states would be wasted money.

Just listen to their comments.

Thuringia is all for help by the states, said Premier Christine Lieberknecht. Easy for her to say: Thuringia offered only €27.3m

Kurt Beck of Rhineland Palatinate warned against “creating false illusions.”

Jürgen Rüttgers of Northrhein-Westphalia said that states “are available for talks with Opel.”

Roland Koch, Chief of Hesse, where Opel has its headquarters and most of the jobs, warned against a race between the states. Opel should approach the states first.

It’s not going to happen.

Opel needs much more than the €1.1b it wanted from Germany and did not get. They wanted to collect a total of €1.8b in Europe. Any offers of cash so far came with the usual caveat: We’ll give if Berlin pays the lion’s share.

With Berlin away from the poker table, it gets increasingly silly for anybody else to sink money into moribund Opel.

The less money Opel gets, the more plants they have to close. The more plants they close, the more money they need. As long as Opel survives, letting people go will bankrupt the company (Antwerp did cost $200k a head.) The only way around being bankrupted by severance payments: Bankruptcy.

Taking Opel bankrupt and continue is tricky. There will be no bad Opel and good Opel. Wages are first in line, and a hostile government can give Opel a lot of grief, especially with a solvent parent.

Anybody believe in miracle? If not, let’s cue the appropriate music. We’ll play a different tune when Whitacre finds some money he said he was not allowed to spend.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 19 comments
  • Dave Dave on Jun 11, 2010

    Wasn't the thinking behind the cancellation of the sale to Magna that Opels expertise with small/medium cars was critical to GM? If that's the case the Germany can reasonably expect GM to rescue Opel, at least the German part of it where the engineering expertise resides. And if that means that Opel Spain, Poland and Vauxhall UK have to go, bye bye.

  • Mr Carpenter Mr Carpenter on Jun 11, 2010

    The trick will be to move appropriate production to the UK, then pull the plug on the Opel AG (or whatever the legal name is). Vauxhall can then hire appropriate engineering expertise - gasp! - and put Britons to work. Or since they are all Europeans now, the Germans with engineering expertise AND seniority can move to the UK and work at Vauxhall for a pay-cut (since after all, living standards are lower in the UK than in Germany). Alternately, GM could simply actually (gasp! what a novel frickin' idea) engineer American cars for America in America! Seriously, Opel is DEAD and has been a zombie for some while. GM should have GIVEN it away when they could. It's like a millstone around their neck. Plus, as mentioned, they cannot LEGALLY spend monies received from the US government (printed up nice and fresh as new debt for 310 million American subjects, no longer citizens). Also quite seriously, GM's other major offshore engineering center - GMDaewoo - is also on the ropes. If GM has to choose which engineering center to support (with production also nearby), will they choose a) SAIC-GM in Shanghai (low costs, high eduction levels and local sales set to permanently be higher than anywhere else in the world) b) GMDaewoo (in a nation with moderately low costs and high eduction levels, but with a somewhat failed branding and image in Daewoo now Chevrolet) c) Opel (in a nation which is obviously part of a larger Europe now very deeply in trouble economically, and liable to have multiple national economic collapses and stagnating sales, plus massive overcapacity and high costs) d) GMNA (in a nation wich is obviously on the cusp of a massive economic melt-down due to inimaginable deficits and debts, with moderately low costs, but not particularly excellent educational levels compared to the rest of the world) I guess if I were simply just were a rational "martian" looking down, the answer would obviously be "a". GM should put their money into China, even if it can only own 50% (and now only owns 49% and does not control) joint ventures there.

