Polaris Introduces All-Electric Ranger, Signals Shift in Off-Road Market
I know – we rarely (if ever) cover powersports on this site, given our mission to bring you news about cars and shine lights on dusty corners of the automotive industry. However, the new Polaris Ranger XP Kinetic is worth your attention, simply for the change it is signaling in terms of electric vehicles.
The off-road market isn’t exactly the type of area in which one would expect an EV to thrive. After all, we generally thrash on the things in conditions which are not to be believed before poking them away for five days until the weekend rolls around again. Or, if you’re a company buying these things for work on a ranch or other type of property, they tend to be in use all day as employees hop from one job to another.
Which is why the introduction of this Ranger XP Kinetic is big news. Until now, the thought of an all-electric side-by-side was borderline preposterous, given the limited amount of range manufacturers were able to (affordably) pack into this type of machine. Driving distance of a golf cart is useless in most of the situations in which a Polaris Ranger finds itself – namely, hauling logs on the Back 40 or plowing snow from the ski club parking lot.
There will be a pair of trims when the 2023 Ranger Kinetic drops midway through the next calendar year. First up is a Premium trim which carries 14.9 kWh worth of batteries and is said to be good for a maximum range of about 45 miles. Stepping up to the Ultimate trim brings a few extra features, including the Ride Command 7-inch touchscreen infotainment system (yes, on a side-by-side), and doubles battery capacity to 29.8 kWh. This stretches total driving distance to roughly 80 miles, truthfully not that far off the road-going 2021 Mini Cooper S E (110 miles).
Power from the electric motor, which Polaris engineers told us is mounted in roughly the same location as the gasser’s engine, checks in at 110 horsepower. That’s a number on par with what’s expected in workhorse-grade UTVs (psychotic sports units like the Polaris RZR Pro R wield up to 225 horsepower). The big news is, as with most EVs, torque. Here, there is 140 lb-ft of the stuff, all of which is available the instant its pilot drops the hammer. Towing is rated at 2,500 lbs – more than some on-road crossovers – and payload is capped at 1,250 pounds. Toss in 14 inches of ground clearance and 10 inches of suspension travel and you’ve a machine whose specs compare well with its gasoline-powered brothers.
If you’re wondering, a comparable Polaris XP 1000 makes 82 horsepower from its 999 cc engine and has equal towing/payload ratings. This suggests limitations of its brakes and chassis (both the gasser and EV), not the powertrain. In a secret demonstration attended by this author back in August, we witnessed a prototype Ranger XP Kinetic tow a heavy-duty pickup truck and an attendant trailer. That type of usage is not recommended, of course, nor will it do the Kinetic’s range any favors. Point is – the capability is there thanks to a mountain of torque. We’ll also note an all-electric’s relatively silent operations, which will be a bonus for hunters and people working around livestock.
Here’s another consideration. The gas-powered XP 1000 has an 11.5-gallon fuel tank and gets about 12 mpg on a good day, less in the hands of your lead-footed scribe. This means I’ll get roughly 120 miles from a tank of fuel if I’m lucky, just 40 more than the XP Kinetic in Ultimate trim. As first efforts go, that’s not bad at all. Of course, I can take a can of gas with me and refill on the trail.
Polaris insists they’ve hurled their usual battery (pun intended) of tests at the XP Kinetic, ensuring a robust system that’ll endure the typical abuse hurled at these machines. With much lower operating and running costs, these things might just make sense for the fleet buyer seeking to replace those tired machines which have been in use on their property for ages. The ground clearance and off-road capability of any Ranger make them much more suitable for certain duties than a golf cart, and they are able to get into – and out of – places a cheap pickup truck or Jeep would not.
This brings us to the price. The least expensive Ranger XP Kinetic will set customers back $24,999, with the long-range Ultimate adding 5 large to that figure. Some landowners will find overall long-term value in these numbers. A comparable 3-seat Ranger XP 1000, if you’re wondering and we know you are, starts right about 20 grand.
We look forward to seeing how they do in the market. If successful, you can bet it won’t be the last EV to be born from the collab between Polaris and Zero Motorcycles.
Join the conversation
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- ToolGuy CXXVIII comments?!?
- ToolGuy I did truck things with my truck this past week, twenty-odd miles from home (farther than usual). Recall that the interior bed space of my (modified) truck is 98" x 74". On the ride home yesterday the bed carried a 20 foot extension ladder (10 feet long, flagged 14 inches past the rear bumper), two other ladders, a smallish air compressor, a largish shop vac, three large bins, some materials, some scrap, and a slew of tool cases/bags. It was pretty full, is what I'm saying.The range of the Cybertruck would have been just fine. Nothing I carried had any substantial weight to it, in truck terms. The frunk would have been extremely useful (lock the tool cases there, out of the way of the Bed Stuff, away from prying eyes and grasping fingers -- you say I can charge my cordless tools there? bonus). Stainless steel plus no paint is a plus.Apparently the Cybertruck bed will be 78" long (but over 96" with the tailgate folded down) and 60-65" wide. And then Tesla promises "100 cubic feet of exterior, lockable storage — including the under-bed, frunk and sail pillars." Underbed storage requires the bed to be clear of other stuff, but bottom line everything would have fit, especially when we consider the second row of seats (tools and some materials out of the weather).Some days I was hauling mostly air on one leg of the trip. There were several store runs involved, some for 8-foot stock. One day I bummed a ride in a Roush Mustang. Three separate times other drivers tried to run into my truck (stainless steel panels, yes please). The fuel savings would be large enough for me to notice and to care.TL;DR: This truck would work for me, as a truck. Sample size = 1.
- Art Vandelay Dodge should bring this back. They could sell it as the classic classic classic model
- Surferjoe Still have a 2013 RDX, naturally aspirated V6, just can't get behind a 4 banger turbo.Also gloriously absent, ESS, lane departure warnings, etc.
- ToolGuy Is it a genuine Top Hand? Oh, I forgot, I don't care. 🙂
This is laughably bad. Far more money and weight and it only has an 80 mile range? And after that you are stuck with an extremely long recharge time. All for MORE MONEY than an ICE model. The ICE model not only gets a longer range but can be refilled in 3 minutes to give you another 120 miles of range. This, much like full size EVs, as so severely compromised that you wonder if it is just a bad joke rather than something that a short sighted company is desperately attempting to make a business case for.
Is this thing going to burst into flames in the forest some day?