Virginia: New Form Of Photo Ticketing Proposed
A pair of lawmakers want to bring a unique form of photo enforcement to Virginia. The state Senate yesterday voted 40-0 to expedite consideration of legislation introduced by state Delegate Tom Rust (R-Herndon) and Senator Mark Herring (D-Leesburg) allowing the use of automated ticketing machines to fine people up to $600 for driving on a road without a state-approved purpose. The cameras are similar to those that photograph vehicles accused of using a toll road without paying. In this case, however, the cameras would be deployed on a free, fourteen-mile road adjacent to a toll route designed solely for the use of people driving to Dulles international Airport. The owners of cars infringing the proposed law would be mailed a “bill” in the mail.
“In the event a violation of the authority regulation is identified via the photo-monitoring system or automatic vehicle identification system, the operator of the Dulles Access Highway shall send a bill in the amount of the fine plus the applicable administrative fee to a registered owner of a vehicle as part of the enforcement process prior to seeking further remedies under this section,” House Bill 1295 states.
Under existing statutes, drivers who have “airport business” may use the access highway. Such purposes are not clearly defined, but the airport grounds include a hotel and gas station that many frequently use in order to escape the increasing cost of the adjacent toll route. Because a machine is unable to determine purpose, Rust and Herring’s bill would automatically convict any vehicle owner who receives a bill in the mail.
“Proof of a violation of the authority regulation governing the use of the Dulles Access Highway shall be evidenced by information obtained from the photo-monitoring system,” HB1295 states. “It shall be prima facie evidence that the vehicle described in the summons issued pursuant to this section was operated in violation of the authority regulation governing use of the Dulles Access Highway.”
The law admits no defense to the charge made against the vehicle owner other than proving the car had been stolen or supplying the name of someone else who may have been driving.
The Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority would use a private vendor to collect the fines which start at $50 for a first violation, rise to $200 for a second, $350 for a third and $600 for a fourth. It is quite possible to obtain four violations, worth a total of $1200, by unknowingly using the road before receiving any notice from the airport authority.
Rust’s bill was assigned to a House Transportation subcommittee on Sunday. A copy of his legislation is available in a 155k PDF file at the source link below.
House Bill 1295 (Virginia General Assembly, 1/21/2010)
More by The Newspaper
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- THX1136 Well, at least these won't cost over $210K like the Revology Mustangs.
- Daniel People are just going to believe what they *want* to believe to fit their narrative. Yes, those who drive more than 200 miles on a regular basis shouldn't get an EV as their main vehicle for now, but for around town and commuting they work great. Go with a lease for now to try one out, trickle charge at home and use the PlugShare app to find public chargers, many of which are free. And that's for those well-off, for those lower middle class, there are tons of rebates for the car AND having level 2 charger installed at home. I am a full-on auto enthusiast for over 35 years since an early teen and I have already been through the death of affordable sporty cars and the manual transmission. So I made sure to test drive them first, was very happy with the power, surprisingly good handling, and the paddle shifters for regen levels are nearly identical to me using the paddle shifters to engine brake in my last ICE car. I'll always love the great ICE vehicles too, but I'm actually saving money driving an even faster EV than my last car with free charging and relatively low electric rates in my area.
- HotRod The Tunnel Turn at the "Tricky Triangle" (Pocono Raceway). I got to push a Nascar-style Dodge Intrepid harder than I ever imagined. I was miserable with shingles at the time, making the experience that much more memorable. But for a handful of laps I didn't feel anything but pure adrenaline.
- Redapple2 That is one busy face. Ford: Too much.
- SCE to AUX The video in the link is pretty damning, but the fix should be a simple mechanical repair. A code patch won't do it.
Comments
Join the conversation
I'm missing something, how does the camera "know" your on official airport use? I can pick from DCA, BWI and IAD with IAD being the farthest at 50 miles.. Both DCA and BWI are serviced by mass transit got to wait till at least 2016 for the Metrorail extension.
This is kind of a whine, folks. Unlike everyone else who has commented -- apparently -- I was around when this thing was built, which was 1962 when Dulles airport was opened. At that time, the airport was "in the sticks" and the DC suburbs did not extend outside of the capital beltway. The Dulles Access road ran between the capital beltway and the aiport, period. For more than a decade, the airport was hugely under-utilized; and the Dulles Access road was a great place to go and find out just whose car was really fast because there was no one else on the road -- and no police. The road was designed for 65 mph speeds (that was the original speed limit, reduced to 55 in the first "energy crisis" and never subsequently raised) so triple-digit speeds were not a suicidal idea. In fact, as late as 1987, I claimed the unofficial record for getting to the airport from downtown DC (via the access road and US route 66) of 20 minutes, for the 26 mile distance -- and that was in the afternoon, not at 3:00 a.m. This was achieved, in part, by triple digit speeds on the access road, something which was entirely possible -- and reasonably safe to do -- at the time. Given today's level of traffic at any time other than 3:00 a.m., it would not be safe. Of course, since that time, the utilization of Dulles Airport has gone way up, and the airport has been repeatedly expanded. All of this means that the volume of airport traffic on the access road has gone way up. As a not infrequent user of that road to catch evening flights out of town, the last thing I want is a bunch of commuters clogging the road and delaying my trip to the airport. So, I don't have much sympathy for commuters who get nailed for using the Dulles Access road, regardless of how it is accomplished (although the details of how this is going to work elude me). And, "findude" is correct, the Dulles Access road is not part of the public highway system, paid for by highway fuel tax dollars. It was paid for as part of the original construction of the airport and is operated and patrolled by the Washington Area Airport Authority, which also operates Reagan National Airport on the Potomac River across from DC. Eventually, growth in offices and residences followed in the direction of the airport and the parallel toll road was built -- and was, from the beginning, a toll road. That's how it was paid for.