Buick Confirms Compact Sedan, "Baby Enclave," Death Of Trim Levels, More

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Buick has confirmed long-standing rumors that it will offer a compact (Delta II) sedan (likely a rebadge of the Opel Astra) and a subcompact (Gamma II) MPV “in the near future,” reports the Detroit News.With the Regal launching this year, these two vehicles will create a Buick lineup with twice the options of its current three-car lineup. That current lineup competes in only two vehicle segments, whereas by 2013, Buick expects to compete in 47 percent of market segments with a lineup of vehicles that will all be newer than the Regal. In other words, if you think Buick’s problem is product, GM agrees with you… and it’s revamping the brand’s entire lineup over the next three years.

But big expenditures at GM always have to be matched with big goals. Buick-GMC sales boss Brian Sweeney chops the sales just right and tells the DetN that

Buick is the fastest growing brand in the industry, and we expect to double our sales in the next few years.

In fact, according to Sweeney, all this growth is downright problematic:

We’re growing fast, but we don’t want to grow too fast

Because why would GM want to return Buick to its pre-2003 volume too soon? Selling 400k Buicks each year would just be a hassle. But will a Cruze-based sedan and an Aveo-based MPV really return that kind of volume to the brand? Based on earlier flirtations with compact and subcompact Buicks (and rebadged Astras), the answer would probably be no. And neither seem likely to improve Buick’s premium pedigree either, as the MPV will probably be built alongside the new Aveo at Orion Township, and the Astra will face tough in-house competition from the cheaper Chevy Cruze which will be available with GM’s most premium compact engine, the 1.4 turbo and new, upmarket interior options. But hey, either would be better than the previously-mooted “ Vuick” Saturn Vue rebadge.Besides, Buick has a strategy to improve its upmarket perception: getting rid of trim levels. Starting in 2012, Buick will ditch the confusing “CX,” “CXL,” and “CXS” trim-level designations because, as Buick-GMC Advertising honcho Craig Bierley tells Automotive News [sub]:It isn’t befitting a premium brand. No other premium brand has those designations. It implies a hierarchy — that there’s a cheap one, a middle-level one and a really, really nice one.Heaven forfend, right? So is Buick going Acura-style and making everything but navigation standard? Oh hell no. Take it away, AN [sub]:Instead, the brand will offer a few packages with increasing content levels that build on each other, Bierley told GM employees today at an event outlining the Buick brand’s positioning.

“When you get the second package, you get everything that’s in the first package, plus the second package,” he told reporters after the event. “You can’t go in and layer on the stuff that’s in the third package on the first package. You have to walk up the ladder.”

Customers will also be able to add select features to their package, such as sunroofs, navigation systems or larger wheels, he said.

Gosh, that sounds awfully hierarchical, doesn’t it? In fact, it sounds remarkably similar to the system that’s currently in place, only with more rules and no alphabet-soup nomenclature. But there is one other change that’s coming to Buick:The base models will likely include more content than they do today, Bierley said, including large, color displays for electronics. That would probably increase the price of base models, he said.

“It isn’t our stated goal to raise all our base prices over time,” he said. But “to give customers the content they want is absolutely key.”

So raising the price of entry for the brand that’s supposed to represent “luxury value” isn’t a stated goal, but it’s going to happen anyway? Maybe someone should tell Sweeney, who explains to the DetN that:Buick has “almost entirely dropped out of golf”… Instead, it will focus on more grass-roots campaigns and search for customers who shop at Whole Foods and Ikea and drink coffee at Starbucks. These are consumers who want luxury but don’t always want to pay luxury prices.Despite all the money, effort and PR GM is pouring into Buick, the more we hear about the brand and its new plans, the more confused we become. How do you rescue a brand from irrelevance if it’s supposed to all things to all value-oriented luxury buyers? Even Buick’s dealers can’t agree to update their facilities to a brand-uniform look, as Wards [sub] reports that only 400 of Buicks 2,054 dealers have signed on to the overhaul. If GM is serious about making this brand work, someone needs to grab Buick by the scruff of the neck and whip some focus, discipline and identity into it. Otherwise it will be out of the vague-and-ignored frying pan, and into the vague-and-ignored fire. But hey, at least then Sweeney won’t have to worry about “too much” sales growth.
Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 68 comments
  • Mjz Mjz on May 07, 2010

    Opels rebadged as Saturns were not successful because Saturn was NEVER a premium brand that would support it. Buick has always been a more upscale brand that people will pay extra bucks for. That's why the Buick Regal at $26,000-$30,000 will be more succesful than if it was marketed as a Saturn Aura. The new small Astra based sedan (please don't call it Excelle) looks good and will fill a niche for those looking for a more upscale small car that gets 40 mpg on the highway. If the Germans can do small can do small Audis/BMWs/Mercedes, certainly Buick can do the same. Regarding the trim levels, it's the same thing Lincoln is doing, their Premium and Ultimate packages.

    • Wagen Wagen on May 07, 2010

      Re: Buick doing the same thing as Lincoln . . . at least Buick seems to have the wisdom not to stick a badge on the car that says "Premium" or "Ultimate" as I remember seeing on so many Sables and Town Cars. Can you imagine if BMW did the same? Under the 535i badge on the trunk lid, one could have tons of badging bling: "Premium," "sport," "cold weather," "convenience," "dynamic handling," "driver assistance," etc.

  • Panzerfaust Panzerfaust on May 07, 2010

    "Buick has “almost entirely dropped out of golf”… Instead, it will focus on more grass-roots campaigns and search for customers who shop at Whole Foods and Ikea and drink coffee at Starbucks. These are consumers who want luxury but don’t always want to pay luxury prices." Looks like they're still chasing the 70-90 year old demographic.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next