The CDO Magnate Behind New Saab

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

This morning, bankrupt automaker General Motors, their failed SAAB subsidiary, low-volume independent automaker Koenigsegg, and the Swedish government signed a deal for Saab’s future. Oh yeah, and some guy named Mark Bishop, an “American investor.” Who he? Can you say “junk bonds” and “sub-prime”? But before we look at Bishop’s CV, let’s break this deal down to its constituent parts . . .

Through his company Alpraaz, Christian von Koenigsegg will have a 42.6 percent stake in the newly reformed Saab. American investor Mark Bishop will hold a 22.2 percent share. Norwegian designer, industrial engineer and inventor Bård Eker will have 11.8 percent. The remaining 23.4 percent will be held by Koenigsegg Automotive AB, which again is co-owned by Eker and Koenigsegg, split equally.

OK, so, money man Mark Bishop was once a VP at Drexel Burnham Lambert—or so he says in every web res I found. Even if true, it tells you a lot about Bishop that he’s boasting about his time with the bankrupt Burnham boys, who pleaded no lo contendre moments before a grand jury was going to hand out a RICO indictment.

After that debacle, Bishop co-founded the now-defunct Brentwood Financial Group, “managing the bulk purchase, and subsequent pooling and sales of conforming and non-conforming residential mortgage loans on a national scale.” He then assumed the Presidency of IMPAC Mortgage Acceptance Corporation (more “non-conforming residential loans”). Bishop leveraged that experience to become President of sub-prime lender Novelle Financial Services.

Bishop’s now Managing Director of Liquiddium, a self-professed “leading private equity company that concentrates on “creative real estate transactions in select markets throughout the United States.” “Creative” as in specializing in real estate deals gone bad. “Creative” as in based in Malibu. “Creative” as in “properties are acquired on an all-cash basis as well as with the use of leverage.” At the same time, Bishop’s the MD and CEO of ABS Investment Group, selling residential mortgage-backed securities.

In short, the guy is up to his eyeballs in predatory lending and re-packaging of same. Now that CDOs (collateralized debt obligations) are a no go, Bishop’s moved on. However he insinuated himself into this deal (a story I’d dearly love to hear), Bishop’s goal is clear: strip and flip Saab using Swedish government money.

Bishop’s appearance on the post-C11 Saab scene is not a good sign for the brand. In fact, it could be a potential deal-breaker for the Swedish government, once this info gets out. Look for Bishop to get the old heave-ho. And not a moment too soon. In fact, what the hell were these guys thinking?

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 11 comments
  • Bill h. Bill h. on Jun 16, 2009

    "This reeks of sensationalism and rampant speculation." Well, "calling it as we see it" doesn't always preclude that. Good call.

  • CPTG CPTG on Jun 16, 2009

    For me, its personal. In 1992, I got hit walking in the cross walk by a Saab that blew the light. I broke my leg in several pieces and, although healed, I have been 'Saabing' quietly ever since. Saab, as a car company, is a bit of a joke. It's one factory (more like a fancy coach builder) that doesn't even produce its own engines/transmissions!!! What is more of a joke is investment companies running car companies---Cyberus has done a smash-up job running Chrysler (into the ground), why not ABS on a smaller scale?

  • Thomas Same here....but keep in mind that EVs are already much more efficient than ICE vehicles. They need to catch up in all the other areas you mentioned.
  • Analoggrotto It's great to see TTAC kicking up the best for their #1 corporate sponsor. Keep up the good work guys.
  • John66ny Title about self driving cars, linked podcast about headlight restoration. Some relationship?
  • Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could make in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well. Compact trucks are a great vehicle for those who want an open bed for hauling but what a smaller more affordable efficient practical vehicle.
  • Groza George I don’t care about GM’s anything. They have not had anything of interest or of reasonable quality in a generation and now solely stay on business to provide UAW retirement while they slowly move production to Mexico.
Next