Porsche-Volkswagen Merger Annoys… Norway?

Cammy Corrigan
by Cammy Corrigan

Since VW and Porsche started playing footsie, there have been enough twists and turns to fill TTAC’s pages with nothing but Deutsche drama. First there was Porsche’s audacious bid for Volkswagen’s. Then, there was Volkswagen’s fight back to take over Porsche. Now, the Norwegians are unhappy. Norges Bank Investment Management, the bank which manages the fund invests Norway’s huge oil revenues, fear that the takeover of Porsche by Herr Piech and his band of Merry Volkswageners will, as the NBIM said in a letter to the members of the board of Volkswagen, “leave the impression of being designed to suit the needs of the Porsche controlling families.” Avarice? In the Porsche families? What next?

The letter [via Bloomberg] continues: “unless the supervisory board takes steps to alleviate our concerns, we see little reason to support the execution of the proposed transactions.” Could there be a Norwegian spanner in Volkswagen’s German juggernaut? The letter goes on to stress “deep concerns” on NBIM’s part, that they are “not alone in this” and have been in contact with “big, international investors” without naming them. Bluffing? In the NBIM?

The NBIM doesn’t disclose its current holdings, but, to give an idea of the power the NBIM hold in this deal, owned $461 million worth of shares at the 2008, about 0.4 of VW’s common shares based on the value at the time. They also own 529 million Norwegian Kroner (about $93 million) worth of Porsche stock, too. Which means, for these Norwegian Vikings to stop this deal or (at the very least) stall this deal, they’ll have to start getting more people on their side. Highly unlikely. The German state of Lower Saxony (You know? Those guys who hold a blocking share in Volkswagen?) gave its blessing in August by signing the deal off. Stephen Pope, chief global market strategist for Cantor Fitzgerald in London, said in an interview. “It seems a bit late in the game to argue about the deal. The majority of investors want to get this over and done with.”.

Cammy Corrigan
Cammy Corrigan

More by Cammy Corrigan

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 10 comments
  • Montgomery burns Montgomery burns on Oct 10, 2009
    Autosavant : The Nobel Prize comes from Sweden. Just say'n. Edit: The prize is awarded in Oslo because at the time that Alfred Nobel set up the prize Norway and Sweden were joined in a union. Sorry to get OT.
  • Anonymous Anonymous on Oct 10, 2009

    "montgomery burns : October 10th, 2009 at 11:59 am Autosavant : The Nobel Prize comes from Sweden. Just say’n. Edit: The prize is awarded in Oslo because at the time that Alfred Nobel set up the prize Norway and Sweden were joined in a union. Sorry to get OT." my comment is the same whether the leftie haters-idiots on the peace prize committee were Swedes or Norwegians. But I did read that they were very lef wing types elected by the NORwegian parliament. I know some prizes are awarded in one and some in the other nation. I think Econs is awarded in Norway while the ceremony for the others is in Sweden. Even Obama's prize involves a ceremony in one capital and a dinner in the other.

  • TheEndlessEnigma I would mandate the elimination of all autonomous driving tech in automobiles. And specifically for GM....sorry....gm....I would mandate On Star be offered as an option only.Not quite the question you asked but.....you asked.
  • MaintenanceCosts There's not a lot of meat to this (or to an argument in the opposite direction) without some data comparing the respective frequency of "good" activations that prevent a collision and false alarms. The studies I see show between 25% and 40% reduction in rear-end crashes where AEB is installed, so we have one side of that equation, but there doesn't seem to be much if any data out there on the frequency of false activations, especially false activations that cause a collision.
  • Zerocred Automatic emergency braking scared the hell out of me. I was coming up on a line of stopped cars that the Jeep (Grand Cherokee) thought was too fast and it blared out an incredibly loud warbling sound while applying the brakes. I had the car under control and wasn’t in danger of hitting anything. It was one of those ‘wtf just happened’ moments.I like adaptive cruise control, the backup camera and the warning about approaching emergency vehicles. I’m ambivalent  about rear cross traffic alert and all the different tones if it thinks I’m too close to anything. I turned off lane keep assist, auto start-stop, emergency backup stop. The Jeep also has automatic parking (parallel and back in), which I’ve never used.
  • MaintenanceCosts Mandatory speed limiters.Flame away - I'm well aware this is the most unpopular opinion on the internet - but the overwhelming majority of the driving population has not proven itself even close to capable of managing unlimited vehicles, and it's time to start dealing with it.Three important mitigations have to be in place:(1) They give 10 mph grace on non-limited-access roads and 15-20 on limited-access roads. The goal is not exact compliance but stopping extreme speeding.(2) They work entirely locally, except for downloading speed limit data for large map segments (too large to identify with any precision where the driver is). Neither location nor speed data is ever uploaded.(3) They don't enforce on private property, only on public roadways. Race your track cars to your heart's content.
  • GIJOOOE Anyone who thinks that sleazbag used car dealers no longer exist in America has obviously never been in the military. Doesn’t matter what branch nor assigned duty station, just drive within a few miles of a military base and you’ll see more sleazbags selling used cars than you can imagine. So glad I never fell for their scams, but there are literally tens of thousands of soldiers/sailors/Marines/airmen who have been sold a pos car on a 25% interest rate.
Next