Breaking: Saab Sold To Spyker

Paul Niedermeyer
by Paul Niedermeyer
breaking saab sold to spyker

Who would have thought, after the eulogizing and pessimistic reports? GM has just announced that they have reached an agreement to sell Saab to Spyker. GM did not disclose financial details. Reuters asked its “source familiar with the matter.” The source said Spyker would buy Saab for $400m. A paltry $74m is in cash, the rest is deferred shares. The deal is not completely clinched: It is subject to a Swedish government guarantee on a €400m ($564m) loan from the European Investment Bank. Sweden told GM, it is looking into the matter. GM’s press release is after the the jump. Meanwhile, we’ll try to find out what it took to bring Lazarus back from the dead. Or how likely it is to really happen this time. Haven’t we been here before?

GM Reaches Agreement to Sell Saab to Spyker


DETROIT – General Motors and Spyker Cars NV today confirmed that they have reached a binding agreement on the purchase of Saab Automobile AB.

“Today’s announcement is great news for Saab employees, dealers and suppliers, great news for millions of Saab customers and fans worldwide, and great news for GM,” said John Smith, GM vice president for corporate planning and alliances.

“General Motors, Spyker Cars, and the Swedish government worked very hard and creatively for a deal that would secure a sustainable future for this unique and iconic brand, and we’re all happy for the positive outcome,” Smith said.

As part of the agreement, Spyker intends to form a new company, Saab Spyker Automobiles, which will carry the Saab brand forward. The sale will be subject to customary closing conditions, including receipt of applicable regulatory, governmental and court approvals. Other terms and conditions specific to the sale will be disclosed in due time.

The Swedish government is at present reviewing the transaction and the related request for guarantees of a Saab Automobile loan that has been requested from the European Investment Bank. Assuming quick action, the transaction is expected to close in mid-February, and previously announced wind down activities at Saab will be immediately suspended, pending the close of the transaction.

“Throughout the negotiations, GM has always had the hope to find a solution for Saab that would avoid a wind down of the brand,” added Nick Reilly, president, GM Europe. “We’ve worked with many parties over the past year, including governments and investors, and I’m very pleased that we could come to such a good conclusion, one that preserves jobs in Sweden and elsewhere. GM will continue to support Saab and Spyker on their way forward.”

GM did not disclose financial details. Reuters asked its “source familiar with the matter.” The source said Spyker would buy Saab for $400m. A paltry $74m is in cash, the rest is deferred shares.

The deal is not completely clinched: It is subject to a Swedish government guarantee on a €400m ($564m) loan from the European Investment Bank. Sweden told GM, it is looking into the matter.

Join the conversation
2 of 48 comments
  • Tparkit Tparkit on Jan 27, 2010

    Try thinking about it like this: - GM did not "sell" Saab. At best, GM gave it away. Most likely: GM partnered with the Swedish government to pay Stryker to take it. - Don't be fooled by the $74 million figure. It's a safe bet GM sugared the balance sheet to convince Stryker that Stryker can come out ahead on this after Saab fails. - No public sector lender would put a wooden nickle into this heap of crap. That's why the Swedish government guarantees were necessary. - Look for continued GM "involvement". Translation: The US taxpayers will funnel money to Stryker via GM investments in what will be presented as a glowing high-tech clean green automotive leader. - Giving Stryker money to "buy" Saab is what is floating this deal. ANY deal for ANY car company or division can be made to work if Washington puts enough cash on the hood. That's why we should never be surprised when Lazarus pops up. He's still dead, but he can be made to walk a short distance to a new grave located on someone else's property. - What's the goal of all this? To allow Government Motors/Washington to avoid the stink of failure and financial loss. I can hardly wait for the spin: free markets are at work, Obama & co believe in the private sector and have begun the process of divesting themselves of an albatros they were forced to rescue out of a sense of duty, and GM is again proving it knows how to play on the world stage.

  • Power6 Power6 on Jan 27, 2010

    Too much romaticizing of SAAB and they aren't even dead yet! Fact is worldwide car production capacity needs to contract and here is a good opportunity. Keeping the lights on another few months without a real plan is not "saving" any jobs. Saab is gone already. The key was put between the seats so the gearshift could be locked instead of the steering wheel. The original SAAB engineers would probably move it to the dash. Nowadays the ignition is still between the seats to make SAAB drivers feel special. Sorry tradition does not make a good replacement for innovation. I just don't see any place for SAAB to go back to the ways that brought them up in the world. It will be hard for them to make it as a bit player. I'd love to see something other than a reskinned GM platform from them though.

  • ToolGuy CXXVIII comments?!?
  • ToolGuy I did truck things with my truck this past week, twenty-odd miles from home (farther than usual). Recall that the interior bed space of my (modified) truck is 98" x 74". On the ride home yesterday the bed carried a 20 foot extension ladder (10 feet long, flagged 14 inches past the rear bumper), two other ladders, a smallish air compressor, a largish shop vac, three large bins, some materials, some scrap, and a slew of tool cases/bags. It was pretty full, is what I'm saying.The range of the Cybertruck would have been just fine. Nothing I carried had any substantial weight to it, in truck terms. The frunk would have been extremely useful (lock the tool cases there, out of the way of the Bed Stuff, away from prying eyes and grasping fingers -- you say I can charge my cordless tools there? bonus). Stainless steel plus no paint is a plus.Apparently the Cybertruck bed will be 78" long (but over 96" with the tailgate folded down) and 60-65" wide. And then Tesla promises "100 cubic feet of exterior, lockable storage — including the under-bed, frunk and sail pillars." Underbed storage requires the bed to be clear of other stuff, but bottom line everything would have fit, especially when we consider the second row of seats (tools and some materials out of the weather).Some days I was hauling mostly air on one leg of the trip. There were several store runs involved, some for 8-foot stock. One day I bummed a ride in a Roush Mustang. Three separate times other drivers tried to run into my truck (stainless steel panels, yes please). The fuel savings would be large enough for me to notice and to care.TL;DR: This truck would work for me, as a truck. Sample size = 1.
  • Art Vandelay Dodge should bring this back. They could sell it as the classic classic classic model
  • Surferjoe Still have a 2013 RDX, naturally aspirated V6, just can't get behind a 4 banger turbo.Also gloriously absent, ESS, lane departure warnings, etc.
  • ToolGuy Is it a genuine Top Hand? Oh, I forgot, I don't care. 🙂