Goldman Hearts Geely

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

If there’s one thing that can be counted on in the world of investment, it’s that someone is bound to copy Warren Buffett’s latest move. The Oracle of Omaha has reportedly made a billion bucks in less than a year on his $230 mil investment in BYD, and that firm’s soaring stock price has other investors taking notice. Bloomberg reports that Goldman Sachs is looking at buying $250 mil worth of convertible bonds and warrants in Geely, in hopes of repeating Buffett’s success. With major global automakers (specifically GM, VW and Toyota) solidifying their dominance of the Chinese domestic market, Chinese automakers see the low-cost segments in other markets as their opportunity for growth, and Geely is no exception. The firm hopes to boost overseas sales to 66 percent of its annual sales by 2015, a goal that justifies its current pursuit of the Volvo brand (update from Thor Johnsen coming soon). Though a name-brand backer like Goldman could help Geely break into foreign markets, there are challenges aplenty for the planned investment.

Currently, Geely’s export business is only five percent of total sales. In the short term that exposes the firm to tough competition in China, where growing sales (+14 percent in the first five months of 2009) are being offset by falling profits (-9.9 percent in the same period). Sources confirm that Goldman’s investment will free up capital to ease along the Volvo deal, but a recognizable brand may not be enough to jump-start Chinese auto exports. The WSJ reports that Chinese exports have falling without interruption since August 2008, and are down 57 percent in the first seven months of 2009. Though Chinese government officials primarily blame the global financial crisis, they say “an apparent rise of protectionism” may have played a role.

Of course that’s not the whole story. Chinese analysts say Chinese firms “lack knowledge about overseas demand, government policies, regulations and certification.”Safety and quality concerns may have played a role as well. Indeed, Geely’s new EC718, the firm’s first global model, is still waiting on European market certification. Previous results like this one won’t speed the process up either. Meanwhile, Goldman has had several Chinese investments nixed by Chinese regulators in recent years.

Though analysts are saying things like “Goldman’s investment in Geely may repeat the impact that Buffett had on BYD,” it’s by no means a sure thing. If Geely had BYD’s secret battery technology or three-mode hybrid drive, the parallels would be more apt. Instead Geely is most famous for its knock-off Rolls Royce, complete with a single rear throne ( seriously!). Don’t jump onto your Ameritrade account just yet . . .

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 8 comments
  • ZekeToronto ZekeToronto on Sep 22, 2009

    Considering how quickly South Korea managed to replicate the Japanese manufacturing quality / reputation turnaround, I would not bet against the Chinese. They have excellent role models and more capital than those role models had with which to pull it off.

  • D002 D002 on Sep 23, 2009

    hey I like that car - Crassy !

  • MaintenanceCosts I wish more vehicles in our market would be at or under 70" wide. Narrowness makes everything easier in the city.
  • El scotto They should be supping with a very, very long spoon.
  • El scotto [list=1][*]Please make an EV that's not butt-ugly. Not Jaguar gorgeous but Buick handsome will do.[/*][*] For all the golf cart dudes: A Tesla S in Plaid mode will be the fastest ride you'll ever take.[/*][*]We have actual EV owners posting on here. Just calmly stated facts and real world experience. This always seems to bring out those who would argue math.[/*][/list=1]For some people an EV will never do, too far out in the country, taking trips where an EV will need recharged, etc. If you own a home and can charge overnight an EV makes perfect sense. You're refueling while you're sleeping.My condo association is allowing owners to install chargers. You have to pay all of the owners of the parking spaces the new electric service will cross. Suggested fee is 100$ and the one getting a charger pays all the legal and filing fees. I held out for a bottle of 30 year old single malt.Perhaps high end apartments will feature reserved parking spaces with chargers in the future. Until then non home owners are relying on public charge and one of my neighbors is in IT and he charges at work. It's call a perk.I don't see company owned delivery vehicles that are EV's. The USPS and the smiley boxes should be the 1st to do this. Nor are any of our mega car dealerships doing this and but of course advertising this fact.I think a great many of the EV haters haven't came to the self-actualization that no one really cares what you drive. I can respect and appreciate what you drive but if I was pushed to answer, no I really don't care what you drive. Before everyone goes into umbrage over my last sentence, I still like cars. Especially yours.I have heated tiles in my bathroom and my kitchen. The two places you're most likely to be barefoot. An EV may fall into to the one less thing to mess with for many people.Macallan for those who were wondering.
  • EBFlex The way things look in the next 5-10 years no. There are no breakthroughs in battery technology coming, the charging infrastructure is essentially nonexistent, and the price of entry is still way too high.As soon as an EV can meet the bar set by ICE in range, refueling times, and price it will take off.
  • Jalop1991 Way to bury the lead. "Toyota to offer two EVs in the states"!
Next