General Motors Death Watch 134: How Do I Do It? I'm in Debt up to My Eyeballs!

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

GM had an excellent May. Despite the title of this series, I’m not going to dwell on the fact that The General’s ten percent year-on-year sales increase is actually a rebound from a disastrous May ’06 (overall sales are still down 3.2 percent compared to the first five months of last year). And I won’t bother pointing out that the majority of GM’s one percent market share gain came out of Ford’s two percent market share loss. Or that GM’s “rising tide lifts all boats” progress pales in comparison with the sales tsunami that Toyota’s [still] riding deep into the American heartland. No I want to focus on debt.

GM is carrying a monumental amount of debt. Forbes pegs the stat at $445b, against a market capitalization of $17b. General Motors has so much debt that even their high-flying foreign divisions know it’s hammer time (“You can’t touch this”). Only a major recovery in the black hole known as GM’s North American market can hope to pay off the interest on the company’s loans– never mind reduce the principal, break even or, Heaven forfend, bank a surplus.

Less than fifty years ago, General Motors had no such burdens. It was one of the world’s largest multi-national, multi-industry conglomerates. The company was so big and so rich it spent all its energies extending and embellishing its status. GM had so much money swilling around its corporate coffers it made money loaning its money to other people.

Those days are long gone. While auto industry pundits focus on the fading fortunes of GM the carmaker, it’s important to remember that virtually all of GM’s ancillary businesses– from refrigerators to airplanes to defense research to locomotives– have been de-acquisitioned. More recently, GM's been jetisoning bits of its core business, from shares in foreign automakers to the entirety of their [now bankrupt] parts provider Delphi.

The full list of items included in GM’s epic family silver sale is too long to provide here. Suffice it to say, in the 15 months to January 2007 alone, GM shed $17b worth of assets. Last month, the corporation hocked their remaining 49 percent share of their GMAC financial unit for $4.1b. Allison Transmissions is next to go. Aside from a few under-the-radar bits and bobs, there’s literally nothing left to sell. (Would YOU buy Saab?)

So it’s on to the plastic! Last Wednesday, GM replaced $1.1b in convertible securities with new unsecured convertible notes. As we reported previously, GM plants and machinery have also been “monetized.” Not to put too fine a point on it, the quintessential American automaker has reacted to the violent contraction in its Empire by going into eyeball level debt. Their dynastic dreams are history (literally). Servicing the debt is Job One.

In the last decade, only two profit engines have been able to perform that life-sustaining task: North American truck sales and GMAC. Now that GM’s pawned its remaining piece of GMAC, the golden goose is dead. High margin pickup trucks and SUVs are the last great hope for bailing out the artist once known as the world’s largest automaker.

While GM's PR machine trumpeted May’s rise in full-sized truck sales, America’s once profitable pickup truck and SUV market continues to contract. Last month, for the first time since 2002, U.S. dealers sold more cars than trucks. Cars accounted for 51.4 percent of all new vehicle deliveries. Aside from the $5k+ incentives GM’s piling on its slow-selling vehicles to staunch the truck-shaped wound, here’s the really scary bit: transplants scarfed-up 61.4 percent of last month’s 804,196 car sales.

Strangely, the Dallas News reports that GM is planning to increase production of the Chevrolet Tahoe, GMC Yukon and Cadillac Escalade at their Arlington, Texas plant in August. Either GM’s planning a major new incentive campaign in July or they’re stockpiling product for a United Auto Workers’ strike. No matter; there’s little expectation that SUV sales can generate the gi-normous profits that management squandered to get them into this mess.

On the face of it, everything’s going to be all right. GM will use the debt/cash to complete its turnaround plan, and then reduce its debt. But first it's got to placate (i.e. pay off) its former workers over at Delphi. And do something about (i.e. pay off) that union guy in Canada who’s watched too many episodes of Dallas ("I’m gonna bring Ricky down, if I have to destroy GM to do it!"). And fund their on-again, off-again, on-again, off-again, on-again range of rear wheel drive-cars. And, perhaps, pony-up a bil or so for the new “Beta” small car platform.

GM’s “We Heart Debt” strategy has topped-up their bank account to git ‘er done (even if it don't). But here’s the problem: they’re tapped out. If there’s a cash-related setback– be it a union strike, gas price spike or a big rise in interest rates– that’s it. Chapter 11. What are the odds?

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 54 comments
  • BostonTeaParty BostonTeaParty on Jun 08, 2007

    It shows you how retarded the UAW can be, there needs to be big changes with those monkeys. Why the masses don't look at their leadership and see the dangers they are leading them into and do something is beyond me.

  • Rtz Rtz on Jun 09, 2007

    I suggest take big risks. Put the Camaro into production next week. Select A123 batteries and start building the Volt now. GM can't wait till 2009+.

  • ChristianWimmer I have a 2018 Mercedes A250 with almost 80,000 km on the clock and a vintage ‘89 Mercedes 500SL R129 with almost 300,000 km.The A250 has had zero issues but the yearly servicing costs are typically expensive from this brand - as expected. Basic yearly service costs around 400 Euros whereas a more comprehensive servicing with new brake pads, spark plugs plus TÜV etc. is in the 1000+ Euro region.The 500SL servicing costs were expensive when it was serviced at a Benz dealer, but they won’t touch this classic anymore. I have it serviced by a mechanic from another Benz dealership who also owns an R129 300SL-24 and he’ll do basic maintenance on it for a mere 150 Euros. I only drive the 500SL about 2000 km a year so running costs are low although the fuel costs are insane here. The 500SL has had two previous owners with full service history. It’s been a reliable car according to the records. The roof folding mechanism needs so adjusting and oiling from time to time but that’s normal.
  • Theflyersfan I wonder how many people recalled these after watching EuroCrash. There's someone one street over that has a similar yellow one of these, and you can tell he loves that car. It was just a tough sell - too expensive, way too heavy, zero passenger space, limited cargo bed, but for a chunk of the population, looked awesome. This was always meant to be a one and done car. Hopefully some are still running 20 years from now so we have a "remember when?" moment with them.
  • Lorenzo A friend bought one of these new. Six months later he traded it in for a Chrysler PT Cruiser. He already had a 1998 Corvette, so I thought he just wanted more passenger space. It turned out someone broke into the SSR and stole $1500 of tools, without even breaking the lock. He figured nobody breaks into a PT Cruiser, but he had a custom trunk lock installed.
  • Jeff Not bad just oil changes and tire rotations. Most of the recalls on my Maverick have been fixed with programming. Did have to buy 1 new tire for my Maverick got a nail in the sidewall.
  • Carson D Some of my friends used to drive Tacomas. They bought them new about fifteen years ago, and they kept them for at least a decade. While it is true that they replaced their Tacomas with full-sized pickups that cost a fair amount of money, I don't think they'd have been Tacoma buyers in 2008 if a well-equipped 4x4 Tacoma cost the equivalent of $65K today. Call it a theory.
Next