2008 Kia Sorento EX Review

William C Montgomery
by William C Montgomery

Heavy frost blanketed Broken Bow Lake, Oklahoma, where my sons and I bade farewell to 2007. Thirty hearty souls braved the sub-freezing night for a fly fishing adventure. Predawn light revealed our trucks standing sentinel over the smoldering remains of the previous night’s campfires. Through my billowing breath, I examined ice crystals forming a thousand little shrines on the SUVs’ sheet metal. A thought occurred to me: everyone that made the journey to our pine needle-carpeted glade did so in a heavy-bodied American SUV or pickup. In that early morning chill I wondered, is the Kia Sorento ready to join the club?

The Sorento’s wildly inoffensive design remains unchanged since 2003 (and will do until 2010). Given the temper of the times, it’s no bad thing for an Old School solid rear axle trucklet to maintain relatively diminutive proportions and ape a cute ute (albeit one that doesn’t look like a badly packed linen suit). As an off-road appliance, the Sorento doesn’t put a foot wrong, from its handsome, functional lower-body cladding to its deeply generic jewelry.

Even with the EX' $2500 Luxury Package, the Korean cabin doesn’t hold a candle to its more modern competitors. On paper, the option group looks great: leather upholstery, upgraded audio, dual zone A/C, heated front seats and alloy wheels. In practice, the skins pulled tight over Sorento’s seats must be sourced from malnourished thin-skinned North Korean cows. The audio is what it should be and no more. And the rest doesn’t pass the “Hey Martha, get a load of this” test.

Furthermore, there’s no dressing-up the Kia’s drab, downmarket dash. Panels fit together as closely as Dan Aykroyd’s Norge refrigerator repairman character’s buttocks. The retractable rear cargo cover is fabricated from the same tacky and tenuous vinyl used for old white window shades. The Sorento’s Spartan layout works by bargain basement economy car standards, but this $30k Korean has moved up a league. How you gonna keep ‘em in the showroom once they’ve been to Toyondissan, or, for that matter, Detroit?

On the plus side, the Sorento’s seating positions are excellent and the head room’s adequate for occupants up to 6’3” tall. Rear knee room and bench seat bests the comfort of the similarly-sized ’08 Jeep Liberty.

Fortunately for the Sorento, backwoods fly fishermen care little for luxury–– as long as everything works as advertised and can be cleaned without much fuss. To service the “genuine truck” market to which the Sorento (by necessity) aspires, the Kia must reliably transport lifestylers and their gear to their favorite recreation areas. Excluding worrying reports of long-term mechanical reliability, this is where the Sorento shines.

The EX gets a free-breathing 3.8-liter DOHC 24-valve aluminum block six cylinder engine that revs with all the carefree abandon of a Honda. When your foot reaches into the revolutionary penthouse, the mill cranks out 262hp and 260 ft.-lbs. of torque. The Sorento’s five-speed automatic slushbox lacks the quick wit to satisfy anyone with leaden feet. Its virtue is its ability to delicately swap gears with nary a tremor. BUT– there’s enough twist to foil the rear wheel electronic traction control and induce massive oversteer (file under ‘Fun’).

Equally important, Kia found the middle ground (that eluded Jeep Liberty engineers) between harsh and uncontrollably soft rides. The Sorento manages a comfortable and refined ride without completely losing its composure during abrupt maneuvering. It leans predictably in corners but recovers with little rebound.

Kia claims the little mill is sufficient to tow 5000 lbs. While I highly doubt Sorento owners will attempt to pull trailers of that magnitude, it’s enough juice to easily motivate a full load of camping equipment, fishing tackle and humanity over highways and onto the roads less traveled.

Speaking of which, the Sorento is a REAL SUV in a relatively compact package. The Kia’s solid rear axle provides sufficient articulation for seriously uneven trails. The company claims 8.2” minimum ground clearance and rock friendly approach and departure angles (28.4 degrees / 25.8 degrees). This dog will hunt. Also archetypal: this pot bellied pig tips the scales at 4,277 lbs. and feasts on dead dino juice at the rate of 15/21 mpg.

