Curbside Classic: 1992 Subaru SVX

Paul Niedermeyer
by Paul Niedermeyer
curbside classic 1992 subaru svx

Always hankered for a Citroen? The Subaru SVX is the closest thing we’ve gotten to one these past few decades. I find the resemblance to the XM more than coincidental. Which is a bit odd (or not) considering that the XM beat the SVX to the market by a few years (1989). And the XM was styled by Bertone, while arch-rival Giorgetto Giugiaro’s Ital design did the SVX. A case of great minds thinking alike? Or just the styling cliches de jour? Given the Subaru’s “aircraft-inspired glass-to-glass canopy” with the very unusual windows within windows, the SVX was actually more “Citroen” then the real thing. No wonder it’s such a curious oddity today.

A replacement for the almost-equally “progressive” XT Coupe (coming to CC soon), the SVX was an ambitious attempt to show the world that Subaru could do more than crank out funky little AWD wagons for Vermonters and Oregonians. It turned out to be too ambitious, especially at its price. The LSL version stickered at $28k in ’92 ($42k adjusted). That was problematic, given that it appeared in the middle of a recession. The SVX never lived up to Subaru’s sales expectations, and only some 14k of them were sold during its five years (’92-’97) on the US market.

The SVX’s engine was a further development of the boxer six that first showed up in the XT6 a few years earlier. Now it sported DOHC heads and 3.3 liters, but its 230 hp weren’t exactly earth shattering, even for the times (and price). And due to its struggle with weight (3600 lbs), performance was more garde than avant. Zero to sixty came in 7.3 seconds; the quarter mile in 15.4/92 mph. Obviously, the SVX wasn’t going to offer the performance to bucks ratio of a Mustang GT.

Subaru’s manual transmission wasn’t up to the H6’s twist, so it was automatic only. The word on the street is that the automatic is overstressed too, and very fragile. Buyer beware! And although conceived of as an AWD all-the-time coupe, Subaru sold some FWD versions during ’94-’95 in an effort to keep the price down. It was still too steep, and the market for cars like this was just melting away during the nineties.

It’s said that Subaru lost some $3k per SVX sold, or a total of $75 million. But a major part of its existence was to be a halo car, and in that respect, those numbers aren’t exactly terrible. The next Subaru coupe, the Toyabaru, will presumably hit the sporty coupe market closer to the sweet spot, with competitive prices. And the SVX will increasingly be seen as the unique oddity it always was, the Japanese Citroen.

Join the conversation
2 of 46 comments
  • Phxmotor Phxmotor on Mar 29, 2014

    I remember when this post first came out a few years ago. I wondered then why anyone who had ever not owned an SVX would advise against owning one. I can assurevprospectivevbuyers. Go ahead! You'll love bit! In 2010 we had Just gotten back to Calif ( northern calif the real California) from 2 years in Ohio and SE Michigan. I I Bought a "tuxedo" black & white 93 within a few months of returning. Great car. No problems at all. In northern Calif we have no rust. Went to AZ State and obviously there's no rust there either. But boy oh boy you upper Midwesterners do indeed face rust. It's nuts. Cars that last 50-60 years in rust free America don't last 15-20 in that upper Midwest salt laden ice and snow mess you call winter. Here we get a lot more snow (in the Sierra mountains anyway) than anyone in the Midwest gets... but salt is illegal on California roads.... so we just do not suffer rust. So: here's my point: As long as it comes from a rust free part of America the Subaru SVX is a fine car. Yes you must find one with a new transmission. Yes... do that .... it's because the mostly reliable 4EAT just gets beaten to death by many SVX drivers and yes... then eventually it does give up the ghost. The clutch discs just plain wear out. So what? So... ...if you replace it once every 100k it's part of ownership. And it doesn't have to cost more than about $1,500 if you can find the right shop. me!..... ......everything else is fine. If you can find a good one from rust free America buy it! Stay away from one brought into a rust free area from the rust States. Avoid them. Then... things like rear wheel bearing will not need constant replacing. And now that radiators are cheap thanks to 1-800-Radiator... all the mainline parts chains now have cheap radiators. The only thing we've needed in four years is an alternator. BFD.oh and maybe a battery. Yep we did buy one, that's right. The engine is freakin bulletproof. And the big thing that's been unmentioned in this thread is that this engine... because it's a stretched 2.2 it's non-interference and the head on the 3.3 is hyper reliable. No one ever complains about this engine. The HVAC system is worry free it's wonderful. I have no idea why my newer Outback(s) don't have this automatic temp control system. It's great. All this talk about how an SVX is an unreliable car. And it's by people who don't own one. Well I've owned a couple. And believe me... once the trans is replaced and maybe a rear wheel bearing (all of a two hr repair big deal) then the SVX is a wonderfully reliable car that's a joy to drive. And as far as high number of repairs: nope. Just isn't true. It's a great car and it really is cheap to keep on the road. If you can fix most small things it just isn't a costly car to own. Last point: you can't go anywhere without turning heads... without people asking about it with envy in their voices. It's an amazing car. Especially from 20mph to about 130. It's an amazing car in everything except off the line. Take it easy until it gets to about 20 mph then let loose. Have fun! And be careful. :)

