Editorial: The 2010 Ford Fusion – Why It's Good. But Only Good.

Justin Berkowitz
by Justin Berkowitz
editorial the 2010 ford fusion 8211 why its good but only good

At today’s LA Auto Show, Ford revealed its refreshed Fusion. In large part, the midsize sedan’s in synch with one of TTAC’s core philosophies: evolution before revolution. Manufacturers should continue to improve existing decent products rather than swing for the fences– especially when it’s the bottom of the seventh. That said, plenty of pistonheads reckon the Fusion isn’t a patch (or is) on the Euro-Mondeo. In Fantasyland, that’s the Blue Oval mid-sizer on dealer lots. And if there’s still a Ford America in 2013, we’ll have our Mondeo and drive it too. In the meantime, good is good enough. Or is it?

The Fusion we’ve got now is a decent car. It’s not perfect. The turning circle is poor. The quality of interior plastics ranges from impressive to horrendous, especially in the cheaper models. The existing engines trail Japanese competitors a bit in horsepower and fuel economy. The back seat is missing headrests. Little things, that add up to a car that wasn’t totally there.

So what has Ford done here? They redid most of the dashboard, installing a better center stack of controls and display. It’s still not an Audi, and you’d be hard pressed to call it inspired design. From the photos, it looks like a significant improvement. Cost? Probably fairly low. Ford’s also dishing-up some low-cost, high profit options for the interior. SYNC is the best audio and/or nav interface on the market, in terms of ease of use, and a Sony-branded stereo means added profits merely because Ford is using a system from an established name brand.

As for the engine upgrades, well, much respect. The 2.3-liter 4-cylinder is bounced for a 2.5-liter 4, and it’ll still offer a manual transmission– now up to six gears. The automatic is also a six-speed. Incremental improvements; way to go, Ford.

Ford’s PR sheets claim mileage will be up a few MPGs, but honestly, even if it’s better than the Camry’s, that’s not Ford’s image. The 3.0-liter 6 is up to 240 horsepower, which is less than the V6 engines from Honda and Toyota, but so what? It’s a great amount of power for the Fusion and for a front wheel-drive vehicle. The top engine– only offered in the Fusion Sport– is Ford’s 3.5-liter V6. It has the more class-competitive horsepower rating of 263. I’ve never warmed up to this engine in the Edge, Flex, and Taurus; perhaps it’s the transmission tuning, but it always feels lazy and dumpy.

The Fusion hybrid is a separate debate– and the topic of Robert’s other post– but hey, at least Ford is in the game.

The biggest issue for these cars, aside from some moderate flaws, is that Ford has zero image right now. Other than seeing one on the street and saying “I like the look of that,” I don’t know why someone would be attracted to the Fusion instead of the dozen other competitors.

Ford’s marketing to journalists tends to argue that they have the best “thought out” vehicles. This usually means creature comforts, as well as some ergonomic improvements. For instance: SYNC, capless fuel fillers (cleaner hands), clever doors on the Flex (cleaner pant legs), power moving pedals (saves from short people sitting on top of the airbag). But so what? Can you really sell cars on nebulously defined “technology?” Well, no. That’s what Acura has been trying to do for years, and it doesn’t work for them.

Ford probably doesn’t have the money or resources to develop a clear brand image. So they’ll do what Toyota does: incrementally improve cars that are pretty good. It’s a good long-term strategy, but not a great one. And tough to do when you’re playing against the clock. We’ll bring you a review of the upgraded Fusion as soon as possible.

Join the conversation
2 of 37 comments
  • Njnikusha Njnikusha on Nov 20, 2008

    davey49 Yes :) so does mercury milan. what do u know it turns out Ford still is able to make good cars

  • Jerry weber Jerry weber on Nov 21, 2008

    Isn't it funny, we are praising this new Ford jsut one year after GM got accolades for their new malibu. It seems these halo models go so far in their help for their parent companies, but don't hit the home run out of the park. It is a shame, because I read how Ford took a mediocre 500 and made the new taurus a much nicer car. In the Fifties and Sixties, VW made a science out of incremental improvements on the bug. They sold these improvements as substitutes for a new model every year (or ten). Can Ford, improve it's way out of the doldrums? I hope so.

  • RICK Once had 78 TOWN COUPE and wish I had never let it go! Ultimate OTT excessive luxury! Have since had RWD FLEETWOODS, RWD Fifth Avenues ,as well as 89 Lincoln Town Car Signature Series and current 2007 TOWN CAR Signature Limited! All great cars, but 77 through 79 was KING 🤴 of the road! So sad to see what is now considered a luxury vehicle 😢. Who wants to drive a glorified truck 🚚?
  • Kwik_Shift There are better cars to drop $80G on.
  • 28-Cars-Later Opulence!
  • Kwik_Shift If there is no 2WD Access Cab with 6 speed manual, then I'm not interested.
  • RedDevil Radio Garden is my go to for long trips.Thousands of radio stations all over the worldfor free as long as you have internet. Sure beats hunting for the one or two decent stations in most areas.