It's Buick Again!

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer
it s buick again

As yesterday’s sales graph proves, this is not the greatest time to be re-launching an entry-luxury brand. With Kias and Fords offering the kind of tech gadgets once found only in the upper echelons of true luxury brands, and with well-regarded import luxury marques moving into the front-drive, mass-market, the so-called “premium” brands are finding themselves caught in the middle and losing sales. But in spite of these damning dynamics, GM is moving to overhaul its entry-luxe Buick brand at top speed. Why? Because it can…

Ask Buick’s paid representatives when the much-maligned brand began its turnaround, and they’ll point to the 2007 launch of the Buick Enclave. And sure, the Lambda-platform crossover helped slow Buick’s precipitous decline into “don’t trust anyone under 70” status, but the brand didn’t truly start reversing its terminal sales (and demography) momentum until the Buick LaCrosse became a fixture on showroom floors. Through the first four months of this year, the LaCrosse has already sold just under half the volume it sold in all of 2009 put together.

And no wonder: though not without its flaws, the LaCrosse is a capable mid-to-full-size car, with distinctive Buick cues like the “Sweep-Spear” character line. It manages to look more thoroughly modern than any other recent Buick, while still looking unmistakeably “American” (despite having been styled in Shanghai). Considering the dearth of modern-era inspiration for a contemporary Buick flagship, this is no small accomplishment, and it makes the LaCrosse the natural starting point for a rebirth of the brand.

Apparently though, this is not to be. Whereas the LaCrosse development team took global GM components and created a unique body that captures Buick’s traditional, professional-class values (now alive and well only in China, it seems), the plan going forward is shaping up to be far less sophisticated. With the new Regal, we are seeing the first example of what appears to be Buick’s new strategy: rebadging Opels.

With the bad-old days of badge engineering finally drawing to a close (don’t let the door hit you on the way out, Mercury), it’s being replaced with a new paradigm: global badge-engineering. Fiat-Chrysler is doing this with its Lancia and Chrysler brands, cherry-picking the best from both lineups, and selling the resulting recombination as Lancias in Europe, and Chryslers elsewhere. At GM, the practice centers on leveraging the high-quality Opel products that would otherwise remain trapped in Europe’s brutally competitive and contracting market.

But how will the decision to base Buick’s new products on rebadged Opels affect the Buick brand? At the Regal launch last week, Buick’s PR folks seemed unconcerned with this question. “The plan was always to bring this car to America,” said GM’s midsized and full-size sedan supremo Jim Federico (also VLE for Opel Insignia/Buick Regal). What’s changed is that the Saturn brand, which was going to be Opel’s American-market vessel, is now defunct. Having developed a fresh lineup for Opel, GM had to sell them as something in the US. Too good for Chevrolet (“Excellence For Everyone” tagline notwithstanding) and incompatible with Cadillac’s Art and Science styling, the only way to bring Opels stateside without major restyling was as Buicks.

And though this “market-engineering” approach is all-too reminiscent of GM’s poor past practices, the Buick strategy is surprisingly pragmatic. Instead of starting with a brand image (which, in Buick’s case was badly damaged anyway) and adapting existing technical underpinnings to it, GM is bringing high-quality European products to the US market and letting the Buick brand fall where it may. The quality of these products, say Buick’s reps, will define the Buick brand going forward, instead of the other way around.

The other side of this equation is the death of the Pontiac brand. Without Pontiac’s volume, former Buick-Pontiac GMC dealers (now just Buick-GMC stores) need something other than trucks, crossovers and mid-sized sedans to stay healthy. Buick must expand its offerings into the untested waters of the compact (C-segment) sedan and crossover segments in order to drive business to Buick-GMC showrooms and hedge against another possible gas-price spike that might otherwise scuttle the two-brand channel. Again, Opel is the obvious source of these products, offering already-developed models like the compact Astra and the subcompact Meriva MPV.

Thanks to Buick’s new emphasis on the Chinese market, we already know what comes next: a Buickified Astra sedan has already been caught on camera looking a lot like a half-sized Regal. Less of a pure Opel re-badge than the Regal, this new Jetta/Civic competitor still maintains the brand’s new Opel-bred stylistic subtlety without the sweep-spear and ventiports that make the LaCrosse so obviously a Buick. A Regal wagon is also being talked about, but with Federico telling C&D that this unpopular bodystyle would also offer diesel engines and all-wheel drive, we’re going to take the rumor with several grains of salt. Still, these vehicles confirm the momentum towards making Buick a vessel for lightly-modified Opels.

The only confirmed Buick product that bears much speculating on then, is the compact/subcompact MPV that will be the final piece of a 2013 Buick lineup of which the Regal will be the oldest product (the Enclave and LaCrosse will apparently have been refreshed by then). Referred to in-house as the “baby Enclave,” this MPV will be built alongside the Aveo at Orion Township, strongly hinting at Gamma II platform underpinnings (Buick reps say it will be “either Gamma or Delta”). Given that Buick is otherwise being revived without investing in materially new products, the picture looks clear: this MPV will be an Opel Meriva.

