Supplier Layoffs Planned at Schaeffler, Continental as Economy Dies

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky
supplier layoffs planned at schaeffler continental as economy dies

Germany’s Schaeffler AG will reportedly be eliminating 4,400 jobs and abandoning several facilities in its home country as the supplier confronts what it dubbed complications relating to the global pandemic. Like Continental, which is actually controlled by the same people, Schaeffler has been coping with lessened demand after automakers around the globe shut down earlier this year as a precautionary measure. While the coronavirus lockdowns can’t be faulted for every issue the companies are facing, they have been a thorn in the side of parts suppliers everywhere.

Continental announced it would need to eliminate roughly 13 percent of its workforce last week. That’s roughly 30,000 fewer jobs. Schaeffler’s restructuring plan only calls for eliminating 4,000 positions. However, it is the smaller of the two and has decided to spread its cuts out as much as possible.

Schaeffler will be freeing up jobs at facilities across Europe with a couple of sites likely to be closed or sold to other entities as a way to save money. According to Bloomberg, Georg Schaeffler and his mother Maria Elisabeth Schaeffler-Thumann (some of the suppliers’ largest shareholders) have seen one of the deepest declines in wealth among Europe’s richest families in 2020. While its hard to get misty over that when poor people also seem to be taking it on the chin with a sledgehammer, it would explain why Schaeffler Group (which includes Continental) is so interested in fixing its finances.

From Bloomberg:

Most of the reductions will take place at a dozen facilities in Germany and two sites elsewhere in Europe, the maker of engine, transmission and chassis components said in a statement Wednesday. Factories in Wuppertal, Eltmann and Clasthal-Zellerfeld will be shut or shopped to other companies, with the cuts expected to save Schaeffler as much as 300 million euros ($354 million) a year. The company will take a one-time charge of 700 million euros ($826 million) for the restructuring.

“We’re in a situation where the really bad effects of the pandemic are easing, but the levels we saw in 2019, we’re not going to reach anytime soon,” CEO Klaus Rosenfeld said in an interview, adding that a recovery might take until 2024. “It’s not going to be v-shaped.”

Schaeffler is also planning on raising $1.5 billion through new shares and offered a voluntary severance package to nearly 2,000 employees it thought might be willing to retire early. While technically still profitable, the business’ revenue has shrunk by around 20 percent through the first half of this year and has begun costing its biggest shareholders money. But this all gets fixed for suppliers the second the lockdowns end, right?

Not necessarily.

Plenty of countries plan to maintain rather aggressive restrictions through the remainder of this year. While that timeline could be shortened by demonstrations demanding governments stop enforcing unsustainable safety policies, tons of economic damage has already been done in the name of health. With unemployment already up around the world and rolling reports of how coronavirus lockdowns obliterated local economies, many are convinced a secondary round of restrictions would guarantee a prolonged economic depression. Some are even suggesting we’re already in for another recession akin to the one endured in 2008, regardless of what steps are taken now.

[Image: nitpicker/Shutterstock]

Comments
Join the conversation
 20 comments
  • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Sep 10, 2020

    "While its hard to get misty over that when poor people also seem to be taking it on the chin with a sledgehammer..." More class envy at TTAC. If the "rich guy" (defined as someone with $1 more than you) takes a hit, then so do his employees. I've never received a paycheck from a poor man, and you don't enrich the poor by impoverishing the rich. So yes, I'll shed a tear for the Schaeffler family's travails.

    • See 18 previous
    • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Sep 12, 2020

      @Arthur Dailey Nortel was taken over by Huawai and now 5G is Ericsson, Nokia and Huawai and Huawai is winning the war. American CEOs has an ability to run into ground most successful companies in Solar system and become obscenely rich in the process. They support BLM and Democrats so they are safe. And they are not afraid of Republicans either. Who does?

  • Jim Bonham Full EVs are not for everyone, they cannot meet all needs. Hybrids do a much better job of providing the benefits of EVs without most of the drawbacks. I have a hybrid sedan with plenty of room, plus all the bells and whistles. It has 360 hp, AWD, does 0-60 in just over 5 sec.(the instant torque is a real benefit), and I get 29 mpg, average. NOT driven lightly. I bought it used for $25k.Sure, it's a little heavier because of the battery, motor, etc., but not nearly as much as a full EV. The battery is smaller/lighter/cheaper and both the alternator and starter motor are eliminated since the motor assumes those functions. It's cool to watch the charge guage show I'm getting energy back when coasting and/or braking. It's even cooler to drive around part of the time on battery only. It really comes in handy in traffic since the engine turns off and you don't waste fuel idling. With the adaptive cruise control you just let the car slowly inch along by itself.I only wish it were a Plug-in Hybrid (PHEV). Then, I'd have A LOT more EV-only range, along with even more of that instant torque. The battery would be bigger, but still a fraction of the size of a full EV. I could easily go weeks without using much, if any gas (depending upon my commute) IF I plug it in every night. But I don't have to. The gas engine will charge the battery whenever it's needed.It's just not as efficient a way to do it.Electric companies offer special rates for both EVs and PHEVs which lower your operating cost compared to gasoline. They'll even give you a rebate to offset the cost of installing a home charger. You can still get federal (up to $7,500, plus some state) tax credits for PHEVs.What's not to like? My next daily driver will be a PHEV of some kind. Probably a performance-oriented one like the new Dodge Hornet or one of the German Hybrid SUVs. All the benefits, sound, feel, etc., of a gas vehicle along with some electric assist to improve fuel economy, performance, and drivability. None of the inherent EV issues of cost, range anxiety, long charging times, poor charger availability, grid capacity issues, etc. I think most people will eventually catch on to this and go PHEV instead of going full EV. Synthetic, carbon-neutral eFuels, hydrogen engines, and other things will also prevent full EVs from being 100% of the fleet, regardless of what the politicians say. PHEVs can be as "clean" (overall) as full EVs with the right fuels. They're also cheaper, and far more practical, for most people. They can do it all, EVs can't.
  • Ron rufo there is in WaSHINGTON STATE
  • ToolGuy @Chris, your photography rocks.
  • ToolGuy No War for Oli.If you have not ever held a piece of structural honeycomb (composite sandwich) in your own hands, try it.
  • ToolGuy You make them sound like criminals.
Next