Opinion: Toyota's Political Giving Encourages the Big Lie

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

A report from Axios shows that Toyota has given $55,000 to 37 Republican politicians who objected to the certification of Joe Biden’s election as president of the United States.

That’s about a quarter of the number of GOP pols who voted against certifying Biden’s win.

Axios notes that one of the politicians that the automaker donated to is Andy Biggs, a Republican House representative from Arizona who was a driving force behind the “Stop the Steal” rally that preceded the insurrection in Washington on January 6.

When Axios asked about it, an unnamed Toyota spokesman answered in a blitz of bewildering hypocrisy.

“We do not believe it is appropriate to judge members of Congress solely based on their votes on the electoral certification,” Toyota emailed Axios. “Based on our thorough review, we decided against giving to some members who, through their statements and actions, undermine the legitimacy of our elections and institutions.”

That seems hypocritical to my eyes — or at the very least, it seems like Toyota is trying to have it both ways. You can’t say that you don’t think it appropriate to judge members of Congress only on whether they voted against election certification and then turn around and say you won’t give to SOME members who undermined the legitimacy of elections — since EVERYONE who voted against certification was working to undermine our democracy.

To be clear, this isn’t a partisan position that I am taking. You know by now that your author leans left politically, but I’d be saying the same if it was Democrats voting against the certification of a Republican president based on nonexistent evidence of fraud. I’d also be saying this if I was a conservative and/or Republican (not always the same thing) who was disappointed Biden won.

This isn’t partisan, nor is it a reasonable debate that can be had by opposing sides. It’s about reality, which isn’t up for debate. A certain segment of the GOP ignored reality voted not to certify Joe Biden’s victory for no reason other than an attempt to retain power and/or humor the fringier/crazier elements of the party’s base. There is no evidence of fraud — Joe Biden won and Donald Trump lost, fair and square.

And now Toyota is giving money to 37 of those politicians. It’s unlikely that Toyota, as a company, believes the election was stolen. It’s also unlikely that Toyota prefers the ideology of one party over another — indeed, data from OpenSecrets shows Toyota actually gave more to Democrats than Republicans in 2020. I understand that Toyota’s giving, like that of any other large company, is strategic, meant to influence politicians of both parties into working towards policy that would benefit Toyota and/or the automotive industry as a whole.

I reached out to Toyota and a spokesperson sent this statement, which includes the sentences Axios highlighted: “Toyota’s PAC, by design, is bipartisan in nature and we contribute equally to the Democratic and Republican party. Toyota supports candidates based on their position on issues that are important to the auto industry and the company. We do not believe it is appropriate to judge members of Congress solely based on their votes on the electoral certification. Based on our thorough review, we decided against giving to some members who, through their statements and actions, undermine the legitimacy of our elections and institutions.”

For better or worse, companies giving to both parties has been the standard operating procedure. Big company X donates to politicians from both sides in order to influence policy out of self-interest. It might seem scummy to those of us who can’t buy influence, but it’s logical and legal.

But things changed in January. A swath of Congress voted to nullify the results of a free and fair election. And they didn’t do so for any good-faith reason — they used evidence-free claims of election fraud in a grab for power and/or to appease an unhinged element of their party’s base. Big corporations should not be rewarding such behavior.

Anyone, Republican or Democrat or Independent, who voted against certifying the election should be professionally punished for attempting to undermine our democracy. Actions have consequences. Companies like Toyota should cast aside self-interest and deny these ghouls the funds they need to stay in power. Continuing to donate just gives them the impression that they can do what they want, no matter how damaging it is to this country, without repercussions.

Sadly, the reality is that when money and morals collide, money often wins out. And Toyota, like any other big company, certainly has reasons to continue to donate to those whose lies helped inspire an insurrection.

It would be better for America, if not necessarily Toyota, if the automaker (and every other company listed in the Axios piece) cut off the seditionists. But considering that the only people being held accountable for their actions are the Joe and Jane Six-packs who got caught infiltrating the Capitol on January 6, I won’t hold my breath for anyone to say “enough is enough” any time soon.

[Image: Toyota]

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 221 comments
  • 28-Cars-Later "“The consumer needs to be educated. Those batteries are proving to have 12-, 15-year life cycles, and most of us don’t even hold a vehicle for 12 or 15 years.”" So reading between the lines, Mr. Trotsky has decided there will be no more used cars as we know them. Unless BEVs designs accommodate battery cell repair/replacement (or will in the near future), Our Not Social Betters have decided to bring Logan's Run to the auto industry. But keep cheering for them proles while they laugh.
  • AZFelix In other news, EV propagandists now recommend buyers only display 80% of their enthusiasm of buying an electric car in order to achieve their long term goal of transitioning to BEV only car sales.
  • 28-Cars-Later Unpossible. "most research shows that batteries should last more than a decade." More than a decade could be eleven years. Meanwhile three of mine are or are very close to being twice as old and still kicking. Beater life doesn't begin until 15 yo... guess we can't have those anymore Mr. Trotsky?
  • Ollicat “The consumer needs to be educated." I think he means, "The consumer needs to be brainwashed."
  • Jalop1991 Thank God it wasn't an EV. It'd still be burning.
Next