Gran Torino: Dan Neil Nails It

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

There’s a reason why the Pulitzer Prize committee gave Dan Neil kudos, and it ain’t ’cause his hair stylist saw Eraserhead a few times too many. The LA Times carmudgeon’s eco-friendly posture can be a bit of a bore. And there are times when Neil geeks out but good. But there are columns where Neil drops it like he’s hot. His commentary on the symbolism of the 1972 Gran Turino in the movie Gran Torino is a prose poem that will, Samuel Johnson-like, stand the test of time (unlike the POS upon which the column and movie are based). “1972 was in many ways an inflection point for the U.S. automakers, the year that Detroit’s mighty cylinders began to seize. The Big Three would never again be as comfortable, and arrogant, and solipsistic, as they were then. The following year’s OPEC oil embargo sent them reeling. It was this generation of cars, which almost seemed to radiate contempt for their buyers, that drove Americans into the embrace of Japanese automakers when they came. It was this generation of carmakers, and indeed the one that came after, that failed to answer the challenges of an increasingly competitive global market. That failure took Detroit — a once-beautiful city of broad avenues and majestic public spaces — straight to hell.” Make the jump for Neil’s Talking Heads-style conclusion.

“So to say Walt Kowalski’s Gran Torino is a cinematic metaphor doesn’t really do it justice. The car — to whatever extent it is fractionally responsible for Detroit’s undoing — is an agent of the film’s action, a prime mover, an original sin. And Walt, a retired Ford autoworker, is an original sinner. One day in 1972 Walt is wrenching away on a Ford assembly line, stuffing a steering box into a shiny Gran Torino before going home to a comfortable middle-class home on a quiet street in Highland Park. Thirty-six years later, he raises the blinds of that same house to discover the world he knew is gone. The jobs have vanished, the factories closed, the prosperity replaced with desperation. How did he get here?”


Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 11 comments
  • Jack Baruth Jack Baruth on Dec 26, 2008

    What changed in this country? People didn't change. The law changed. More particularly, the laws regarding trade changed. By modern standards, Americans had a miserable standard of living in 1955... but virtually everything they touched had been made in the United States by Americans earning a living wage. The American family of 1965 may have only had one car, one television, and a limited number of clothing and toys, but those purchases stayed in the economy. The "economic boom" of the fiat-money era (small "F") was a direct result of currency valuation, and it was prolonged by China's understanding that they could build their manufacturing base by undercutting ours. Manufacturing jobs will return once the dollar doesn't buy anything overseas. That day is coming.

  • Tigeraid Tigeraid on Dec 29, 2008

    wtf, '72 Torinos were great. It started going downhill in '73.

  • 1995 SC I wish they'd give us a non turbo version of this motor in a more basic package. Inline Sixes in trucks = Good. Turbos that give me gobs of power that I don't need, extra complexity and swill fuel = Bad.What I need is an LV1 (4.3 LT based V6) in a Colorado.
  • 1995 SC I wish them the best. Based on the cluster that is Ford Motor Company at the moment and past efforts by others at this I am not optimistic. I wish they would focus on straigtening out the Myriad of issues with their core products first.
  • El Kevarino There are already cheap EV's available. They're called "used cars". You can get a lightly used Kia Niro EV, which is a perfectly functional hatchback with lots of features, 230mi of range, and real buttons for around $20k. It won't solve the charging infrastructure problem, but if you can charge at home or work it can get you from A to B with a very low cost per mile.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh haaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahaha
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh *Why would anyone buy this* when the 2025 RamCharger is right around the corner, *faster* with vastly *better mpg* and stupid amounts of torque using a proven engine layout and motivation drive in use since 1920.
Next