Rare Rides Icons: The History of Imperial, More Than Just a Car (Part XVI)

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

We return to the Imperial story once more today, at a worst-ever moment. The year is 1974, and the future is bleak for the large prestige car. The economy is down, fuel prices are up due to a recent oil crisis, and the market’s trend is toward front-drive vehicles and sedans of a smaller size. What was Chrysler to do with its flagship Imperial in that sort of environment? Kill it off, that’s what.

We covered the new, more traditional styling of the fifth-generation Imperial in our last installment. For the first time in the brand’s history, the Imperial wore the same sheet metal as Chrysler’s lesser New Yorker. Unique styling on the Imperial included the front clip and the trunk lid. Underneath, the sameness continued. In previous versions of the Imperial, the flagship used a longer wheelbase and came with additional length, for “No Chrysler is this long!” marketing reasons.

That changed in 1974 when the Imperial shared the same 124-inch wheelbase as the New Yorker. Said wheelbase was three inches shorter than the 1973 Imperial. Exterior dimensions shrunk too, after the super long 235.3 inches of 1973, 1974 stretched just 231.1 inches. Width increased a hair, from 79.6 to 79.7 inches. Imperial was notably lower too: 54.7 inches over 56.2 inches in 1973.

With this new generation, Chrysler dusted off a historical name in Imperial’s portfolio: Crown. The brand’s top model was no longer the LeBaron hardtop sedan, but rather the pillared Crown Coupe. You may recall Crown was historically the model’s top trim, but was subordinated to LeBaron in the Sixties and disappeared after 1970. The Crown Coupe was a direct attempt by Chrysler to compete with PLC entries like the much more popular Cadillac Eldorado and Lincoln Continental Mark IV.

The pillared sedan was gone once again, as Chrysler played on-then-off with its lowest-priced Imperial. 1973’s body styles were three: The aforementioned two-door coupe, a hardtop two-door coupe, and a four-door hardtop. An interesting detail: The luxurious pillared coupe started out in life as a hardtop, and then was edited from a LeBaron into a Crown at ASC’s assembly line.

Although a new top trim returned, internally the Imperials were identified as 4Y (M), which meant all examples were of a “medium” trim. The coupe as flagship pricing strategy was a new approach for 1974, as the prior year the four-door was $228 ($1,504 adj.) more than the coupe. Even though trim differences were small, Imperial was a smaller vehicle than before, and it lacked the unique body of all prior Imperials, Chrysler raised the prices in 1974.

Every trim was between five and seven percent more expensive, in an economy that was down considerably. The bottom of the range was the LeBaron four-door, at $7,230 ($43,620 adj.), while the hardtop coupe was also a LeBaron trim, and asked $7,793 ($47,016 adj.). The top-spec Imperial Crown Coupe asked $7,856 ($47,396 adj.).

For comparison, the Cadillac Eldorado asked $7,656 ($46,190 adj.) at introduction, but GM jacked its price considerably, to $9,110 ($54,962 adj.) midway through the model year. Neither car could touch the most desirable Continental Mark IV, which asked $10,194 ($61,502 adj.) all year long. Though it wanted more money for the Imperial, Chrysler spent less than ever advertising its prestige brand. There were very few print advertisements, and this generation Imperial was not advertised on television.

Power train changes were naught with the new Imperial in 1974, as Chrysler stuck with its tried and true 440 Wedge V8 (7.2 liters). It was still paired to the same three-speed A727 TorqueFlite, too. By this time the Imperial’s engine was smaller than the competition, as the Mark used a 460 (7.5L) and Eldorado had a full fat 500 cubic inches (8.2L). Though engines stayed the same, there were some electronic differences in the new Imperial. A new starter lock system added protection from would-be thieves, and warning lights were now backed by LEDs instead of traditional bulbs.

With its new body shape and unique waterfall grille, the Imperial had a stylistic advantage over its competition, as they were not new in 1974. At the end of the year, Imperial sold 10,576 LeBaron four-doors, 3,793 LeBaron two-doors, and only 57 Crown Coupes. The brand’s 14,426 total sales were down from 16,729 the prior year but were enough to satisfy the brass at Chrysler. However, those numbers paled in comparison to the competition, where Cadillac sold 40,412 copies just of the Eldorado, and Lincoln sold 57,316 Mark IV coupes.

Chrysler gave Imperial one more shot in 1975 when slight changes turned the 4Y (M) into the 5Y (M). To denote the 1975 model, the front end received an altered waterfall grille that was a bit chunkier looking than before. The vertical slats were a bit thicker, and no longer grouped into sections. The bumper was revised, with two cutouts that functioned as an extension of the grille to aid with cooling.

Grille inserts resided behind the cutouts to make the look more cohesive. As a result of the extra space needed for the lower grilles, Imperial’s overall length grew slightly for its final year in 1975, up to 232.7 inches from 231.1. Fiberglass bumper fillers were extended to accommodate the grilles, and given a ribbed texture.

There were some technological advancements for Imperial’s last year, as spark plugs received platinum tips. The revised plugs were intended to offer a 50,000-mile service life. The battery was sturdier as well and was 500 amperes instead of 440. The government said a catalytic converter was required in 1975, so Chrysler complied across its lineup. The ’75 was a bit more fuel-efficient on unleaded, courtesy of a new rear axle ratio (2.71:1). Standard this year was Automatic Height Control, a load-leveling feature for the rear end of the car. For the first time (and later than the competition), the Imperial also used an electric rear defroster instead of a blower, which was an optional extra.

