Chicago Balances Budget With Red Light Cameras, Parking Tickets, Parking Tax, Towing, Etc.

chicago balances budget with red light cameras parking tickets parking tax towing

Chicago, Illinois Mayor Richard M. Daley (D) is counting on a host of new fees and taxes on drivers to balance the city’s 2009 budget. To wit: a new contract took effect on Saturday authorizing private vendor Redflex to more than double the number of red light camera equipped intersections in Chicago to 290. The first phase of the program had already mailed 1.1 million tickets worth $110m using just 136 cameras, thanks to contract provisions that ensure a steady stream of revenue. “The Office of Emergency Management and Communications has developed and executed the industry’s most stringent performance metrics and key performance indicators,” the new contract states. “(These) include citation issuance minimum yields to equal 85 percent or greater and system uptime to equal 95 percent or greater… At a minimum, installed systems must maintain a minimum 85 percent prosecution rate.” So far, the prosecution rate has been 94 percent. Daley rewarded Redflex by approving a no-bid contract extension. Read it and weep…

The new no-bid contract increases the Australian company’s five-year share of the revenue from $13,449,000 to $32,109,090. Redflex also agreed to allow the city to keep an extra $1,016,400 each year from reduced maintenance charges and to use union labor from a number of subcontracting firms favored by Daley’s administration. Thanks in part to the new cameras, total revenue from all fines and tickets is expected to jump 16.6 percent to $293.5m. The remainder of the increase will come from encouraging meter maids to issue more parking tickets and seizing more automobiles.

“The majority of this increase is related to the expansion and enhancement of current enforcement programs,” the 2009 budget explained. “The 2009 budget also projects additional revenue from enhanced collection of fines related to vehicle impoundment.” Higher taxes on parking will boost transportation tax revenue to $161.6m. Combined with a vehicle registration sticker tax of $105.9m and parking lot fees of $5.9m, Chicago expects to earn $566.9m from drivers in 2009.

[ Click here for the full story from]

Join the conversation
2 of 34 comments
  • Landcrusher Landcrusher on Nov 05, 2008

    Richard D, You are correct sir, bigger more intrusive government is now coming at us from both parties. The good news for the republicans is that after yesterday, it will be the democrats that get blamed for it next.

  • Andrewzela Andrewzela on Nov 05, 2008

    It doesn't really surprise me - these are such money makers. I don't run red lights, but I got nabbed by making a legal right on red without fully stopping. I don't want anyone to run red lights, but I also don't want to fund the city coffers. My neighbor bought a GPS locator that tells you where all the cameras are located.

  • SCE to AUX I like it, but I don't know how people actually use dune buggies. Do you tow them to the dunes, then drive around? Or do you live close enough that the law winks as you scoot 10 miles on public roads to the beach?As for fast charging - I doubt that's necessary. I can't imagine bouncing around for hours on end, and then wanting a refill to keep doing that for a few more hours in the same day. Do people really run these all day?A Level 2 charger could probably refill the 40 kWh version in 6 hours if it was 80% empty.
  • Lou_BC This is a good application of EV tec. A play toy where range isn't an issue.
  • Roadscholar I just bought a Veloster N Auto for $500 under MSRP
  • JMII In 5 years these cars will be worth about the same as normal (non-Proto Spec) version of the car. My limited edition C7 (#380 out of 500) is worth maybe about $2k more then a similar spec C7 and this was a vehicle with a $75k price tag when new. The problem with these launch editions is they rarely contain anything more then different paint, interior trim, some bundled options and a few badges. Thus there are that "special" other then being new and limited, two things that will fade into history very quickly. As they saying goes a fool and his money are soon parted.
  • J. Stephen Tevis Hello Everyone! My name is Stephen Tevis and I am the General Manager at the dealership in question! The information that was sent via text was incorrect, the info got trickled down to our internet manager thru a couple of different people thus the info being wrong. Nevertheless, we are NOT marking 'our' Z up $50K!! It was a discussion that I personally had with a few other Nissan dealers and the $50K number came up in that conversation. We have never marked a car up that much and just wouldn't. We have been in business for almost 50 years and gouging our customers is not how we achieved longevity. The Z is an incredible car and we are looking for to seeing it as I'm sure you all are, there are only 11 coming to our region which includes over 230 dealers. We are proud of the heritage of the Z but not so proud that we will bend our morals to sell it. I hope that this clears up any confusion, I am always available to give accurate and timely information, Thank you for your time.Respectfully,J. Stephen TevisGeneral Manager