GM "Postpones" Decision on Selling Opel to the Russians

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

In other words, it ain’t gonna happen. If GM was going to sell Opel to the Canadian-fronted Russian consortium, they would have done it. Remember, the German elections are coming. The sale would have pleased the Russians, Germans and Canadians, but since they aren’t going to do it before September 27, it’s a clear indication that GM’s either going to sell Opel to Belgian-based private equity boys RHJ International or . . . raise some cash, pay off the Germans’ €1.5 billion “bridge loan,” put some more money in the brand’s empty coffers and keep Opel as the US outpost of a nationalized American automaker that provides a host of unloved automobile platforms to moribund GM badge engineers. Automotive News [sub] doesn’t quite make that analysis, but it’s close enough for government work. At least they see the downside . . .

Sources familiar with the negotiations have said that GM is considering raising $4 billion to keep control of Opel.

GM could contribute more than 1 billion euros of its own money to retain Opel, while governments in the U.K., Spain and Poland that are home to major manufacturing operations would finance another 1 billion.

GM could also raise money by selling or mortgaging the automaker’s assets in China, one source said. GM is no longer barred from using funding from the U.S. government to support its international operations, but taking this route could trigger a domestic political storm in the United States.

Ya think? Not to mention how Chancellor Merkel will feel if/when she’s reelected after GM failed to help her out by flogging Opel to the Ruskies. Could Merkel call the loan and throw Opel into bankruptcy, so that the Russians could pick up Opel for pennies on the dollar? She could. One way or another, payback’s a bitch.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 9 comments
  • PeteMoran PeteMoran on Sep 08, 2009

    The real reason GM is fighting all the way? All the valuable small car tech is vested within Opel, and anyone who grabs Opel will be an immediate small car competitor for GM in every market.

  • Npbheights Npbheights on Sep 08, 2009

    GM should have gotten serious about selling Opals in the US instead of blowing billions creating Saturn. They might have gotten a lot of people into a GM product without them really knowing it. It could have been marketed as an upsacale European import like an Audi or BMW, and it might have caught on a little better w/o all of the investment that Saturn took, although it would have taken a separate sales channel like Saturn, not an afterthought at a Buick dealership like in the '70's Would have negated any reason to buy SAAB too.

  • MaintenanceCosts I wish more vehicles in our market would be at or under 70" wide. Narrowness makes everything easier in the city.
  • El scotto They should be supping with a very, very long spoon.
  • El scotto [list=1][*]Please make an EV that's not butt-ugly. Not Jaguar gorgeous but Buick handsome will do.[/*][*] For all the golf cart dudes: A Tesla S in Plaid mode will be the fastest ride you'll ever take.[/*][*]We have actual EV owners posting on here. Just calmly stated facts and real world experience. This always seems to bring out those who would argue math.[/*][/list=1]For some people an EV will never do, too far out in the country, taking trips where an EV will need recharged, etc. If you own a home and can charge overnight an EV makes perfect sense. You're refueling while you're sleeping.My condo association is allowing owners to install chargers. You have to pay all of the owners of the parking spaces the new electric service will cross. Suggested fee is 100$ and the one getting a charger pays all the legal and filing fees. I held out for a bottle of 30 year old single malt.Perhaps high end apartments will feature reserved parking spaces with chargers in the future. Until then non home owners are relying on public charge and one of my neighbors is in IT and he charges at work. It's call a perk.I don't see company owned delivery vehicles that are EV's. The USPS and the smiley boxes should be the 1st to do this. Nor are any of our mega car dealerships doing this and but of course advertising this fact.I think a great many of the EV haters haven't came to the self-actualization that no one really cares what you drive. I can respect and appreciate what you drive but if I was pushed to answer, no I really don't care what you drive. Before everyone goes into umbrage over my last sentence, I still like cars. Especially yours.I have heated tiles in my bathroom and my kitchen. The two places you're most likely to be barefoot. An EV may fall into to the one less thing to mess with for many people.Macallan for those who were wondering.
  • EBFlex The way things look in the next 5-10 years no. There are no breakthroughs in battery technology coming, the charging infrastructure is essentially nonexistent, and the price of entry is still way too high.As soon as an EV can meet the bar set by ICE in range, refueling times, and price it will take off.
  • Jalop1991 Way to bury the lead. "Toyota to offer two EVs in the states"!
Next