Curbside Classic CA Vacation Edition: 1965 Chrysler New Yorker

Paul Niedermeyer
by Paul Niedermeyer
curbside classic ca vacation edition 1965 chrysler new yorker

Why exactly does this car create such a powerful response (in me, anyway)? It projects such solidity, dignity, and self-assurance. It flew in the face of GM’s 1965 coke-bottle styling, and showed that hard-edged angularity still had some serious life in it. Most of all though, this Chrysler New Yorker represents a pinnacle: never again would the New Yorker attain this degree of success, prestige and quality.

The Virgil Exner years at Chrysler were a styling roller-coaster ride. He resurrected Chrysler from the stodgy, boxy K.T. Keller years and set it on the path toward styling leadership with the radical ’57 models. But he took the hit for the strange 1962 models, and his Exneruberance was a bit too wild or overdone at times, like his persistence in grafting fake-spare tire covers on the trunks of everything from Valiants to Imperials. By 1961, too much of Chrysler’s sales woes were blamed on Ex, and it was time to exit.

Elwood Engel was recruited from Ford, where he was credited with the mile stone 1961 Lincoln. It’s angularity and compact elegance laughed in the face of the over-wrought finned Caddys. Engel brought a radical change in styling direction to Chrysler, and in its first few years, like so many new starts, it worked like a charm.

The first sign of the new direction was manifest in the very T-Birdish Turbine Car of 1963. It took a few more years for Engle’s angularity to come to full fruition at Chrysler, and it arrived just as GM was heading the opposite direction. And Ford was chasing the Pontiac look. Eventually, it led Chrysler into a dead end, and the radically different fuselage Chryslers of 1969 were seen to be the way out. It wasn’t, despite their strangely appealing qualities. By 1974, Chrysler was back to a boxier, edgier look, hoping to recapture the success of the ’65 – ’66 models, without avail.

One of the first Curbside Classics was a ratty, rusty 1965 Chrysler Newport coupe. This stately New Yorker that I found on a walk in Millbrae is every bit its opposite: a remarkably superb car to be sitting out front. I could practically feel its presence over a block away, standing out among the curvaceous little cars around it like the Chrysler Building in a trailer park.

These Chryslers were some of the best built cars carrying that name since its WWII tanks, and the passenger tanks it built just after the wa r. The unibody was tight, the torsion-bar suspension lacked the floaty feel of its competitors, and interior and trim quality would never again be this solid. But don’t be fooled into thinking this barge was overly heavy: at 4,295 lbs, it weighed exactly the same as a “compact” 2009 Saturn Vue. With 340 horses (gross) on tap from its 413 CI V8, these Chryslers hustled down the road effortlessly. Brakes were better than average for the times, and the Torqueflite tranny was best in class. Chrysler’s numb power steering was the only fly in the ointment, but for its intended purpose, who cared?

Chryslers appealed to buyers who still felt that a finer engineered car was the one to buy. There were several relatives and University acquaintances for whom these vintage Chryslers were the last American cars they ever bought; they all drove Mercedes by the mid seventies. Now that I think of it, that’s the reason why I hold these Chryslers in such high esteem: they really were the end of the road in more ways than one for Chrysler.

More new Curbside Classics here

Join the conversation
2 of 59 comments
  • Buffaloguy Buffaloguy on May 27, 2011

    First car I drove was my dad's gold on gold 65 New Yorker 4 door hardtop - identical to this one other than color. Loaded with every option but a/c - not really needed in Buffalo! That 413 4bbl was a monster and it was solid as a tank, but steering was super light and twitchy. One feature I thought neat at the time was the fender mounted turn signal indicators - those small chrome darts on top of the leading edge of the front fenders. Dad was a Chrysler man as far back as I recall beginning with Dodges (48 & 52) and moving up to Chryslers with a 55 Windsor and 59 Saratoga (with swivel buckets!) sedans. Moved up again to New Yorker sedans in 61 & 63, and finally hardtops in 65 & 67 (next best thing to a 2 door or convertible for a teenage wannabe motorhead). Believe the 65 cost @ $4600 and the 67 @ $4800. He retired and "downsized" to a couple of late-60s Fury IIIs before passing on. I actually think Chrysler has begun to recapture that mid-60s feel with the RWD/AWD 300s, but time will tell.

  • Fullsizedcarlover Fullsizedcarlover on Aug 15, 2012

    The advertising literature of 1965 Chryslers said it best: The Most Beautiful Chrysler Ever Built." The cars are long, lean, and distinguished. The New Yorker grill of 1965 is most beautiful. The interior door handles on the New Yorker are clever. The speedometer design is elegant. The car moves quickly, with ease. I've owned two '65 New Yorkers in my life and my current one is an ice blue 4 door hardtop that I intend to keep for years to come. You can take your Caddys from '65, and the Lincolns, too. The Chryslers of '65 have the most distinguished, lean, and yet solid look by far.

  • Lou_BC I kinda like the blocky lines. The snout has a star wars stormtrooper look so that means it won't hit anything.
  • ToolGuy I respect the work this individual has done from the starting point he was handed ("I have been involved for about 6 months repairing this car acquired form my sister who received it from our dad"; "The car was an oily mess when I received it, had a clogged catalytic converter, and hesitated intermittently on the highway after extended driving (> 20 miles)")...But there is no need to show prospective customers the "before" or "in process" photographs. Very few customers want to see or know how the sausage is made.And rather than show extreme close-ups of the dents, call a PDR shop, and bump up your selling price.
  • Ajla "launched as the GX550 offering a 3.4-liter" I know some people rip on pick up or performance car buyers for insecurity but it is funny that premium vehicle buyers need inflated designations like this because "GX340t" won't get their d*cks hard. Although Lexus isn't alone in this, it's even better here because they went from GX470 to GX460 back in 2009 and no one died over the decrease. The IS500 and LC500 are still matched to their displacement but maybe they'd sell more if it was called LC650? 🤔
  • ToolGuy Q: Is it time for ToolGuy the non-early adopter to purchase an EV for long-term ownership?A: No, it is not.(Get this stuff ironed out and I'll be back later.)
  • Theflyersfan Why take the effort to cover the back plate when the front plate is visible in a couple shots?