And speaking of expensive, my 2008 Sorento EX 4×2 test rig rang-in at a healthy $28,395. Opt for 4×4, and KIA’s deeply generic SUV tops $30K. Never mind all the cute ute competition that rears their coiffed heads at that price point (CR-V, RAV-4, Escape, Equinox), but that amount of wedge can make you a Ford Explorer, which is, it must be said, a damn fine rig.

The Sorento EX is a competent driver with a zesty engine and off-road cred that’s seriously hampered by a budget car interior and over-ambitious pricing. The cheaper models– staring in the low 20's with a choice of a smaller engine and driven wheels options– make a LOT more sense. But the Sorento EX is not ready to play with the big boys.

William C Montgomery
William C Montgomery

More by William C Montgomery

Join the conversation
2 of 26 comments
  • Larry P2 Larry P2 on Jan 10, 2008

    Mr. Montgomery: Thank you for your gracious and thoughtful reply. I do agree that the Sorento would surpass a FWD if both were equipped with comparable snow tires. My point, however, is that SUVs are sold under the tacit myth that they are fine without snow tires. THey aren't. And yet most consumers pay a fortune in extra retail price and gasoline because they think they are getting a capable vehicle without modifications. When a more practical and efficient sedan or minivan with snow tires would be a far better all around and more sensible, albeit less ego-boosting alternative. In these days of looming Peak Oil, is it responsible to drive vehicles soley for their ego-boosting "image?" Those transfer cases and front differentials burn up a lot of gasoline considering that the vast majority of them are rarely, if ever used. Capability, I guess is a term of art. In the circles I run in, a Jeep Wrangler Rubicon is often derided as a barely marginal Store-bought-Barbie jeep. It is embarassing when I took mine out with some really skillful Jeepers with fine-tuned elderly CJ5s. They were in two-wheel drive most of the way, I got stuck three times with both lockers locked in. To even come close to acceptable in this crowd, a stock Rubie needs about $2,000 or so in modifications. The truth is, these modern SUVS, because of liability concerns, are firmly biased towards on-road safety, rather than off-road capability, including the Rubicon.

  • Denisk Denisk on Aug 01, 2011

    My 2 cents: I bought a used '05 SE, leather, fogs, low range gearing on a turn-switch (completely omissioned in the review, an option to drive in a 2X4 mode)... It was a bargain at low teens with 50K and the dealer threw in a major maint. service. This was several years ago, and I promptly sent it to my relatives in Russia, who had to pay the same amount in taxes to get it in (taxes there go high on anything above 2L 4 bangers). Long story short, it NEVER had any issues, so far: only maintenance type things, an occasional bulb or wiper. AC compressor went, they found a replacement at $300. Imagine Canada's winter, toss in occasional deep freezes (-37C they had last winter in Moscow?), very Manhattan-like roads potholes-wise, and sporadic dilluted gasoline. Summers are short but super hot! This Sorento runs like a clock, starts even in crazy low temps. No issues, knock on wood. My own impressions, prior to shipping it out: liked it, liked it. Drove it through freezing rain, snow blizzard in the States without an issue. SE's stereo (with in-dash cdx) is actually very good, very good, AUX in is there. Had no issues with the panel gaps, or the leather, like the original reviewer, but then again, I do not get to ride in Panameras too often. Compared nicely with my Land Rover Discovery II, felt much more nimble and quicker (Well, Disco 2 is a different animal, an ancient one). Highway noise is minimal, behavior is predictable, although, not car-like as in Q5. SIze wise, it most closely resembled an X5, bigger than Q5 by a good measure, except, to my own surprise, the X5 is a lot smaller from the inside than this Kia! The Kia's 6-banger felt a bit thirstier than I expected, but nothing like the less hoarsy V8 in my 10 year old Land Rover.

  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.