Another addition in 1975 was the Fuel Pacer System. From the driver’s viewpoint in the pillowed cabin, fender-mounted lamps would flash under two circumstances: When the turn signal was on, or when the driver was driving in such a way to cause poor efficiency. Imagine the fun of being nagged by the car’s warning lights each time a right foot got too deep into the carpet.

Even less emphasis was placed on Imperial advertisements in 1975, as the brand’s fate was already sealed. When the Imperial did appear in an odd magazine or two, it was alongside the Cordoba and the New Yorker. When Imperial appeared on its own, Chrysler often mentioned its other luxury cars in the ad’s text. It was a faux pas Chrysler had repeated for some time, as it failed to get dealers and the public to treat Imperial as a separate entity.

Though the ’75 Imperial was more efficient and had electric rear defrost, the economy was stomping on the large luxury car market. Add in the Imperial’s distant third place in the domestic luxury field, and the outcome of 1975 was not surprising: Chrysler managed just 8,830 Imperial sales in 1975. Not helping matters, prices in ’75 were notably higher than before, at $8,844 ($47,725 adj.) for the four-door Lebaron, $8,698 ($46,937 adj.) for the two-door Lebaron, and $9,277 ($50,061 adj.) for the ASC-made Crown Coupe.

The Crown Coupe had much better sales in its final year, as customers wrote checks for 1,641. There were 1,087 LeBaron two-doors sold and 6,102 sedans. Part of the sales slump was down to the discontinuation of the brand, which leaked in the third quarter of the year. The leak was prior to any planned announcement by Chrysler.

On June 11th, 1975 Chrysler invited auto journalists to Detroit to check out the 1976 Chrysler lineup. And there were no Imperials present. Journalists casually but accidentally told various persons about the Imperial’s death, and by the next day, it was published as a New York Times exclusive. The NYT cited that even in July, Imperial’s sales were already abysmal: 2,808 total, or 55 percent lower than the same time in 1974.

The final independent Imperial rolled off the line on June 12th, 1975, the very day the NYT piece was published. The last one ever made was a black-over-black hardtop sedan. It was a sad day, sort of: Chrysler had a plan in place for 1976. That year the rest of the C-bodies continued under their various Chrysler, Dodge, and Plymouth names, but there was an addition to the New Yorker lineup.

It was a new prestigious top trim: Brougham. The Brougham used the front and rear of the discontinued Imperial, and was essentially the same car. Differences included the replacement of Imperial badges with Chrysler ones and the removal of all Imperial eagle logos. There were a few standard Imperial features moved over to optional extras on the New Yorker Brougham, to made the base price more appealable.

New Yorker was about $2,000 ($10,113 adj.) less expensive than an equivalent and nearly identical Imperial from the year prior. The Brougham had an expensive option available in the $598 ($3,023 adj.) St. Regis package. Exclusive to the coupe, the St. Regis added a thick padded vinyl roof, and the ever-impressive and formal opera window. It was essentially what the Crown Coupe was a year prior.

The rest of the C-bodies continued on through 1978, as the Imperial name was erased from the memory of most everyone. But a few years later there was one man who fondly remembered Imperial, and thought it should return once more as an exclusive luxury car. The man’s name was Lee Iacocca, and he was the new CEO of Chrysler. More on that in our next installment.

[Images: Chrysler]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 38 comments
  • MitchConner MitchConner on Feb 18, 2022

    Funny how Chrysler offered that Dijon mustard yellowy brown crap color on virtually every product around that time. Throw in that discount dog kibble brown for the vinyl roof and interior and, voila, instant garbage.

    • See 3 previous
    • Jeff S Jeff S on Feb 18, 2022

      @Arthur Dailey I had a townhouse with avocado formica kitchen counters, green linoleum in the kitchen patterned like tile, green patterned wallpaper in the kitchen and thick gold shag carpet throughout the house (gold gold carpet not beige) built in 1975. Living with green and gold for that long was enough to cure me of those colors. I remember about 10 years ago shag carpet made a comeback although not as shagging as mine--once was enough. I also got tired of dark brown and tan vehicles. At least the toilets and bathtubs were white.

  • Nick Nick on Feb 22, 2022

    I must say I love the Imperials from 1964 all the way through 1975. I don't know what the prices are like now but up until a few years ago the prices were pretty reasonable. I was sorely tempted on several occasions. For better or worse, I didn't bite. But I still wish I had one for long, highway drives.

  • Rochester "better than Vinfast" is a pretty low bar.
  • TheMrFreeze That new Ferrari looks nice but other than that, nothing.And VW having to put an air-cooled Beetle in its display to try and make the ID.Buzz look cool makes this classic VW owner sad 😢
  • Wolfwagen Is it me or have auto shows just turned to meh? To me, there isn't much excitement anymore. it's like we have hit a second malaise era. Every new vehicle is some cookie-cutter CUV. No cutting-edge designs. No talk of any great powertrains, or technological achievements. It's sort of expected with the push to EVs but there is no news on that front either. No new battery tech, no new charging tech. Nothing.
  • CanadaCraig You can just imagine how quickly the tires are going to wear out on a 5,800 lbs AWD 2024 Dodge Charger.
  • Luke42 I tried FSD for a month in December 2022 on my Model Y and wasn’t impressed.The building-blocks were amazing but sum of the all of those amazing parts was about as useful as Honda Sensing in terms of reducing the driver’s workload.I have a list of fixes I need to see in Autopilot before I blow another $200 renting FSD. But I will try it for free for a month.I would love it if FSD v12 lived up to the hype and my mind were changed. But I have no reason to believe I might be wrong at this point, based on the reviews I’ve read so far. [shrug]. I’m sure I’ll have more to say about it once I get to test it.
Next