Tesla Confirms DOE Loan Approval. Possibly.

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

It can be so hard to tell when the firm’s CEO is so notoriously at odds with reality. So let’s just say that we’re entering Elon Musk’s world, grains of salt available upon request. In fact, the news comes from a Musk email that Jason Calcanis has posted verbatim to his blog (cross posted at Tesla Motors). The main point of the email seems to be to convince the reader that Tesla isn’t about to disappear with the credit market, citing a deal with Daimler to electrify the Smart, a $40m investment round and the near sellout of all 2009 Roadsters. Even better, if you lay out $100k for a Roadster now, you might just have a new cashflow opportunity to get you through the hard times. “Due to our order backlog, it seems that owning a Roadster can be a good investment,” writes Musk. “Last September, as the financial and real estate markets began crashing, a Roadster was sold at the Sonoma Paradiso in California wine country for $160,000, well above the current list price of $109,000.” And if you buy that, I’ve got some mortgage-backed structured invesment vehicles that you might be interested in. But the big news is that Tesla may or may not get funding from the biggest sucker of them all: the US Federal Government. Or not. (Hat Tip: minion444)

“I am excited to report that the Department of Energy informed Tesla last week that they may disburse funds from our $350M Model S loan application within four to five months,” writes Musk. May? Might? Could? Sorry Elon, but I like a little more specificity out of my conjugations. “The Obama administration has thankfully made it a top priority to move quickly on the Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing loan program, as this will both generate high quality jobs in the near term and lay the groundwork for a better environment in the future. ” And again, nothing specific to Tesla there. I smell some trademark “reality issues.” Especially because there isn’t a peep yet from the DOE. Which begs the question: if Musk is fudging his verbs to imply loans are forthcoming when it’s no sure thing, how on earth is anyone supposed to believe his repeated insistence that Tesla is not in financial trouble?

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 14 comments
  • David Dennis David Dennis on Feb 14, 2009

    It's not confirmed yet, but I'm going to go out on a limb and say Tesla will, in fact, get the money. Why? See the WSJ about the DOE's stimulus problem in general: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123448815417580333.html?mod=WSJ_TimesEMEA It seems obvious that they are desperate for good proposals at this point, and under enormous pressure to show immediate progress. Supporting Tesla is "shovel ready" - the plant's already planned and vetting of the application is already well underway. With Tesla's ambitious (to say the least) schedule it seems clear that the money will be spent quickly. Furthermore, Tesla has a lot of customers who really love their products. The Stimulus bill was a dreadful mess, and I am no defender of it. But if you want to throw money away, handing it to Tesla seems like one of the more interesting things you could do. The money will hit the economy much faster than any infrastructure proposal and being non-union it will create more jobs per dollar. Furthermore, it would go to a company that at least makes a unique, innovative product beloved by its (admittedly few) customers. There are a lot of things in that Stimulus, many for far more money than this support of Tesla, that are far more probematical and dangerous. I just hope Elon Musk shows himself to be a leader capable of pulling off the new factory and car design. Even with the loan, it's still all being done on a shoestring. The $500-odd million is maybe $5 per taxpayer and I give my share of that ungrudgingly. It's worth that in entertainment value alone. Will Tesla make it? Will WhiteStar be boom or bust? We're about to find out, and it should be a wild ride. D

  • Tankd0g Tankd0g on Feb 14, 2009

    Good lord. LET BAD COMPANIES DIE. Why is this so hard for Americans to do? They are still delivering PROTOTYPES to people for christ sake. This is not how you run a car company.

  • MaintenanceCosts Poorly packaged, oddly proportioned small CUV with an unrefined hybrid powertrain and a luxury-market price? Who wouldn't want it?
  • MaintenanceCosts Who knows whether it rides or handles acceptably or whether it chews up a set of tires in 5000 miles, but we definitely know it has a "mature stance."Sounds like JUST the kind of previous owner you'd want…
  • 28-Cars-Later Nissan will be very fortunate to not be in the Japanese equivalent of Chapter 11 reorganization over the next 36 months, "getting rolling" is a luxury (also, I see what you did there).
  • MaintenanceCosts RAM! RAM! RAM! ...... the child in the crosswalk that you can't see over the hood of this factory-lifted beast.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Yes all the Older Land Cruiser’s and samurai’s have gone up here as well. I’ve taken both vehicle ps on some pretty rough roads exploring old mine shafts etc. I bought mine right before I deployed back in 08 and got it for $4000 and also bought another that is non running for parts, got a complete engine, drive train. The mice love it unfortunately.
Next