Porsche Begs Germany's Dumbest Bank

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

When trying to buy VW with the proceeds of derivatives instead of plain old money, Porsche bit off too much it can chew. And they are choking. Volkswagen performed a Heimlich maneuver to the tune of a €700 million loan to save Porsche from extinction by bankruptcy. That loan is not enough, and it’s short term, 6 months max. Porsche was then able to secure a €10 billion bank loan, but had to put the crown jewels of the Porsche family in hock. The €10 billion loan was used to pay off a previous €10 billion loan. The adroit derivatives player turns more and more into someone who uses a credit card to pay off credit card debt. Porsche needs more money. They went to “Germany’s dumbest bank.”

Hat in hand, Porsche turned to the white knight of all auto manufacturers: The government. Would their KfW Bank please loan Porsche €1.75 billion? The Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau is a holdover from the post WW II times. It was the bank for the Marshall Plan. Don’t worry, no U.S. money is in the bank—80 percent of it belongs to the German government in Berlin, the remaining 20 percent is held by the German states. The German government guarantees all loans of the KfW.

“As a promotional bank under the ownership of the Federal Republic and the Länder (federal states), it offers support to encourage sustainable improvement in economic, social, ecological living and business conditions,” says the KfW on their website.

Support to encourage sustainable improvement is sorely needed at Porsche. They remembered that KfW had been dubbed “Germany’s dumbest bank” for handing over €350m to Lehman Brothers two hours before the American investment bank collapsed. While other banks withdrew money from Lehman’s as fast as they could, KfW overlooked an automatic transfer of government money.

But they aren’t that dumb anymore.

Porsche is “facing a strong headwind after having handed in their loan application,” Automobilwoche [sub] reports. “Lower Saxony and the Metal Workers Union think the request is inappropriate.” The strong headwind is caused by the usual suspects. Both Lower Saxony as well as the Metal Workers Union consider VW as their own playground. They are opposed to Porsche messing it up. Anything that slows Porsche down is fine by Lower Saxony and the unions.

Instead of money, they give unsolicited advice: “If Porsche has overextended themselves, then it’s appropriate to sell some shares instead of asking for loans,” said Lower Saxony’s premier Christian Wulff. Union boss Berthold Huber suggested, the Porsche and Piech families should ante up more from their private funds. Porsche is treating it as free advice is usually treated.

Not all is lost for Porsche. On Monday, the case may be deliberated by a committee. Or not. In any case, a decision should be reached by June 17th. On that day, the German version of the Ways and Means Committee will congregate, and Porsche is reported to be on the agenda. A hectic rescue operation as for Opel it will be not. “Porsche’s application comes as a host of German companies seek various forms of government help to overcome financial difficulties,” says the Financial Times. A company that not long ago bragged that they were swimming in money can’t hope for a lot of sympathy in an election year.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 8 comments
  • Geotpf Geotpf on Jun 05, 2009
    ZoomZoom : June 5th, 2009 at 10:12 am I’m happy to see a “Sign Guy” who can… 1. Spell. 2. Punctuate. (Yes, I zoomed in…) 3. Smile! He’s got it made, I think. "Hooker" should be plural, though, or preceded by an "A".
  • Rpn453 Rpn453 on Jun 06, 2009
    Geotpf : “Hooker” should be plural, though, or preceded by an “A”. But he doesn't want multiple hookers, or just any hooker. He wants a specific hooker; the only one he uses.
  • Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could be made in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well.
  • Groza George I don’t care about GM’s anything. They have not had anything of interest or of reasonable quality in a generation and now solely stay on business to provide UAW retirement while they slowly move production to Mexico.
  • Arthur Dailey We have a lease coming due in October and no intention of buying the vehicle when the lease is up.Trying to decide on a replacement vehicle our preferences are the Maverick, Subaru Forester and Mazda CX-5 or CX-30.Unfortunately both the Maverick and Subaru are thin on the ground. Would prefer a Maverick with the hybrid, but the wife has 2 'must haves' those being heated seats and blind spot monitoring. That requires a factory order on the Maverick bringing Canadian price in the mid $40k range, and a delivery time of TBD. For the Subaru it looks like we would have to go up 2 trim levels to get those and that also puts it into the mid $40k range.Therefore are contemplating take another 2 or 3 year lease. Hoping that vehicle supply and prices stabilize and purchasing a hybrid or electric when that lease expires. By then we will both be retired, so that vehicle could be a 'forever car'. And an increased 'carbon tax' just kicked in this week in most of Canada. Prices are currently $1.72 per litre. Which according to my rough calculations is approximately $5.00 per gallon in US currency.Any recommendations would be welcomed.
  • Eric Wait! They're moving? Mexico??!!
  • GrumpyOldMan All modern road vehicles have tachometers in RPM X 1000. I've often wondered if that is a nanny-state regulation to prevent drivers from confusing it with the speedometer. If so, the Ford retro gauges would appear to be illegal.
Next