Rare Rides Icons: The History of Imperial, More Than Just a Car (Part I)

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis
rare rides icons the history of imperial more than just a car part i

Today Rare Rides Icons features a special Chrysler that was a car, then a brand, then a car again. Throughout its varied history, Imperial always represented the best of what Chrysler offered. First, we travel back to the Twenties.

Conceived as a full-size flagship luxury car, the Imperial was the idea of Chrysler founder Walter P. Chrysler. In the Roaring Twenties, well-heeled Americans were all about large domestic luxury cars. Hardly lacking in choice, big players in the segment included Cadillac, Cord, Lincoln, Packard, Pierce-Arrow, and Studebaker. Though the Imperial brand was all-new, such a naming scheme was not: Packard, Cadillac, and Buick all used Imperial in past as a name of their high-trim limousine offerings.

Chrysler was limited in its offerings as it was a brand new car company. Founded in 1925 with the remains of the Maxwell Motor Company, the new Chrysler had but one car: the Six. During its production, the Six had various body styles and engine displacements, all engines of an inline-six configuration. Chrysler knew the Six could reach only so high. Other makers offered eight, 12, or eventually 16 cylinders. Still, Mister Chrysler felt his company could make a very competitive luxury car with an inline-six. Customers didn’t have any preconceived notions about Chrysler, a brand new automaker.

The new luxury offering was deemed the Imperial, and entered production in 1926 as a development of the Chrysler Six. Intended for the most discerning buyer, the Imperial was offered with two or four doors and in a variety of body styles. Two-door Imperials were a coupe or roadster, while four-door examples could be ordered as a standard sedan, more formal phaeton, or a seven-passenger limousine. The early Imperial limousine asked a considerable $3,595, or just over $55,000 adjusted for inflation. In top Town Car trim the ask was $5,495 ($84,000 adj). Prices and offerings escalated quickly. By 1927 there were three different wheelbases available: 120-inch, 127-inch, or the ultra-long and luxurious 133-inch, a special-order. The following year, an even longer 136-inch wheelbase appeared and was called the Series 80L. Imperial offered its customers a catalog of coachbuilders, each of which created between four and six different Imperial bodies. Companies like LeBaron, Dietrich, Briggs, and Locke.

All first-gen Imperials were powered by a slightly enlarged version of Chrysler’s inline-six. The engine’s first development was 288.6 cubic inches (4.7L) but was later enlarged to 309.3 cubic inches (5.1L). Additional displacement was key to luxury motoring at the time, as the quality of gasoline available was quite low. Standard gasoline in the Twenties was estimated at 40 to 60 octane, with the best quality fuels at 50 to 65. Given the low-quality juice, Imperial’s initial 4.7 managed 92 horsepower – plenty. Those horses were delivered through a three-speed manual, which was upped to four speeds in 1930. Sixty miles per hour arrived in less than 20 breezy seconds. With the arrival of the 5.1-liter, power jumped to 112 horses.

The Imperial was immediately notable for its performance, and the earliest version was dubbed the E-80. That number was chosen given the Imperial’s guaranteed all-day speed of 80 miles per hour. Imperial set a transcontinental speed record immediately and proved its performance and quality by traveling over 6,500 miles in a single week. It was then chosen for the high-profile job as the pace car for the 1926 edition of the Indianapolis 500. The E-80 was renamed Series 80 the following year and then expanded to 80L with longer wheelbase availability.

Imperial’s reputation for quality, luxury, and performance was cemented by its first generation, which ran only through 1930. The last couple years of Series 80 production were mostly engineering and styling tweaks, as Chrysler focused on a brand new Imperial, the CG.

CG debuted in 1931 as the Imperial 8. The “8” stood for its new inline cylinder total. The new power plant was a considerable 384 cubic inch (6.3L) mill, again featured in a slightly larger displacement than the less luxurious Chrysler Eight (later the Royal), DeSoto Eight, and Dodge Eight. Power totaled 125 horses. New on the Series CG was a longer hood and equally long fenders. Windshields were split in the middle by metal trim, just like a contemporary Cord.

The new Imperial was at the forefront of luxurious equipment and technology. Fenders had rustproofing, there was safety glass, sun visors for both front occupants, and the steering column adjusted. Hydraulic brakes via Lockheed pulled Imperials to a halt. New in ’31 was Floating Power technology. Developed in-house at Chrysler, the Imperial’s engine was attached to the chassis at two points, front and rear. The points acted as a balance and allowed the engine to rotate slightly on its mountings, which reduced vibration into the chassis and cabin. The technology worked and even impressed Citroën, who licensed it for the Traction Avant. Transmissions in this generation were all four-speed manuals, and a vacuum-operated clutch was optional.

Body style offerings increased with the 1931 Imperial, as a four-door convertible was officially offered in addition to all body styles from the first-gen Imperial. Briggs and LeBaron were the primary coachbuilders in the early Thirties, but bespoke work was also given to Drauz and Waterhouse. Base pricing started at $2,745 ($47,000 adj) for a sedan, and was $3,575 ($61,600 adj) for a Phaeton built by LeBaron, and climbed from there. By that point, imported luxury cars from Europe were a factor in the American auto landscape. Mercedes-Benz offered the 770, Rolls-Royce the Phantom II, and even Renault had the Reinastella.

