News Flash: Unintended Acceleration Can Happen To Anyone!

by Sajeev Mehta

Published: March 26th, 2010

news flash unintended acceleration can happen to anyone

Paul Niedermeyer is not alone. Well, it’s a little different this time. Here’s exhibit one: the pedal assembly from my 1988 Mercury Cougar XR-7. Far from your average Reagan-era Yank Tank (and kudos if you spot all three modifications) the Cougar sat around for a year while I was hunting for parts, waiting for arrival and installing them.

So, after a brief re-acquaintance with the Foxiest of Fox Body Cougars, I went for a normal commute on a totally normal day. But I hadn’t driven the Cougar in a while. And time was not on my side on this day.

Even worse, I was mulling over personal problems yet to be resolved. At the wrong moment: I put the Cat in reverse, let out the clutch and motored out the driveway. Paying attention to my neighbor’s E36 M3 parked behind me, I hit the brakes in preparation for a quick move back to first gear. The only problem? I hit the accelerator instead. HARD.

The old 5.0L mill revved to 4500 rpm before I realized what the hell happened. It left me completely dumbfounded. If it wasn’t for my left foot firmly on the clutch, it would have been a bad day for two cool cars on a quiet suburban street. Take a look at the picture again: the brake doesn’t look close to the throttle, but my foot can easily press both at the same time. So what makes the Cougar a decent heel-and-toe machine also makes it easy to confuse the brake for the gas. Now I know how drivers of the Audi 5000 felt back in the day.

Well, not the ones who sued Audi for their troubles: this is a 22 year old car, after all. And I thought a total car dork like myself would know better. Too bad operator error happens to anyone, floor mats or electronic throttle cables be damned. Like they say in Driver’s Ed, prepare for anything behind the wheel. Spot potential threats early. Most importantly, understand the risk lurking behind your actions and take responsibility for them. Because, like it or not, everyone is responsible for their actions.

#Pedals #Safety #SignOfTheTimes #UnintendedAcceleration

Sajeev Mehta

More by Sajeev Mehta

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 20 comments

Johnny ro on Mar 26, 2010

I crashed my KH250 triple once with uncontrollable WOT. I fired it up, clutch in, side stand up, feet up, WOT, dump clutch, let off throttle, hold on for dear life, grab clutch on the way down, crawl to bike, turn off switch. I had been fooling with bars and cables and used up all the slack (or had too much I forget) and tightened it all up and then when I went wide open throttle cable housing pulled out of carbs and locked WOT. I was glad nobody was watching. Didn't think to sue anybody.

Like Reply
Notfitforhumanconsumption on Apr 01, 2010

Several years ago I was test driving a VW Passat GLS (V6), when I decided it would be fun to push the gas nearly to the floor for a few seconds. However, when I lifted my foot, the pedal didn't go with it. I had about fifteen seconds to stop the car before a red light intersection ahead and my gut reaction was simply to stand on the brakes. Not only did the brake force overwhelm the engine force, but after a few seconds of the two systems battling each other, the computer seemed to figure our what was going on and cut the power to the engine until I lifted off the brake again. At that point I simply turned the car off. Turns out that the gas pedal had become jammed under the corner of the floor mat (sound familiar?). When I returned the car I warned the owner that she may want to do something about the mat but she simply looked at me in disbelief.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.