Musk Picks Up the Axe Again, Cuts Sales Staff in Major U.S. Markets

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The torturous wait to learn if Tesla’s job cuts would come to their doorstep ended in April for dozens of members of the automaker’s sales team. As it embarks on a cost-saving plan, Tesla has let go numerous staff members and sought to close the bulk of its storefronts after moving the company’s buying process online. Last quarter’s grim deliveries report didn’t paint a rosy picture for the company, suggesting more cost-cutting to come.

According to Bloomberg, the axe fell in three U.S. cities last week.

The cuts came in Chicago, Brooklyn, and Tampa on Thursday, anonymous sources claim, with the pink-slipped staff made up of “inside sales” teams whose job was to reach out to potential customers and stimulate sales by offering test drives. Their role evolved after Tesla’s February sales model switcheroo, however. In the wake of the changes, these team members found themselves tasked with cleaning and delivering vehicles, as well as fielding inbound calls.

A now former employee told Bloomberg that the Tampa team (20 sales advisors, 2 managers) was terminated via conference call, effective immediately. A Brooklyn-based former employee recounted the same story.

While Tesla’s operations at these three locations will not cease, they won’t be as populous as before. The automaker still has customer service reps on the payroll. The sources claimed that inside sales teams remain in Tesla’s home base of Fremont, California, and Las Vegas.

Earlier this year, on the heels of a second consecutive profitable quarter (a first for the company), CEO Elon Musk stated his confidence in profitability going forward, with only the first quarter of 2019 in doubt. Almost immediately, the automaker began cutting its workforce while embarking on a campaign of seemingly endless price alterations. Many storefronts resisted closure due to lease terms.

Last month, Musk changed his prediction for Q1 2019 to a loss — an outlook backed up by last quarter’s reduced production numbers and a delivery drop of 31 percent compared to the previous quarter. Deliveries of pricey Model S and X vehicles sank to the lowest point in years.

[Image: Tesla]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 20 comments
  • Incautious Incautious on Apr 10, 2019

    soon there will only be the pot smoking CEO

  • Felix Hoenikker Felix Hoenikker on Apr 10, 2019

    I think there is a sizable market for BEVs for sub $25k sedans and mid size CUVs if the price is under $30k. Since the cost to build a BEV excluding the battery is lower than a comparable ICE vehicle due to lower parts count and assembly time, the battery pack is the sticking point. So when is the giga factory going to start cranking out lower cost battery packs?

    • HotPotato HotPotato on Apr 13, 2019

      The battery is the expensive part, so low cost = small battery = short range. I don't think Tesla will ever make a short-range EV. Their whole brand identity is as the EV that doesn't give you range anxiety. This is why they can't profitably meet their own $35k base price target, let alone $25k. Ironically I suspect the most effective way to get to those price targets without subsidies in the long term, is to have much bigger subsidies in the short term. You need economies of scale to bring the price down for buyers, but you can't get that volume without buyers in the first place. Chicken and egg. Norway shows that there is no mystery to creating demand.

  • MaintenanceCosts I wish more vehicles in our market would be at or under 70" wide. Narrowness makes everything easier in the city.
  • El scotto They should be supping with a very, very long spoon.
  • El scotto [list=1][*]Please make an EV that's not butt-ugly. Not Jaguar gorgeous but Buick handsome will do.[/*][*] For all the golf cart dudes: A Tesla S in Plaid mode will be the fastest ride you'll ever take.[/*][*]We have actual EV owners posting on here. Just calmly stated facts and real world experience. This always seems to bring out those who would argue math.[/*][/list=1]For some people an EV will never do, too far out in the country, taking trips where an EV will need recharged, etc. If you own a home and can charge overnight an EV makes perfect sense. You're refueling while you're sleeping.My condo association is allowing owners to install chargers. You have to pay all of the owners of the parking spaces the new electric service will cross. Suggested fee is 100$ and the one getting a charger pays all the legal and filing fees. I held out for a bottle of 30 year old single malt.Perhaps high end apartments will feature reserved parking spaces with chargers in the future. Until then non home owners are relying on public charge and one of my neighbors is in IT and he charges at work. It's call a perk.I don't see company owned delivery vehicles that are EV's. The USPS and the smiley boxes should be the 1st to do this. Nor are any of our mega car dealerships doing this and but of course advertising this fact.I think a great many of the EV haters haven't came to the self-actualization that no one really cares what you drive. I can respect and appreciate what you drive but if I was pushed to answer, no I really don't care what you drive. Before everyone goes into umbrage over my last sentence, I still like cars. Especially yours.I have heated tiles in my bathroom and my kitchen. The two places you're most likely to be barefoot. An EV may fall into to the one less thing to mess with for many people.Macallan for those who were wondering.
  • EBFlex The way things look in the next 5-10 years no. There are no breakthroughs in battery technology coming, the charging infrastructure is essentially nonexistent, and the price of entry is still way too high.As soon as an EV can meet the bar set by ICE in range, refueling times, and price it will take off.
  • Jalop1991 Way to bury the lead. "Toyota to offer two EVs in the states"!
Next