  • Phxmotor Phxmotor on Mar 29, 2014

    Oh... I've owned three Citroens in my time too. A long time ago. An ID19 and a couple DS21's. Talk about amazing cars. If parts were available id be driving one now. But powerhouses they never were. The vom

  • Nrd515 Usually for me it's been Arby's for pretty much forever, except when the one near my house dosed me with food poisoning twice in about a year. Both times were horrible, but the second time was just so terrible it's up near the top of my medical horror stories, and I have a few of those. Obviously, I never went to that one again. I'm still pissed at Arby's for dropping Potato Cakes, and Culver's is truly better anyway. It will be Arby's fish for my "cheat day", when I eat what I want. No tartar sauce and no lettuce on mine, please. And if I get a fish and a French Dip & Swiss? Keep the Swiss, and the dip, too salty. Just the meat and the bread for me, thanks. The odds are about 25% that they will screw one or both of them up and I will have to drive through again to get replacement sandwiches. Culver's seems to get my order right many times in a row, but if I hurry and don't check my order, that's when it's screwed up and garbage to me. My best friend lives on Starbucks coffee. I don't understand coffee's appeal at all. Both my sister and I hate anything it's in. It's like green peppers, they ruin everything they touch. About the only things I hate more than coffee are most condiments, ranked from most hated to..who cares..[list=1][*]Tartar sauce. Just thinking about it makes me smell it in my head. A nod to Ranch here too. Disgusting. [/*][*]Mayo. JEEEEZUS! WTF?[/*][*]Ketchup. Sweet puke tasting sludge. On my fries? Salt. [/*][*]Mustard. Yikes. Brown, yellow, whatever, it's just awful.[/*][*]Pickles. Just ruin it from the pickle juice. No. [/*][*]Horsey, Secret, whatever sauce. Gross. [/*][*]American Cheese. American Sleeze. Any cheese, I don't want it.[/*][*]Shredded lettuce. I don't hate it, but it's warm and what's the point?[/*][*]Raw onion. Totally OK, but not something I really want. Grilled onions is a whole nother thing, I WANT those on a burger.[/*][*]Any of that "juice" that Subway and other sandwich places want to put on. NO, HELL NO! Actually, move this up to #5. [/*][/list=1]
  • SPPPP It seems like a really nice car that's just still trying to find its customer.
  • MRF 95 T-Bird I owned an 87 Thunderbird aka the second generation aero bird. It was a fine driving comfortable and very reliable car. Quite underrated compared to the GM G-body mid sized coupes since unlike them they had rack and pinion steering and struts on all four wheels plus fuel injection which GM was a bit late to the game on their mid and full sized cars. When I sold it I considered a Mark VII LSC which like many had its trouble prone air suspension deleted and replaced with coils and struts. Instead I went for a MN-12 Thunderbird.
  • SCE to AUX Somebody got the bill of material mixed up and never caught it.Maybe the stud was for a different version (like the 4xe) which might use a different fuel tank.
  • Inside Looking Out Scandinavian design costs only $600? I mean the furniture.