FCA Could Face $840 Million in New U.S. Regulatory Fees


Fiat Chrysler Automobiles has said that it might be looking at $840 million if it wants to settle a Justice Department investigation into excess diesel emissions and threw some mild shade at regulators.
The manufacturer noted that the U.S. appeals court’s August ruling that overturned the Trump administration’s July 2019 rule that suspended a National Highway Traffic Safety Administration regulation more than doubling emissions penalties for automakers is playing a major factor in that sum. Obviously, it wishes they hadn’t.
In 2019, FCA agreed to an $800 million settlement to resolve claims from the Justice Department, California Air Resources Board (CARB), and customers over the use of illicit software that falsified testing information on diesels. This was in conjunction with other emission-related fines and came off several years of having to pay tens-of-millions in civil penalties for failing to adhere to U.S. fuel economy requirements. While some of this has been offset via the purchasing of carbon credits in both the United States and Europe, it still represents a financial setback for FCA.
According to Reuters, FCA would like the August ruling that’s poised to jack up its current diesel emission penance appealed. Otherwise, it “may need to accrue additional amounts due to increased CAFE penalties and additional amounts owed under certain agreements for the purchase of regulatory emissions credits.”
From Reuters:
FCA in a securities filing said the amounts “accrued could be up to 500 million euros ($581 million) depending on, among other things, our ability to implement future product actions or other actions to modify the utilization of credits.”
The automaker declined to comment Monday.
In October 2019, FCA said it incurred a $79 million U.S. civil penalty for failing to meet 2017 fuel economy requirements after paying $77.3 million for 2016 requirements.
FCA’s filing said it is uncertain if “NHTSA will appeal the ruling” and unclear if the ruling will be applied retroactively to the 2019 model year.
[Image: FCA]
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Johnny ringo It's an interesting vehicle, I'd like to see VW offer the two row Buzz in the states also.
- Chuck Norton And guys are having wide spread issues with the 10 speed transmission with the HP numbers out of the factory......
- Zerofoo "Hyundais just got better and better during the 1990s, though, and memories of those shoddy Excels faded."Never. A friend had an early 90s Hyundai Excel as his college beater. One day he decided that the last tank of gas he bought was worth more than the car. He drove it to empty and then he and his fraternity brothers pushed it into the woods and left it there.
- Kwik_Shift There are no new Renegades for sale within my geographic circle of up to 85 kms. Looks like the artificial shortage game. They bring one in, 10 buyers line up for it, $10,000 over MSRP. Yeah. Like with a lot of new cars.
- Ribbedroof In Oklahoma, no less!
Comments
Join the conversation
You're damn right lawmakers want to racketeer off gas guzzler profits. If cleaner air happens, it's a byproduct. CAFE struck fear into automakers in the '70s, hence Pinto and FWD based muscle cars. The potential billions in fines were a huge deal. Today they're much easier to swallow, a couple billion dollars here or there annually. The CAFE fines are still the same since the beginning, so thanks to inflation, everyone's happy and no cares about air pollution.
99% of the time they won't go anywhere near off road. 50% of the time they're driven by women. A poser truck if there ever was. But if you must have the only 5K lb. 'midsize' pickup with removable doors, roof, wallet, and don't mind spending north of $33K just to get power windows, then go for it Karen.