Lotus and Alpine Scrap Joint All-Electric Sports Car Program

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

lotus and alpine scrap joint all electric sports car program

Despite Alpine and Lotus having previously indicated plans to jointly develop a successor to the A110 sports coupe, reports have emerged stating that all work on the project has stopped. With both companies vowing to go electric, the partnership was supposed to help both companies benefit from their performance expertise.


An announcement was made in 2021, explaining that the duo wanted to build a lightweight electric sports car together. It was later revealed that the resulting automobile would be the likely replacement for the A110. A possible twin could have similarly been slotted in as a spiritual successor for some of the smaller Lotus coupes that have gone missing in recent years.


But it’s not happening, with Lotus having confirmed that the joint development program has been scrapped.


“We have decided not to progress with the joint development of a sports car for Alpine. This is a mutual decision reached amicably,” Lotus told Automotive News Europe this week.


From Automotive News:


Bloomberg reported on Friday that Renault was considering using its own technology to develop future Alpine models rather than working with Lotus.
However, Lotus, which is majority owned by China’s Geely, hinted that the two companies could collaborate on other future models. “We have built a strong relationship between the two companies and will continue to discuss other opportunities,” Lotus said on Monday in its statement.
Renault and Geely are collaborating in other ventures, including a combustion-engine company called Horse and production of vehicles at Renault’s factory in Busan, South Korea.


The outlet noted that Alpine needs premium electric platforms on which to build larger SUV models aimed at global markets, including the United States, and Geely has some at its disposal. Lotus likewise has the all-electric Eletre SUV that represents new ground for the brand. It’s certainly not what one expects to see from a company that has historically specialized in lightweight screamers. But it’s difficult to make EVs exceptionally lithe and SUVs are what the market seems to prefer right now.


Lotus said it is still looking for partners to scale its premium electric platform used for the Eletre and an upcoming performance sedan. But it’s unclear how large of a role Alpine/Renault will play. The electrified Type 135 (the car that would have doubled as the successor to the Alpine A110) is reportedly still in development as a more-direct successor to the Elise and Exige. However, the French brand doesn’t appear to have a role in the project anymore.


Alpine is instead focusing on delivering a hardcore version of the Renault 5 small EV in the second half of 2024. It is supposed to be followed by a sporty compact SUV using a highly modified version of a Renault-Nissan platform presumed to be the CMF-EV.


The brand has also said it wanted to break into North America in the coming years, where smaller vehicles and low-range EVs tend to be less appreciated. Perhaps Alpine thought that putting resources behind a pint-sized electric coupe wouldn’t be the best way to spend its resources at this juncture.


[Image: FernandoV/Shutterstock]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Comments
Join the conversation
 7 comments
  • FreedMike FreedMike 3 days ago

    I think Lotus should go all in on the sub program. Wait, they already did...

  • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX 3 days ago

    Somebody came to their senses, thankfully.

    • See 2 previous
    • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX 2 days ago

      @Paul Alexander:

      What I mean is - Small, niche mfrs will destroy the product and the company by spending exorbitant resources on EVs. In this case, a sporty EV would have very short range, but a usable EV won't be sporty like its predecessors - something Lotus and Alpine have built their reputations on.

      Worse in the long run: low volumes mean a niche mfr can never achieve economies of scale with an EV. Heck, Lotus has historically flirted with insolvency just building regular ICEs.

  • ToolGuy CXXVIII comments?!?
  • ToolGuy I did truck things with my truck this past week, twenty-odd miles from home (farther than usual). Recall that the interior bed space of my (modified) truck is 98" x 74". On the ride home yesterday the bed carried a 20 foot extension ladder (10 feet long, flagged 14 inches past the rear bumper), two other ladders, a smallish air compressor, a largish shop vac, three large bins, some materials, some scrap, and a slew of tool cases/bags. It was pretty full, is what I'm saying.The range of the Cybertruck would have been just fine. Nothing I carried had any substantial weight to it, in truck terms. The frunk would have been extremely useful (lock the tool cases there, out of the way of the Bed Stuff, away from prying eyes and grasping fingers -- you say I can charge my cordless tools there? bonus). Stainless steel plus no paint is a plus.Apparently the Cybertruck bed will be 78" long (but over 96" with the tailgate folded down) and 60-65" wide. And then Tesla promises "100 cubic feet of exterior, lockable storage — including the under-bed, frunk and sail pillars." Underbed storage requires the bed to be clear of other stuff, but bottom line everything would have fit, especially when we consider the second row of seats (tools and some materials out of the weather).Some days I was hauling mostly air on one leg of the trip. There were several store runs involved, some for 8-foot stock. One day I bummed a ride in a Roush Mustang. Three separate times other drivers tried to run into my truck (stainless steel panels, yes please). The fuel savings would be large enough for me to notice and to care.TL;DR: This truck would work for me, as a truck. Sample size = 1.
  • Art Vandelay Dodge should bring this back. They could sell it as the classic classic classic model
  • Surferjoe Still have a 2013 RDX, naturally aspirated V6, just can't get behind a 4 banger turbo.Also gloriously absent, ESS, lane departure warnings, etc.
  • ToolGuy Is it a genuine Top Hand? Oh, I forgot, I don't care. 🙂
Next