Bailout Watch 142: ALL NEW! World's Most Extreme Detroit Apologists

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago
bailout watch 142 all new world s most extreme detroit apologists

Tonight. On World’s Most Extreme Detroit Apologists… Move over Jerry Flint! Forbes’ ancient and once venerable scribe thinks GM CEO Rick Wagoner hasn’t raped stockholders by pocketing more than $100m in executive compensation. But The Detroit Free PressJustin Hyde and Brent Snavely are willing to go even further. While their most recent mega-apologia predicts the end of Wagoner’s misguided management, the writers are happy to give the floor to analysts who suggest that Wagoner’s done- and is still doing— a great job. “Erich Merkle, an analyst from Crowe Horwath LLP, said Wagoner inherited years of bad decisions from previous managers that have limited his options. ‘You almost need to put Roger Smith on the hot seat, and I know he’s dead,’ Merkle said of the CEO who led GM from 1981 to 1990. ‘They were setting the company up for disaster later down the road. The business model that was created and the way that the contracts were structured were such that they were just not economically viable.'” Mea culpa be damned. And you can be damned sure that Merkle isn’t the only one blind to Wagoner’s cataclysmic effect on GM’s business…

Hyde and Snavely point out that an anyone who bought $10k worth of GM stock in June 2000 — when Red Ink Rick was named president and CEO — would see their stake diminish to just $860. And yet, “GM’s decline has done little damage to Wagoner’s stature among industry executives because its Detroit rivals have done no better. ‘Rick is very highly respected, and he is a very good leader,’ said Neil DeKoker, president of the Original Equipment Supplies Association. ‘They are just facing challenges that are bigger than any one individual or group of individuals can handle.'”

So it is just a question of great landing too short runway. Aaron Bragman, automotive analyst for IHS Global Insight, say yes. “Ehe biggest criticism he hears of Wagoner is that while change has occurred, it hasn’t happened fast enough. ‘And actually, I have been fairly impressed with his turnaround plan,’ Bragman said. ‘They have gone from being largely a group of fiefdoms around the world to what seems to be a very well coordinated company.'”

R-E-S-P-E-C-T. Tell me what Rick means to thee. “‘I think he’s as respected as anybody in the industry. I think he’s earned that. He’s been managing in a very difficult period,’ said David Cole, chairman of the Center for Automotive Research in Ann Arbor. ‘You’ll see that he has led a very important transformation.'”

And that’s what happens when you got and look for… Detroit’s Most Extreme Apologists.

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 8 comments
  • Psarhjinian Psarhjinian on Nov 03, 2008
    There’s a reason he’s still there. A business-based reason. Don't assume that businesspeople are infallible.** Two of the most terrible sicknesses to infect a corporation are as follows: * Management, especially upper management, being unable to admit mistakes for fear that an admission of fallibility calls everything else they have or may do into question. * Front-line and lower-management's unwillingness to either a) call upper-management on it's failures or b) present real evidence that failure is happening at all. Many, many businesses fall victim to this, especially when management abstracts itself from the business. It doesn't matter if you're managed by engineers, accountants, lawyers or plumbers: lose track of the fundamentals, let the process become more important than the product and/or start worrying about fallibility instead of results and you're in a world of hurt shortly. Ironically, "smart" people are just as, if not more, susceptible to this. It's easy for, say, Joe Plumber to admit fallibility; it's much harder for, say, Rick Wagoner or George Fisher to do so. They should know better, heck, they do know better. They're the smartest guys in the room, the best and brightest, they can't be wrong. ** Two examples from GM's own board: George Fisher presided over Kodak's implosion at the start of the digital camera age by failing to track the way the industry was going; he's also notable for starting Motorola's fall from grace. Eckhard Pfeiffer effectively killed the successful, independent Compaq, weakening it through non-core acquisitions and making it a target for more focused companies like Dell. Any of this sound familiar?
  • Gus Gus on Nov 07, 2008

    David Cole, head of the Center for Automotive Research is a complete buffoon, far removed from reality and a total tool of the US auto industry. I'll laugh when, unlike GM, Ford and Chrysler "employees" who are paid to not work, he's on the unemployment line. It's apologists like him, on the industry's dole, who help keep us from a real solution for the industry, which is on death's door.

  • CEastwood Seven mil nitrile gloves from Harbor Freight for oil changes and such and the thicker heavy duty gripper gloves from Wally World for most everything else . Hell we used to use no gloves for any of that and when we did it was usually the white cloth gloves bought by the dozen or the gray striped cuff ones for heavy duty use . Old man rant over , but I laugh when I see these types of gloves in a bargain bin at Home Cheapo for 15 bucks a pair !
  • Not Previous Used Car of the Day entries that spent decades in the weeds would still be a better purchase than this car. The sucker who takes on this depreciated machine will learn the hard way that a cheap German car is actually a very expensive way to drive around.
  • Bullnuke Well, production cuts may be due to transport-to-market issues. The MV Fremantle Highway is in a Rotterdam shipyard undergoing repairs from the last shipment of VW products (along with BMW and others) and to adequately fireproof it. The word in the shipping community is that insurance necessary for ships moving EVs is under serious review.
  • Frank Wait until the gov't subsidies end, you aint seen nothing yet. Ive been "on the floor" when they pulled them for fuel efficient vehicles back during/after the recession and the sales of those cars stopped dead in their tracks
  • Vulpine The issue is really stupidly simple; both names can be taken the wrong way by those who enjoy abusing language. Implying a certain piece of anatomy is a sign of juvenile idiocy which is what triggered the original name-change. The problem was not caused by the company but rather by those who continuously ridiculed the original name for the purpose of VERY low-brow humor.
Next