Ticketed LA Driver Guilty Until Proven Innocent

A recent news report in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, gives yet another example of a red light camera ticketing an innocent driver and then leaving it up to the accused motorist to prove the ticket was undeserved. Here’s a quick overview of what happened: Troy Carter, a driver with a Louisiana license plate, received a red light camera ticket in the mail from the city of Baton Rouge. The photo showed a Blue Mercury vehicle, which was completely different from the vehicle he owned—a white GMC Yukon XL. However, both his vehicle and the Mercury shared the same license plate number. The key was that Carter’s vehicle is registered in Louisiana with Louisiana plates while the Blue Mercury is registered in Texas and has a Texas license plate. The ticket should have gone to the owner of the Blue Mercury but instead Troy Carter ended up with completely undeserved ticket out of the blue.

On its website, the city assures residents that this kind of thing won’t happen with the ticket camera program because each ticket is “evaluated by sworn members of the Police Department to verify that a violation has occurred and to determine whether a notice of violation should be mailed to the registered owner of the vehicle.” After this kind of mistake, they’re going to have a tough time convincing anyone that their “evaluation process” isn’t just an officer with a rubber stamp. The story didn’t end there though.

Troy Carter wrote a letter to the city that included visual proof of their mistake. However, instead of apologizing, the city’s response was basically “show up in court or pay the ticket.” That’s when Carter turned to News 2, a local TV station.

A reporter went to District Court—which is where the ticket instructed Carter to go—to ask about the citation. The employees there told him that they couldn’t help him and that he should actually go talk to City Court. Employees at City Court explained that all they deal with is collecting payments for red light camera tickets and that they couldn’t help him either.

In the end, like Troy Carter, News 2 found it impossible to figure out who was actually accountable for the red light camera appeals system in Baton Rouge. The station eventually had to go to American Traffic Solutions (ATS), the ticket camera manufacturer, to get the citation dismissed for Mr. Carter.

So how do you fight an undeserved red light camera ticket in Baton Rouge? Unfortunately, the news station wasn’t able to get that answer for their viewers. For now, there’s only one way: embarrass the ticket camera company through the local media.

[courtesy The National Motorists Association]

National Motorists Association
National Motorists Association

More by National Motorists Association

Join the conversation
2 of 29 comments
  • Anonymous Anonymous on Sep 24, 2009

    [...] Red Light Camera: Guilty Until Proven Innocent By Richard Keyt, on September 24th, 2009 A red light camera in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, took a picture of a vehicle going through a red light. Baton Rouge [...]

  • Syxie Syxie on Oct 01, 2009

    How about this: The UK government is considering introducing legislation whereby motorists will be legally responsible for ANY accident involving a pedal-cyclist or pedestrian. That sounds like guilty unless proven innocent to me! There is no legal requirement on cyclists (and pedestrians) to hsve any kind of insurance, but either is well capable of being responsible for causing an accident with a car, another cycle, or a pedestrian. For a long time now, a motorist involved in such an accident has been responsible for paying an initial hospital A&E treatment charge for the injured cyclist/pedestrian, but this is NOT taken as an admission of guilt by the law or insurance. NOW, it seems that guilt is to become the legal RIGHT of every motorist - how stupid is this?!

  • ToolGuy Friendly reminder of two indisputable facts: A) Winners buy new vehicles (only losers buy used), and B) New vehicle buyers are geniuses (their vehicle choices prove it):
  • Groza George Stellantis live off the back of cheap V8 cars with old technology and suffers from lack of new product development. Now that regulations killed this market, they have to ditch the outdated overhead.They are not ready to face the tsunami of cheap Chinese EVs or ready to even go hybrid and will be left in the dust. I expect most of their US offerings to be made in Mexico in the future for good tariff protection and lower costs of labor instead of overpriced and inflexible union labor.
  • MaintenanceCosts This is delaying an oil change for my Highlander by a couple of weeks, as it prevented me from getting an appointment before a business trip out of town. Oh well, much worse things have happened.I also just got a dealership oil change for my BMW (thanks, loss-leader prepaid plans!) and this didn't seem to affect them at all.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Gonna need more EV fuel.
  • Lou_BC There's a company in BC that has kits for logging trucks and pickups. They have "turn key" logging trucks too. What they market is similar to what Ram wants to sell. The rig runs on batteries and a generator kicks in when depleted. On the West Coast logging in the mountains they found that the trucks run mostly on regen braking. The generator doesn't kick in much. Going up mountain, the truck is empty.