Ohio House Votes to Implement Highway Photo Radar
A deeply divided Ohio House of Representatives on Thursday passed sweeping legislation that would impose new penalties on motorist s, including a statewide speed camera program. State Representative Peter S. Ujvagi (D-Toledo) inserted the controversial proposals into a “must pass” $7.6B transportation funding measure to avoid individual discussion of the merits of the many programs rolled into the 361-page bill. Only one Republican voted in favor of Ujvagi’s plan, which passed by a margin of 53-45.
The program allows the state to lower the speed limit in “construction zones” on freeways so long as there is one designated worker present. A private, for-profit company will station speed camera vehicles in these zones to photograph motorists and generate a $250 ticket—plus an unspecified fee—mailed up to ninety days after the alleged offense took place.
The recipient of this ticket will be presumed guilty unless he can prove to the Department of Public Safety in a “nonjudicial, administrative hearing” that he is innocent using evidence that the agency considers “reliable and credible.” From each ticket, the state will pay $125 to the city or county in whose jurisdiction the alleged offense took place. Another $12.50 will go to a state trauma fund. The remainder will be split between the state and the private vendor in charge of ticketing. Anyone failing to pay the fee will have his license suspended, or, in the case of out-of-state drivers, be banned from operating a motor vehicle in Ohio.
The state of Illinois was the first to deploy photo radar on freeways in May 2006 with the claim that the program would save the lives of highway workers. A number of studies suggest that only 15 percent of freeway construction zone injuries are caused by automobiles. A far greater number of workers are injured by their own construction equipment.
More by The Newspaper
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Todd Reasland "For the SV, the FWD starts at $23,680 and AWD adds $25,330. " Yikes...25K more to get AWD? :)
- 1995 SC I think it's different now and the manufacturers just sort of leak them to the desired automotive "influencers" but it is still interesting with some cars. The C8 was a good example because it was such a radical change.
- ECurmudgeon One wonders why they didn't just go with a fleet of RHD Ford Transits, but the answer is, of course, "money."
- RHD Part XXXIV.Talk about whipping a dead horse!
- 1995 SC First gen Ranger is the best Ranger
Comments
Join the conversation
@HGONZ: Nobody in Ohio voted for photo radar. They (and I mean they) voted for "change". Photo radar is coming in on Obama's coattails.
I lived in Ohio, and still believe that there is no reason to live, or go, there.