Montana Votes to Ban Red Light Cameras

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper
montana votes to ban red light cameras

The Montana state Senate yesterday gave preliminary approval to House Bill 351: legislation that would ban the installation of red light cameras. The Senate voted 37 – 13 in support of the bill, which faces one more vote before the modified legislation heads back to the state House for consent. The state House originally approved a total ban on red light cameras by a 65-35 margin ( view bill). State Senator John Brueggeman (R-Polson) changed the House text to water down the bill with a special exemption for Bozeman, Darby and any other city that inks a contract with a private contractor to run a ticketing program in return for a cut of the profit before the legislation becomes law.

“I think [the ban] is a good idea because I am not a fan of red light cameras and I’m not a fan of photo enforcement of traffic laws,” Brueggeman said. “What this [amendment] would do is a sort of savings clause . . . It would say look, if you’ve put the infrastructure in already we’re not going to force you to take it out.”

Although Bozeman’s contractor, Australia’s Redflex Traffic Systems, has installed some cameras in the city, they are temporary installations that are easily removed. Lobbyists for Bozeman and Redflex pressured senators hard to keep their ability to ticket motorists for good, but twelve senators opposed Brueggeman’s amendment.

“I think this amendment is a kind of poison pill for this bill because . . . any city that wants to get around the law that we’ve proposed will go out and get a contract before the bill goes into effect,” state Senator John Esp (R-Big Timber) said. “What I think would be more fair is that any contract in place this day could be carried until the end of the contract but not renewed.”

The House sponsors of the bill made it known that they opposed the carve out for Bozeman. Unless the House agrees to accept the Senate version without changes, a conference committee will try to reach a compromise, perhaps along the lines of Esp’s suggestion. Such a compromise would become law once the bill is adopted by the House and Senate and signed by Governor Brian Schweitzer (D).

Alaska, Arkansas, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, Utah, West Virginia and Wisconsin banned automated citations either through judicial or legislative action. In other cases, the public has taken matters into its own hands. Cincinnati and Steubenville, Ohio recently voted to ban speed and red light cameras. Between 1991 and 1997, voters also turned out in Batavia, Illinois; Peoria, Arizona and Anchorage, Alaska to reject photo radar.

Join the conversation
 1 comment
  • Wsn Wsn on Apr 01, 2009

    Can we have a vote on a ban of bailouts on the local government level?

  • Lou_BC "15mpg EPA" The 2023 ZR2 Colorado is supposed to be 16 mpg
  • ToolGuy "The more aerodynamic, organic shape of the Mark VIII meant ride height was slightly lower than before at 53.6 inches, over 54.2” for the Mark VII."• I am not sure that ride height means what you think it means.Elaboration: There is some possible disagreement about what "ride height" refers to. Some say ground clearance, some say H point (without calling it that), some say something else. But none of those people would use a number of over 4 feet for a stock Mark anything.Then you go on to use it correctly ("A notable advancement in the Mark VIII’s suspension was programming to lower the ride height slightly at high speeds, which assisted fuel economy via improved aerodynamics.") so what do I know. Plus, I ended a sentence with a preposition. 🙂
  • ToolGuy The dealer knows best. 🙂
  • ToolGuy Cool.
  • ToolGuy This truck is the perfect size, and the fuel economy is very impressive.-This post sponsored by ExxonMobil