The Series CG existed for only the first year of the second Imperial. In 1932 a less expensive Series CH appeared, and the CG renamed itself CL. The CL added the word Custom after its name, to indicate the model was made for the bespoke-type car buyer. CH used a 10-inch shorter wheelbase (135″) than the flagship CL. CH was also limited in body styles: a two-door roadster, and a four-door sedan and convertible. Most options on Chrysler’s top offering (Series CP) were standard on the Imperials. And Imperials used all-steel bodies, and were visually different with their trumpet-style horns and split windows.

The lower reaching CH Imperial became a bit of an issue for Chrysler, where the smaller Imperial with its illustrious brand, larger engine, and exclusive styling cost almost exactly the same as a top trim CP Chrysler. The CH was seen clearly as a lesser model by traditional Imperial buyers, who opted for the CL instead. By 1932 Chrysler chose LeBaron as its sole coachbuilder for the CL Imperial, and Chrysler knew a correction was needed for the lower-rung CH Imperial.

So in 1933, the CH disappeared and the Series CQ was new. Chopped a further 10 inches from the already reduced CH, CQ used a 125-inch wheelbase. Crucially for prestige differentiation, the CQ used a smaller 299 cubic inch (4.9L) version of the inline-eight. Bodywork was provided by Briggs, not LeBaron, and was limited to fixed roof and convertible two- and four-doors. Series CH cars also lost a gear and moved back down to a three-speed manual. But the winds of change were blowing in the bespoke luxury car market, and Chrysler sold 3,838 cheaper CQs, and 151 CLs in 1933.

The third generation Imperial the following year was a rather radical departure for Imperial, and in hindsight, a blunder by Chrysler. More in Part II.

[Images: Chrysler]

Join the conversation
2 of 9 comments
  • Syke Syke on Oct 20, 2021

    A well written article on a criminally ignored line of cars. All too often, historians get too taken up with V-12's and V-16's, forgetting that during the Twenties and Thirties six and eight cylinders powered some incredibly beautiful cars.

  • Jeff S Jeff S on Oct 22, 2021

    Jackson and Perkins many years ago even named a variety of roses Chrysler Imperial. Imperial was once a name that denoted true luxury. Very good article.

  • Jim Bonham Full EVs are not for everyone, they cannot meet all needs. Hybrids do a much better job of providing the benefits of EVs without most of the drawbacks. I have a hybrid sedan with plenty of room, plus all the bells and whistles. It has 360 hp, AWD, does 0-60 in just over 5 sec.(the instant torque is a real benefit), and I get 29 mpg, average. NOT driven lightly. I bought it used for $25k.Sure, it's a little heavier because of the battery, motor, etc., but not nearly as much as a full EV. The battery is smaller/lighter/cheaper and both the alternator and starter motor are eliminated since the motor assumes those functions. It's cool to watch the charge guage show I'm getting energy back when coasting and/or braking. It's even cooler to drive around part of the time on battery only. It really comes in handy in traffic since the engine turns off and you don't waste fuel idling. With the adaptive cruise control you just let the car slowly inch along by itself.I only wish it were a Plug-in Hybrid (PHEV). Then, I'd have A LOT more EV-only range, along with even more of that instant torque. The battery would be bigger, but still a fraction of the size of a full EV. I could easily go weeks without using much, if any gas (depending upon my commute) IF I plug it in every night. But I don't have to. The gas engine will charge the battery whenever it's needed.It's just not as efficient a way to do it.Electric companies offer special rates for both EVs and PHEVs which lower your operating cost compared to gasoline. They'll even give you a rebate to offset the cost of installing a home charger. You can still get federal (up to $7,500, plus some state) tax credits for PHEVs.What's not to like? My next daily driver will be a PHEV of some kind. Probably a performance-oriented one like the new Dodge Hornet or one of the German Hybrid SUVs. All the benefits, sound, feel, etc., of a gas vehicle along with some electric assist to improve fuel economy, performance, and drivability. None of the inherent EV issues of cost, range anxiety, long charging times, poor charger availability, grid capacity issues, etc. I think most people will eventually catch on to this and go PHEV instead of going full EV. Synthetic, carbon-neutral eFuels, hydrogen engines, and other things will also prevent full EVs from being 100% of the fleet, regardless of what the politicians say. PHEVs can be as "clean" (overall) as full EVs with the right fuels. They're also cheaper, and far more practical, for most people. They can do it all, EVs can't.
  • Ron rufo there is in WaSHINGTON STATE
  • ToolGuy @Chris, your photography rocks.
  • ToolGuy No War for Oli.If you have not ever held a piece of structural honeycomb (composite sandwich) in your own hands, try it.
  • ToolGuy You make them sound like criminals.