Unintended Consequences: Henrik Fisker Abandons Twitter After Musk Buys the Place

unintended consequences henrik fisker abandons twitter after musk buys the place

By now, save for only the least informed gearheads, almost everyone has heard Elon Musk has been successful, at least to this point, in his quest to buy Twitter. This development has caused no shortage of natterings in all corners of the internet, with tech blogs suddenly discovering the unpredictable and sometime unfathomable morass that is Musk’s social media presence. Auto journalists have been dealing with such issues for years.

One surprising result of the Twitter buyout? Henrik Fisker, boss of an EV company which ostensibly competes with Tesla, has packed up camp and disappeared.

Apparently, Fisker is taking umbrage to the fact his communications could be actively managed or controlled by a competitor. After posting one final tweet in which he told followers to look for him on Instagram for future content, the @henrikfisker account vanished and was replaced by a ‘this account doesn’t exist’ message. In short order, a post showed up on Fisker’s IG profile with the following caption:

I believe 100% in free speech. But I do not want my free speech to be actively managed or controlled by a competitor. And I do not want a competitor to determine how my followers experience Fisker as we grow our company.

Very good, then. It can be argued he has a point, since the platform is now wholly under the eye of a major competitor. Some are suggesting it the situation would be like General Motors managing the email server used by Ford Motor Company, while others are dismissing it as a publicity stunt and took the man to task on topics ranging from the relevance of his cars to accusations of paranoia. Somehow, the phrase ‘toxic masculinity’ showed up in the comments, proving that feature of Instagram is no better than it is on YouTube or Facebook.

If anyone cares, Fisker had about 86,600 followers on Twitter when he departed the scene. Musk? A cool 84.6 million. It is worth noting the official account for the Fisker company itself is still live as of this writing. Other EV makers, such as Rivian and Lucid, still maintain active accounts on the platform.

Henrik Fisker and Elon Musk have been dueling for years, ever since the former launched his first electric car company in 2007 and beat Tesla to market with the Karma sedan. Of course, the Karma was a hybrid and the Model S an all-electric – and we only need look at history to learn which venture was the victor in that little tiff. Fisker left the company he founded in 2013 and the place went under soon after. His new company is busying itself readying the Ocean, an all-electric crossover vehicle with an available 80kWh battery pack, a reported 40,000 reservations to its name, and a starting price of $37,499.

[Image: Fisker]

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 40 comments
  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Apr 28, 2022

    Since Tweeter is private company Musk can do whatever he likes with it and establish whatever rules he wants without asking your opinion.

  • Bachewy Bachewy on Apr 28, 2022

    Sigh, Musk hasn't bought it yet. There's even speculation he'll back out of the deal.

  • Master Baiter The D-bag elites like Al Gore demanding that we all switch to EVs are the type of people who don't actually drive. They get chauffeured around in black Yukon Denalis. Tesla does have a good charging network--maybe someday they will produce a car that doesn't suck.
  • MRF 95 T-Bird As a Challenger GT awd owner I lIke it’s heritage inspired styling a lot. There’s a lot of 66-67 as well as 68-70 Charger in there. It’s refreshing that it doesn’t look like a blob like Tesla, Volt/Bolt, Mach-e BMW I whatever etc. The fact that it’s a hatch makes it even better as a everyday driver thus eliminating the need for a CUV. If it’s well built and has a reliable track record I can see trading up to it in a few years.
  • Jbawden I thought sedans were dead? Coupes even more so. The core Charger/Challenger buyer is in it for the Hemi. To whom is this and the presumed EV Camaro marketed to? The ICE versions of these cars have a LOT of shortcomings, but rear drive, a V8, and a Tremec 6 speed made all that disappear. If you're forcing me into a 1,000hp appliance, then give me some visibility and practicality while your at it. And for the love of all things holy, please allow me to maintain a little dignity by leaving off the ridiculous space jam sound effects. What out of touch focus group think approved that? It's almost as embarrassing as the guy who signed off on the Pontiac Aztec.
  • Jalop1991 The simple fact is, America and Americans excel at building complex things (bridges, for example) but absolutely SUCK at maintaining them. We're too busy moving on to the next new shiny thing that a politician can get good airtime for. Fixing the bridge? Not sexy. Cutting the ribbon at a new EV charge site? Photo-op worthy. Demanding that the owner of said charging site be accountable and not let his site become the EV equivalent of a slum? Hard and not a newsworthy event.I have a PHEV and once tried some sort of public charging, just to see what happens. Failed miserably. We'd all be riding horses today if gas stations performed like EV charge stations do.
  • SCE to AUX Apps like PlugShare prove a few points:[list][*]Tesla's charging network is the best, almost always earning a 10/10.[/*][*]Dealer chargers are the worst, often blocked (ICE'd) or inaccessible behind a locked gate.[/*][*]Electrify America chargers aren't bad; my few experiences with them have been quite good. But they are also very new.[/*][*]Calling the help line is nearly useless.[/*][*]There are still charging gaps in high-travel flyover areas, which coincidentally have a lot of "Trump" flags waving in them.[/*][/list]As an EV driver and engineer, I don't understand how public chargers get so screwed up. They are simple devices. My home charger is 10 years old and has never missed a beat, but it only gets one cycle a day and lives indoors.
Next