UAW to TARP Oversight Panel: FOAD

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer
uaw to tarp oversight panel foad

The Congressional Oversight Panel, tasked with monitoring TARP expenditures, is holding hearings on the auto bailout. Even as you read, Wayne State University is home to serious CYA action. In the blue corner: the post-Rattner head of the twenty-four (now) member Presidential Task Force on Automobiles (PTFOA) Ron Bloom. Big Ron II is expected to hew even more closely to its previous proclivity for a passive/aggressive approach to GM’s non-management management. “Given the emergence of the new GM and the new Chrysler, the involvement of the Auto Task Force with the companies will now change,” Bloom told the panel [via Market Watch]. Once again, Ron proclaims that only “core governance issues including the selection of a company’s board of directors and major corporate events or transactions” will be subject to PTFOA meddling going forward. (After all, they’ve got Advertising Czar Bob Lutz to handle the little things like “crapping on advertising.”) But even though the White House is on hand to show how easy putting your best platitude forward can be, the UAW won’t be joining the testimonial fun.

The Congressional Oversight Panel isn’t happy about the non-development. “The UAW came before Congress and pleaded for billions of taxpayer assistance,” GOP member Rep. Jeb Hensarling tells the Detroit News. “Their ownership stakes in Chrysler and GM look suspicious at best and like sweetheart deals at worst. It’s outrageous they would benefit from the taxpayers’ money and then refuse to testify about it.”

Outrageous, yes. But not entirely unexpected. Hensarling said it himself . . . “Without [the UAW], the panel cannot provide meaningful oversight for $80 billion of taxpayer support rewarded to Chrysler and GM.”

Join the conversation
2 of 17 comments
  • WildBill WildBill on Jul 28, 2009

    Aqua makes a good point, don't screw your local economy because you are mad at Detroit (and DC!). If the dealer is giving you a good deal and/or good service, continue to work with them by throwing your parts/repair/body shop/used vehicle business their way. Stay away from the bad ones. Lobby your representatives to get the gov. out of the auto business and quit favoring the UAW (as if!).

  • GS650G GS650G on Jul 28, 2009

    Oversight? What? The UAW is entitled to all that money and more. Building cars is a sacred task that reflects national sovereignty and the American way. If it costs tens of billions to maintain the status quo then just shut up and pay it. You can thank the UAW later. I was actually considering an American made vehicle this year. Forget it. I'm going with their competition and driving another small nail into the box. Don't tell us to be patriotic and buy American, we already gave at the office.

  • Probert For around $15 you can have a professional check important safety areas - seems like a bargain. It pointed to a rear brake problem on my motorcycle. It has probably saved a lot of lives. But, like going to a dentist, no-one could say it is something they look forward to. (Well maybe a few - it takes all kinds...)
  • VoGhost ICE is so dangerous.
  • Akear Back as early as 2014 Ford was building some pretty decent vehicles. The Ford Fusion was getting good reviews and selling around 300,000 annually. The Mark MKZ was also the top selling US luxury car at the time in sales. My Ford Fusion is approaching the 200,000 mile mark, while current Fords blow gaskets at 40,000 miles.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh yes ; required with non-federal legal penalties for deliberate violation
  • 28-Cars-Later "Honda and Acura haven’t yet released an EV in the United States"Ok..."The 2024 ZDX rides on GM’s Ultium Platform and will feature Google built-in services. "Waht?