Canada: Speed Camera Refunds Become Political Hot Potato

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper
canada speed camera refunds become political hot potato

Speed cameras have emerged as a top political issue in the province of Manitoba, Canada. The ruling New Democratic Party (NDP) is standing by its controversial decision last week against issuing refunds for motorists who were issued speed camera tickets in so-called highway work zones when no workers were present. In January, a court declared that such tickets violated the law ( view opinion), but the NDP maintains that payment of a ticket is an admission of guilt. The opposition parties are making the most of the situation.

“The NDP government has claimed to have a Justice Department which stands for fairness and justice, and yet that claim was shattered yesterday when the minister said he would be neither fair nor just to those who were caught unfairly by his cash-grabbing photo radar,” Liberal Party Leader Jon Gerrard said on Thursday.

The opposition pointed out that the province and city of Winnipeg generated massive amounts of revenue from construction zones. The number of tickets issued jumped from 3000 in 2007 to 60,000 in just twelve months. Manitoba Premier Gary Doer refused to order refunds, insisting the basis for the court ruling was “a technicality.”

“We side with the Winnipeg city police who argued that for safety reasons and for the proper deployment of police officers photo radar was a good tool for law enforcement in Manitoba,” Doer said.

During a parliamentary question period in the legislative assembly, opposition critics presented the cases of dozens of motorists who were unfairly ticketed.

“A woman with several children was given five tickets in the Bishop Grandin construction site — before even receiving the first ticket in the mail,” Progressive Conservative Party Leader Hugh McFadyen said. “In every case, 7:20 in the morning, no workers on site, traveling below the normal speed limit. Does [Mr. Doer] think it’s appropriate to hold on to this person’s money — when the judge has already said that it was wrong for this American company to ticket her in the first place — on behalf of this cash-strapped NDP government?”

Government officials, for the most part, ignored the jabs.

“The mighty Conservative Party can be the mighty pandering party all it wants,” Doer said.

Photo enforcement has proved to be a powerful electoral issue. In 2001, the Liberal Party in the province of British Columbia campaigned on a promise to ban speed cameras. On election day, voters threw out the ruling NDP party and gave Gordon Campbell’s party an astonishing 77 out of 79 seats in the legislature. The first act of Campbell’s new public safety minister was to outlaw photo radar on June 28, 2001.

Despite the political risk, a great deal of money is at stake with the refunds for the NDP government in Manitoba. A total of $43,994,765 CAD in construction zone ticket revenue remains uncollected.

“The NDP are sitting on more than $40 million of unpaid court-ordered fines, yet the people who received and paid photo radar tickets issued in construction zones while no workers were present are being told by the Minister of Justice they are out of luck,” Manitoba Progressive Conservative Justice Critic Kelvin Goertzen said in a statement.

“It’s almost a disincentive for Manitobans to pay their fines because under the NDP, if the law is challenged, the only way you get your money back is if you didn’t pay. Under the NDP’s backwards and unfair policy, it might get even harder to get people to pay their fines.”

Join the conversation
2 of 5 comments
  • Stef Stef on May 18, 2009

    If you ever get a chance to check out, let us know your thoughts. It's a mobile phone, Garmin, and TomTom application that alerts you to speed traps, live police, red light cameras, etc.

  • Kman Kman on May 19, 2009

    Here in Quebec, we're just embarking on this wagon. Today, May 19th, is the first day that 15 photo and red-light cameras begin operation. It is a "pilot-program" which has been propagandized so much as the answer to all road-safety issues, that one cannot say anthing non-positive without being cast as irresponsible, or not caring about safety. Do we, too, have to go through thousands of unfair tickets, court challenges, cases, frustrations, anger, suspended licences, increasing accident rates anyways before, some years down the road, these things get removed? What a silly way to run a society.

  • Lou_BC This offer reminds me of those plans where you get something free but if you fail to cancel prior to the expiry of the "Free" plan you end up on the hook for a lengthy contract. Tesla wants to attract people to their electrical company. It's smart. Make money selling the car, make money with subscription services on the car, and make money selling the fuel to power the car at home and at charging stations.
  • Kwik_Shift Fossil fuels making your electricity. Ironic.
  • SCE to AUX 1000 miles/month still works out to $30/month, similar to my cost in PA.The real effect of this gimmick is to show how cheap it is to operate an EV. But I guess even $30-ish/month for a year ends up saving maybe 1% off the effective price of the car.Other EV mfrs can't even build batteries yet, let alone think of clever ideas like this.
  • MRF 95 T-Bird In 1986 the Yugo was listed as $3990, which was the lowest priced car in America at the time. The base Hyundai Excel was listed at $1k more at $4995. I knew someone at the time who purchased a base Excel hatchback in red with a four speed. I think he added an aftermarket stereo. He was trading in a Renault Alliance that he purchased a few years earlier for about $5k.
  • SCE to AUX Good summary.I still think autonomous driving should be banned until some brave mfr claims Level 5 capability, and other distractions like games and videos should only be available for stationary vehicles.As for the A/C, I just turn a knob in my Hyundai EV.