But will this Euro-confection retain the suicide rear doors that will surely satisfy America’s constant craving for novelty? And just as importantly, will it feature styling cues from that other another spot-on Chinese interpretation of modern Buick-ness, the Buick Business Concept? One high-up but new-to-the-job Buick exec I spoke to did not even seem to be familiar with the Business Concept. With the Business’ styling influencing the larger next-gen, Chinese-market-only GL8 minivan, and with Buick’s 2013 lineup otherwise being made up of lightly-retouched Opels, the signs seem to be pointing towards a relatively mild restyle of the Meriva.

There are plenty of very rational arguments for making Opel and Buick interchangeable between markets, the way Chrysler and Lancia will be. If you accept the reasonable premise that Opel’s products are neither Cadillacs nor Chevrolets, then the logical way to build their global volume is to market them as Buicks in the US and China (surely all reasonable people agree that GM needs another US-market brand, Opel in particular, like it needs a hole in the head). The real issue then is how distinctive GM will make the Buick versions compared to their Opel predecessors, the answer to which appears to be not much at all. And there are two reasonable arguments for this: first, that Opel’s design is subtly classy enough to embody a new Buick aesthetic, and second that the money GM might have spent differentiating Buicks will probably be spent rescuing Opel.

In other words, rather than completely re-thinking the traditional approach to entry-luxury branding, GM is simply playing the same old rebadging game across global markets instead of within a single market. That the new Buicks are simply rebadged mass-market Euro-cars is not likely to occur to many buyers, means there’s none of the traditional rebadge strategy downside. For Buick, anyway. The problem with the strategy is that Ford is practicing the exact same strategy, but with its mass-market Blue Oval brand. Rather than bringing its latest European products stateside to revive its nosediving Mercury entry-luxe brand, Ford is using its Fiesta, Focus, Kuga and C-Max to burnish its Ford brand to a shiny finish and (apparently) letting Mercury die alone. Instead of taking on Acura, Lexus and company, Buick could just as easily find itself battling with the mass-market Ford brand for customer consideration. Especially if it falls into the trap of believing that the Opel look is “Buick enough” and that new Buicks don’t need at least some kind of heritage branding element.

Of course, the new Buick-as-Opel strategy is a lot smarter than GM’s immediate post-bankruptcy plan to sell Opel and rebadge Saturns like the Vue for Buick. Once Ed Whitacre decided keeping Opel made more sense than keeping Fritz Henderson, there was no going back from the Opelification of Buick. But Ford’s apparent decision to jettison Mercury in favor of a two-brand strategy that strengthens its mass-market Ford brand seems to point out that, like Henderson, Buick might have been better left behind. Don’t get me wrong: Buick’s current strategy will absolutely strengthen the brand in the short-term (and relatively inexpensively to boot), but over the long haul it will also severely limit Chevrolet’s ability to keep up with Ford’s Euro-premium makeover. In a world of Hyundai-branded luxury cars, this will be a bad situation for GM’s most important brand to find itself in.

So, what’s the answer? As GM’s experience with brands and platforms teaches, differentiation is everything. Though the current batch of Opels are, by all acoounts, attractive, high-quality vehicles, they’re also mass-market European vehicles designed around a brand that means nothing in the US. With entry-luxury brands under assault in the US, GM has to look to the emotional power of a MINI brand to understand how to make Buick fundamentally strong enough to thrive even as Chevrolet steps up its game to keep up with Ford. Clearly the globally underleveraged Opel vehicles are the place to start, but LaCrosse, not Regal is the model to follow.

Join the conversation
4 of 45 comments
  • GarbageMotorsCo. GarbageMotorsCo. on Jun 01, 2010

    The Cruze arriving with a twist beam rear axle is a huge blunder.

    • See 1 previous
    • GarbageMotorsCo. GarbageMotorsCo. on Jun 02, 2010

      It falls into the "good enough" category that GM needs to get itself out from. The class leaders, the Civic and the Mazda 3 don't cheap out in this area and it justifies the higher pricetage. The Cruze is expected to slot above the Cobalt which goes for 13 - 17 grand in non-SS form which puts it right in range of a Civic EX and a midrange Mazda.

  • Ponchoman49 Ponchoman49 on Jun 01, 2010

    I currently drive a GM, a 2008 Chevy Impala which is consistantly bashed as one of the worst piles of shit ever devised on this site so the Buick hatred doesn't surprise me. I am not however a major GM fanboy or a fanboy of any particular make. If the car is reliable, suites my needs, is recommended by friends, is made in an award winning factory, has the room and comfort I need and has a good compromise between power and mileage then that is what I will drive. The Impala 2LT 3900 V6 I currently drive has exceeded my expectations in many areas expect lacking a few features like a telescoping wheel and some dash material is hard plastic. Still it has 64k miles now and has not been in the shop for anything other than oil changes and tires so far. If this car continues to give me such excellent service and remains tight and rattle free then I will happily but another.

  • TheEndlessEnigma $150k for GM build quality. $150k for GM parts and material quality. Yeah, that's the ticket.
  • Rusty The panther platform is one of the greatest vehicles platforms ever produced. This author is a moron.
  • Bullnuke It may be awhile before these show up on US shores. The MV Fremantle Highway has just started demo/reconstruction in Rotterdam after the large fire when transporting its last shipment of electric Porsche products.
  • Fie on Fiasler Big, fast and thirsty does not equal good. True luxury is not cobbled together by the UAW.
  • Inside Looking Out I see it as gladiator races - only one survives in virtual world.