2009 VW Jetta SportWagen SE Review
The previous gen Jetta was one of the few small station wagons available in the U.S. It garnered a dedicated following amongst those who needed extra space but didn’t have to prove anything to anyone by driving an SUV. When the bulbous fifth generation Jetta debuted, the wagon was missing– but promised. Three years later, it’s finally here. Was it worth the wait?
From the doors forward, the SportWagen looks like any other Jetta, with trapezoidal headlights and grille bisected by an oversized plastichrome bib. Aft of the doors the bulbous cargo compartment looks like it was designed at a different time in a different place for a different car. Over all, there is no over all. VW’s design team needs to put on its overalls and give this one some of the Tiguan’s coherence, post haste.
There’s a lot more to like on the inside, though narcoleptics need not apply. Like many a VeeDub, the dashboard doesn’t have any style per se, but everything’s exactly where you expect it to be. In black, the SportWagon’s interior is so dark that even troglodytes would bring a flashlight. Thank Gott for the now-obligatory aluminum strip bisecting the bleak haus. Things brighten-up when you turn on the lights. Then the instruments glow in the brightest violet this side of a rave, surrounded by the usual VAG orange controls. Thankfully, judicious use of the panel light dimmer can tone down the electroluminescent ecstasy.
¡Viva México! The SportWagon’s cabin’s is well-screwed together using first-class materials. The base S model comes with velour upholstery. The high-zoot SEL has gen-u-wine cowhide. The SE and TDI come only with butt-blistering V-Tex leatherette. Para la gracia de Dios, our tester didn’t come with the optional panoramic sunroof, which turns the interior into a solar oven.
Never mind the heat, feel the bustle. Not to go all quadralingual on you, but back end is the SportWagen’s raison d’être. Fold down the Jetta’s rear seat and it’ll hold 66.9 cubic feet of whatever you feel compelled to take with you. Even with the seat up, there’s 32.8 cubic feet for stuff. As a bonus, there’s a hidden compartment under the floor. Of course, it’s only about three inches deep, so if you’re thinking about using it to smuggle something across the border you’re limited to pizza pans and picture frames.
The SportWagon will haul a lot of stuff, but it won’t haul ass, at least in base or SE trim. Under the hood: VW’s what-the-hell-were-they-thinking 170hp 2.5-liter five-cylinder engine. It sounds coarse when you start it and never seems to smooth out. No matter where or how you drive it, it always feels like the engine’s straining to keep up. When really pushed, the SportWagen will labor to 60mph in 8.4 seconds, protesting all the way.
The smooth-shifting six-speed Tiptronic automatic tries to make up for the engine’s deficiencies, but there’s that silk purse into sow’s ear thing that no one seems to be able to accomplish. If you’re willing to dig deeper into your wallet for higher trim levels, there’s a 200hp turbo four or the torque-happy TDI. America’s penny-pinching wagonistas (are there any other kind?) will rejoice at the news that all engines are available with a third pedal.
It’s a shame the engine puts such a damper on the fun as the SportWagon’s chassis is more than willing to come out and play. With McPherson struts out front and a coil spring multilink setup bringing up the rear, the Jetta always feels composed and ready to rumble. The electrically-assisted power steering is light without feeling over-assisted and the brakes whoa things down quite quickly when requested (as I discovered in a panic stop situation).
The SportWagen SE is reasonably priced. The base car starts at just over $21k. Pile on the options and the price goes up faster than you can say Fahrvergnügen. The automatic transmission costs a cool $1500, while alloy wheels, premium audio and a cold weather package (just the thing for those chilly Atlanta September mornings) ran our tester’s sticker up to a tad over $24k. Add in the glass roof and nav system and you’re pushing $27k. At that price point you’re overlapping a number of tall wagon-type CUVs.
But very few of these offer the handling or even the cargo space of the SportWagen. But do the great chassis and gaping cargo make up for the mediocre engine, blah interior and the misshapen rear end? It all boils down to how emotionally involved you like to be with your cars. If you’re looking for a frugal workhorse, this is it. If you’re looking for one of those “driver’s wanted” deals, well, did you know you can put a cargo box on a GTI?
[Volkswagen provided the car, insurance and tank of gas for this review.]
Revolver1978 on Jan 28, 2009
I've had negative experiences with VW's in the past (a persnickety '02 Golf GLS TDI) but this is on my list. I'm looking for a snow-ready hatchback that can carry three dogs. The A3 is nice but the hatch area is too small. The A4 Avant is on the list (used of course - they depreciate fast) as are used 9-5 and 9-3 Sportcombi's. I would agree with Mr. Karesh, I think the back is attractive - it remins me quite a bit of the 9-5's rear.
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Johnster Not feelin' it. The traditional unreliability of turbo engines is a big turn-off, especially in a work truck that (I hope) you'd want to keep on the road for 200,000 miles or more without having major repairs.
- ToolGuy Car audio is way overpriced.
- Marty S The original Charger was a 2 door, as was the landmark 68 model. Its funny that some younger commenters are surprised that its not a four door. I never understood why modern Chargers have been four door sedans. I think the best looking Charger was the 68, absolutely perfect in its lines and proportions. This concept really emulates that and I think I think it looks great.
- Master Baiter The D-bag elites like Al Gore demanding that we all switch to EVs are the type of people who don't actually drive. They get chauffeured around in black Yukon Denalis. Tesla does have a good charging network--maybe someday they will produce a car that doesn't suck.
- MRF 95 T-Bird As a Challenger GT awd owner I lIke it’s heritage inspired styling a lot. There’s a lot of 66-67 as well as 68-70 Charger in there. It’s refreshing that it doesn’t look like a blob like Tesla, Volt/Bolt, Mach-e BMW I whatever etc. The fact that it’s a hatch makes it even better as a everyday driver thus eliminating the need for a CUV. If it’s well built and has a reliable track record I can see trading up to it in a few years.