EU Bans Rolls-Royce's Illuminated Spirit of Ecstasy for 'Light Pollution'

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Those of you familiar with vintage motorcars will recall that there was once a period in history where hood ornaments weren’t the classy exception but the rule. Automakers have been affixing their corporate iconography to the top of vehicles since before there were seat belts, tapping members of the animal kingdom, indigenous leaders who opposed the British (back when such things were acceptable), winged letters of the alphabet, rocket ships, and just about everything else one could imagine wanting to stick atop an automobile. But most of those have been modified to suit the times and/or relocated onto the grille in an effort to avoid impaling pedestrians (Ed. note: And perhaps theft. I think my grandparents had the hood ornament stolen off their mid-’90s era Buick once. — TH).

While a few companies attempted to get around government safety regulations by implementing flexibly mounted hood ornaments designed to avoid stabbing the person you’ve already done the disservice of hitting with your car, just about all of them have given up the ghost by 2020. The only notable exception is Rolls-Royce, which has spent a fortune designing a spring-loaded device that snaps its famous Spirit of Ecstasy (aka the Flying Lady) down inside the engine bay whenever a moderate amount of force is applied.

The company has since decided to update its ornament to allow drivers to retract it on demand. It has also started offering a £3,500 option that makes Spirit of Ecstasy an illuminated crystal bauble that has suddenly run afoul of the European Union’s new light pollution regulations. Rolls-Royce will need to remove it from its brochures and customers will be forced to neuter their vehicles if they want to be compliant with the law.

While we can’t imagine panicked millionaires rushing to get these “fixed” after some cop pulls them over with a funny-sounding siren, the manufacturer will undoubtedly be scrubbing the option to avoid being fined. The manufacturer actually seems to have been aware of the regulations for a while. But wasn’t clear what would need to be done as Brexit negotiations continue, seemingly without end.

“In February 2019 we sent our dealers a bulletin saying we were removing the option of an lit Spirit of Ecstasy. It was no longer to be sold to customers. It came off the options list,” a Rolls-Royce spokesman told The Daily Mail. “Sadly, we are telling our customers that we will by law have to disconnect their Spirit of Ecstasy.”

The latest hubbub seems to stem from dissatisfied owners who don’t see any good reason to modify their mega-luxury vehicles based on regulatory guidelines focused on seemingly innocuous design choices. Unlike some other outlets that mocked Rolls-Royce owners as decadent capitalists and sarcastically treated this as a non-problem, we’re incredibly interested in how this might impact future automotive designs. The guidelines for what lighting applications constitute a “statutory nuisance” in the EU seem terribly vague. Once complaints of light pollution have been made, regulators need only to assess whether the glow in question serves any purpose. This has made everything from holiday decorations to security lights (business or domestic) subject to new restrictions.

That also makes Rolls-Royce the first automaker we’re aware of that’s being forced to change anything in Europe. But we’re betting it won’t be the last. Tons of manufacturers have added illuminated accents to the exteriors of their products in recent years. Mercedes-Benz will even sell you a Three-Point Star that lights up, assuming you haven’t already purchased one from the dozens of aftermarket firms offering the same item. All of that sounds as if it could easily be in violation of EU regulations if the right person complains.

As for those troubled Rolls-Royce customers, the company said it would happily swap out their glistening Flying Ladies for a traditional Spirit statuette and refund them £3,500 used to purchase the now-illegal option. But new vehicles won’t be sold with them anymore. Moving forward, Rolls intends on using the standard double R emblem by itself and retiring the Flying Lady.

[Image: Rolls-Royce/BMW Group]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 35 comments
  • Jeff S Jeff S on Oct 15, 2020

    I would file this story under who really cares. Most cars don't have hood ornaments just large ugly Billy Bass grills. Very few readers on this website will ever own a Rolls.

  • Schurkey Schurkey on Oct 15, 2020

    Any possibility of getting rid of Damned Daytime Running Lights?

    • See 3 previous
    • BigDuke6 BigDuke6 on Oct 15, 2020

      @28-Cars-Later OK. Not trying to be confrontational, but can you explain why you think they are "stupid"? I'm curious.

  • ToolGuy The two individuals in the first picture are walking away from those vehicles with the asymmetrical wheels, and you should too. ¶ Drove ~100 miles yesterday to bring my latest ICE vehicle acquisition home. Most of the roads were blocked by EVs which had run out of range. During food stops I noticed fistfights at all of the charging stations, but there were no charging stations. About a third of the EVs were actively burning. The drink dispenser and the cash register weren't working because the store had no power because the U.S. electrical grid has been overwhelmed by all of the EVs that no one is buying. ¶ Purchased gasoline at the end of my journey and saw an individual pull in and fill up and pay all in the span of 15 seconds; I asked him how he did that and he said he learned how to do that on some website called TTAC. He also dabbed a little gasoline on as cologne and spritzed some into his drink. ¶ Back at home, checked the prices of used EVs (again).
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Keep failing upwards.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X More broken Biden promises.
  • Tassos MOST OF MY GRADES WERE ALSO FAILURES BUT I MANAGED TO SUCCEED EVENTUALLY
  • Paul Alexander It seems to me that the electric cars are really ideal for those that can afford to install the infrastructure to charge at home and less than ideal for those of us who cannot. Putting in solar and a 240 outlet on your house makes a ton of sense, especially if you also have another non-electric car for long distance travel. Having an electric car as your only car and relying on public charging stations seems like a fools errand.
Next