  • NJRide Let Cadillac be Cadillac, but in the context of 2024. As a new XT5 owner (the Emerald Green got me to buy an old design) I would have happy preferred a Lyriq hybrid. Some who really like the Lyriq's package but don't want an EV will buy another model. Most will go elsewhere. I love the V6 and good but easy to use infotainment. But I know my next car will probably be more electrified w more tech.I don't think anyone is confusing my car for a Blazer but i agree the XT6 is too derivative. Frankly the Enclave looks more prestigious. The Escalade still has got it, though I would love to see the ESV make a comeback. I still think GM missed the boat by not making a Colorado based mini-Blazer and Escalade. I don't get the 2 sedans. I feel a slightly larger and more distinctly Cadillac sedan would sell better. They also need to advertise beyond the Lyriq. I don't feel other luxury players are exactly hitting it out of the park right now so a strengthened Cadillac could regain share.
  • CM Korecko Cadillacs traditionally have been opulent, brash and leaders in the field; the "Standard of the World".That said, here's how to fix the brand:[list=1][*]Forget German luxury cars ever existed.[/*][*]Get rid of the astromech droid names and bring back Seville, Deville, Eldorado, Fleetwood and Brougham.[/*][*]End the electric crap altogether and make huge, gas guzzling land yachts for the significant portion of the population that would fight for a chance to buy one.[/*][*]Stop making sports cars and make true luxury cars for those of us who don't give a damn about the environment and are willing to swim upstream to get what we really want.[/*][*]Stop messing around with technology and make well-made and luxurious interiors.[/*][*]Watch sales skyrocket as a truly different product distinguishes itself to the delight of the target market and the damnation of the Sierra Club. Hell, there is no such thing as bad publicity and the "bad guy" image would actually have a lot of appeal.[/*][/list=1]
  • FreedMike Not surprisingly, I have some ideas. What Cadillac needs, I think, is a statement. They don’t really have an identity. They’re trying a statement car with the Celestiq, and while that’s the right idea, it has the wrong styling and a really wrong price tag. So, here’s a first step: instead of a sedan, do a huge, fast, capable and ridiculously smooth and quiet electric touring coupe. If you want an example of what I’m thinking of, check out the magnificent Rolls-Royce Spectre. But this Cadillac coupe would be uniquely American, it’d be named “Eldorado,” and it’d be a lot cheaper than the $450,000 Spectre – call it a buck twenty-five, with a range of bespoke options for prospective buyers that would make each one somewhat unique. Make it 220 inches long, on the same platform as the Celestiq, give it retro ‘60s styling (or you could do a ‘50s or ‘70s throwback, I suppose), and at least 700 horsepower, standard. Why electric? It’s the ultimate throwback to ‘60s powertrains: effortlessly fast, smooth, and quiet, but with a ton more horsepower. It’s the perfect drivetrain for a dignified touring coupe. In fact, I’d skip any mention of environmental responsibility in this car’s marketing – sell it on how it drives, period. &nbsp;How many would they sell? Not many. But the point of the exercise is to do something that will turn heads and show people what this brand can do. &nbsp;Second step: give the lineup a mix of electric and gas models, and make Cadillac gas engines bespoke to the brand. If they need to use generic GM engine designs, fine – take those engines and massage them thoroughly into something special to Cadillac, with specific tuning and output. No Cadillac should leave the factory with an engine straight out of a Malibu or a four-banger Silverado. Third step: a complete line-wide interior redo. Stop the cheapness that’s all over the current sedans and crossovers. Just stop it. Use the Lyriq as a blueprint – it’s a big improvement over the current crop and a good first step. I’d also say Cadillac has a good blend of screen-controlled and switch-controlled user interfaces; don’t give into the haptic-touch and wall-to-wall screen thing. (On the subject of Caddy interiors – as much as I bag on the Celestiq, check out the interior on that thing. Wow.)Fourth step: Blackwing All The Things – some gas, others electric. And keep the electric/gas mix so buyers have a choice.Fifth step: be patient. That’s not easy, but if they’re doing a brand reset, it’ll take time.&nbsp;
  • NJRide So if GM was serious about selling this why no updates for so long? Or make something truly unique instead of something that looked like a downmarket Altima?
  • Kmars2009 I rented one last fall while visiting Ohio. Not a bad car...but not a great car either. I think it needs a new version. But CUVs are King... unfortunately!
Next